FGFR3 Nuclear Translocation Contributes to Proliferative Potential and Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) was revealed to have divergent, even opposite roles in different neoplasms. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its impact on biological behavior and prognosis was not well elucidated. METHODS: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 was downregulated by RNA interference to explore its impact on cell proliferative proclivity in PDAC cells. Furthermore, tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry for FGFR3 was performed in 326 patients with PDAC who underwent radical resection, and its clinicopathologic and prognostic implications were then evaluated. RESULTS: First, successful FGFR3 knockdown remarkably decreased its expression, cell proliferation, and S-phase ratio in the cell cycle in 2 PDAC cell lines, BxPC-3 and AsPC-1. Meanwhile, alterations in p-Akt, cyclin D1, cyclin B1, and p21 were also observed. Subsequently, high nuclear FGFR3 expression, but not cytoplasmic, was significantly common in tumor tissues and positively associated with N stage and dismal overall survival in the entire cohort. In addition, nuclear FGFR3 expression was also prognostic in 10 of 14 subsets. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified nuclear expression of FGFR3 as an independent prognosticator in the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that FGFR3 nuclear translocation contributes to cell proliferative potential and predicts poor long-term prognosis in PDAC after surgical resection.

Expression and Prognostic Value of Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic 7, Matrix Metalloproteinase 2, and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Thus far, expression, clinicopathologic, and prognostic implication of small mothers against decapentaplegic 7 (Smad7), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were rarely investigated or controversial. METHODS: Expression of Smad7, MMP2, and MMP9 was detected using immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays based on 322 patients with curatively resected PDAC. Their expression pattern, clinicopathologic, and prognostic relevance were further evaluated. RESULTS: Smad7 expression was found to be lower in tumor than in adjacent nontumor tissues, whereas tumoral MMP2 and MMP9 staining scores were much higher than in adjacent nontumor ones. Furthermore, Smad7 was negatively associated with serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level. Univariate survival analyses showed that patients with high Smad7 tumors had significantly better disease-specific survival (P = 0.0007), whereas MMP2 and MMP9 predicted poor disease-specific survival (P = 0.0211 and 0.0404). In multivariate Cox regression test, Smad7 was an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.021). In addition, these 3 proteins were also prognostic in many subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Smad7 and MMP2/9 significantly predict good or poor prognosis in resectable PDAC, respectively. Therefore, the genes might serve as a tool or targets for molecular therapy in PDAC.

Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas (IOPN-P) is a rare subtype of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study was performed to summarize the clinicopathological features and management of IOPN-P. METHODS: English-language articles were searched from MEDLINE and EMBASE from the first report of IOPN-P in 1996 until 1 May 2019 following the methodology in the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients from 24 full articles were included in the final data analysis. The patients' average age was 61 years, and the male/female ratio was 1. Most lesions were large (average size, 5.50 cm), located in the pancreatic head, and found either incidentally or by uncharacteristic abdominal symptoms. IOPN-P was usually a cystic and solid lesion with or without mural nodules on radiological examination. A definitive diagnosis was often acquired from fine needle aspiration biopsy or postoperative pathology. All tumors were diagnosed as carcinoma in situ or minimally invasive carcinoma, necessitating surgical resection. The prognosis of IOPN-P was better than that of other IPMN subtypes, even when metastasis occurred. Recurrence after surgical resection of IOPN-P was rare. CONCLUSIONS: IOPN-P is rare among IPMN subtypes with unique pathological characteristics. Because of the nontypical symptoms and radiological findings, a definitive preoperative diagnosis usually depends on multimodal examinations. Management and surveillance of IOPN-P after surgical resection should be differentiated from those of other pancreatic benign cystic lesions because of its relative malignancy, but IOPN-P should also be differentiated from other IPMN subtypes and malignant cystic tumors because of its favorable prognosis.