Anatomic Single-Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Restores Rotational Stability: A Robotic Study in Cadaveric Knees.

PURPOSE: First, we aimed to investigate the ability of a single bone-patellar tendon-bone graft placed in the anatomic center of the femoral and tibial attachment sites to restore normal tibiofemoral compartment translations and tibial rotation. Second, we aimed to investigate what combination of anterior load and internal rotation torque applied during a pivot-shift test produces maximal anterior tibiofemoral subluxations. METHODS: We used a 6-df robotic simulator to test 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens under anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-intact, ACL-sectioned, and ACL-reconstructed conditions measuring anterior translations of the medial, central, and lateral tibiofemoral compartments and degrees of tibial rotation. Specimens were loaded under Lachman, anterior limit, and internal rotation conditions, as well as 3 different pivot-shift conditions. RESULTS: On ACL sectioning, compartment translations in the Lachman and 3 pivot-shift tests increased significantly and were restored to ACL-intact values after single-graft ACL reconstruction. In the pivot-shift tests, the single graft restored lateral and medial compartment translations (e.g., group 3, within 1.3 ± 0.6 mm and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, of the ACL-intact state and internal rotation within 0.7° ± 1.2°). Anterior subluxation of the medial compartment during pivot-shift loading was reduced when internal rotation torque was increased from 1 to 5 Nm (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: A single-graft ACL reconstruction performed at the central femoral and tibial ACL attachment sites restored anterior-posterior translation and tibial rotation motion limits. In addition, rotational knee stability as defined by tibiofemoral compartment translations was restored under all simulated pivot-shift testing conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides in vitro evidence to support the clinical use of single-graft ACL reconstructions in restoring tibiofemoral compartment translations. It also shows the advantage of describing ACL insufficiency in terms of medial and lateral compartment subluxations as compared with the common approach of describing changes in central tibial translations and rotations.

Effect of anteromedial and posterolateral anterior cruciate ligament bundles on resisting medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment subluxations.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the interaction of the anteromedial and posterolateral portions of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in resisting medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment subluxations under multiple loading conditions. METHODS: By use of a 6-df robotic simulator, 10 human cadaveric knees were tested in 3 states: intact ACL, partial ACL (loss of either the anteromedial bundle [AMB] or posterolateral bundle [PLB]), and deficient ACL. The testing profile involved anterior-posterior translation and internal-external rotation, as well as 3 pivot-shift loading conditions with varying internal rotation torque (1- or 5-Nm) and coupled anterior force (35- or 100-N). Digitization of anatomic landmarks provided tibiofemoral compartment translations and centers of tibial rotation. RESULTS: During pivot-shift testing (100-N anterior force, 1-Nm internal rotation torque, and 7-Nm valgus), the lateral and medial compartment anterior translation increased by a mean of 2.5 ± 0.8 mm (P = .016) and 3.4 ± 2.0 mm (P = .001), respectively, on AMB sectioning and 1.3 ± 0.9 mm (P = .329) and 0.6 ± 0.7 mm (P = .544), respectively, on PLB sectioning. Higher internal rotation torque (5 Nm v 1 Nm) on pivot-shift testing reduced central and medial anterior translation after ACL sectioning. There was no change in internal rotation on AMB or PLB sectioning. During the Lachman test (100-N), AMB and PLB sectioning increased central translation by 3.6 ± 1.6 mm (P = .001) and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm (P = .498), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACL bundles function synergistically in resisting medial and lateral compartment subluxations on the Lachman and pivot-shift tests. The AMB provided more restraint to anterior tibial translation during both tests as compared with the PLB. PLB sectioning produced no statistically significant change in anterior translation on the Lachman or pivot-shift test. Neither bundle contributed to resisting internal rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An ACL graft designed to duplicate the AMB would theoretically resist medial and lateral compartment anterior subluxations under multiple loading conditions. The PLB provides a secondary restraint at low flexion angles. Neither ACL bundle resists internal tibial rotation or allows a positive pivot-shift subluxation.

Anterior cruciate ligament function in providing rotational stability assessed by medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment translations and subluxations.

BACKGROUND: Rotational knee stability provided by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the pivot-shift phenomena involves analysis of more complex robotic testing profiles and resulting tibiofemoral compartment kinematics and subluxations. HYPOTHESES: Using anterior-posterior tibial forces along with internal and valgus tibial moments will produce a major anterior subluxation of both tibiofemoral compartments not obtained with internal and valgus moments alone. Increasing the internal torque in pivot-shift testing will constrain the anterior subluxations of the medial and central tibial compartments. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic knee testing system applied anterior translation and rotational loading profiles in 10 cadaveric knees before and after ACL sectioning. Changes in knee motion limits were measured, and medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment translations were determined by digitization of tibial plateau anatomic landmarks. Loading profiles simulated Lachman and tibial rotation tests as well as typical pivot-shift loading profiles from prior in vitro and in vivo studies. RESULTS: After ACL sectioning, anterior tibial translation increased by 10.3 ± 3.7 mm at 25° of flexion (P < .001). Internal tibial rotation increased by 1.6° ± 1.1° (5 N·m; P > .05). In pivot-shift tests (anterior translation, 100 N; internal rotation, 1 N·m; valgus, 7 N·m), the tibial rotation center shifted outside the medial tibial margin, with abnormal anterior translation of both compartments (medial, 12.9 ± 3.9 mm; lateral, 7.5 ± 3.7 mm; P < .001), with internal rotation decreasing by 4.1° ± 3.5° (P < .05). A greater internal rotation torque (5 vs 1 N·m) in the pivot-shift test constrained and limited anterior tibial translation and prevented anterior subluxation of the medial compartment (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Sectioning of the ACL produces major increases in tibiofemoral compartment translations and only small increases in internal tibial rotation. The simulation of the pivot shift requires a combined loading profile of anterior translation, internal rotation, and valgus, which produces the greatest anterior subluxation of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. This testing profile is recommended to be included along with other loading profiles for future ACL studies. The application of a high internal rotation torque in cadaveric pivot-shift tests constrains anterior tibial subluxation of the medial and center compartments and appears less ideal for analysis of ACL function and graft reconstructions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be cautious in interpreting conclusions on ACL function and graft reconstructions without knowing the resulting tibiofemoral subluxations or loading conditions that may limit maximum anterior tibial femoral subluxations.