Sex differences in outcomes of people with cystic fibrosis treated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

BACKGROUND: There is a well described sex-disparity in outcomes of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF), with females faring worse than males. Given the dramatic improvement in overall health of people with CF using CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), the sex-disparity in CF warrants re-examination. METHODS: We evaluated the effects of ETI use by sex prior to versus after initiation of ETI by pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1), presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum cultures, and body mass index (BMI). We used univariate and multivariable longitudinal regression adjusting for key confounders, such as age, race, CFTR modulator taken prior to ETI and baseline ppFEV1. RESULTS: We included 251 individuals started on ETI between January 2014 to September 2022. We collected data for a mean of 5.45 years pre-ETI and 2.38 years post-ETI. We found the adjusted presence of PEx decreased more in males than females pre- to post-ETI with the odds of having a PEx in males being 0.57 (43% reduction) versus females 0.75 (25% reduction) (p = 0.049). We found no statistical difference by sex for ppFEV1, presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or BMI pre- to post-ETI by sex. CONCLUSION: After treatment with ETI, there was a greater decline in PEx in males versus females. Long-term impact of ETI by sex is still unknown, but we will need to seek ways to effectively tailor care for individuals with CF and consider pharmacokinetic studies of ETI comparing males to females.

Formative evaluation of a dashboard to support coproduction of healthcare services in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare coproduction engages patients and clinicians to design and execute services, yet little is known about tools that facilitate coproduction. Our objective was to understand uptake, experiences, benefits, and limitations of a dashboard to support patient-clinician partnerships within the cystic fibrosis (CF) community. METHODS: People living with CF (PwCF) and clinicians co-designed a dashboard that displayed patient-reported and clinical data. Eight CF programmes, including 21 clinicians, and 131 PwCF participated in a pilot study of the dashboard. We conducted descriptive statistics and thematic analyses of surveys (82 PwCF; 21 clinicians); semi-structured interviews (13 PwCF; 8 care teams); and passively-collected usage data. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the 82 PwCF used the dashboard during a visit, and 59% used it outside a visit. Among 48 PwCF using the dashboard outside the clinic, 92% viewed their health information and 46% documented concerns or requests. Most of the 21 clinicians used the dashboard to support visit planning (76%); fewer used it during a visit (48%). The dashboard supported discussions of what matters most (69% PwCF; 68% clinicians). Several themes emerged: access to patient outcomes data allows users to learn more deeply; participation in pre-visit planning matters; coproduction is made possible by inviting new ways to partner; and lack of integration with existing information technology (IT) systems is limiting. CONCLUSIONS: A dashboard was feasible to implement and use. Future iterations should provide patients access to their data, be simple to use, and integrate with IT systems in use by clinicians and PwCF.