Effect of coexisting adenomyosis on tumour characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer, with and without associated adenomyosis. PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant observational studies. The pooled effect sizes were reported as either hazards ratio (HR) for survival-related outcomes or as odds ratio (OR) for other categorical outcomes. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was reported for continuous outcomes. All the analyses used the random effects model. A total of 21 studies (N = 46,420) were included. Compared to endometrial cancer patients without adenomyosis, patients with associated adenomyosis had improved overall 5-year survival (OS) (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.82). Disease-specific survival was statistically similar in patients with and without adenomyosis (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.05). Among patients with adenomyosis, the risk of having an advanced tumour grade (Grade 2 or 3) was lower (OR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.62) and a risk of having International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I or II was higher (OR 2.23, 95% CI: 1.65, 3.01). Patients with adenomyosis had lower risk of tumour invasion of adnexa, cervical stromal invasion, deep myometrial involvement (DMI), lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) and peritoneal invasion. Presence of adenomyosis in patients with endometrial cancer is associated with favourable tumour characteristics and may improve the survival.

A modified technique to perform para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vein.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of our modified technique to perform lymph node excision up to the renal vein in cases of gynecological cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 87 patients with endometrial or ovarian neoplasms underwent laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LPAL) up to the left renal vein were enrolled prospectively. During surgery, the surgeon was positioned to the right side of the patient and an additional trocar was introduced into the upper right abdomen. The laparoscopic video screen was placed to the side of the patient's head. Three-fan retractor forceps were used to hold up the duodenum and small bowel. The rest of the procedure was the same as conventional LPAL. RESULTS: The median operating time for LPAL was 72 min (range: 40-115 min) and the median estimated blood loss was 45 ml (range: 15-1000 mL). There were two cases of intra-operative vascular injury. The median number of retrieved para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) was 18 (range: 10-37). Of the 87 patients, 11 patients had positive PALNs. None of the cases required laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that our modified LPAL technique is feasible, reproducible, can achieve good exposure and reduces surgical difficulty.