Preoperative estimation of the survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma achieving complete response after conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: assessments of clinical and LI-RADS MR features.

PURPOSE: To identify the associations of clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) features with overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) achieving complete response (CR) after conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and to further develop an individual nomograph to estimate the survival probability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 112 patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE as first-line treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Potential risk factors associated with OS were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. The survival model was developed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess the performance of each marker and of the whole model. Discrimination was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. A nomogram derived from the survival model was established. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox analyses indicated that nonsmooth tumor margin, peritumoral enhancement, fat sparing in solid mass, and Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage were independent risk indicators associated with OS. The survival model showed acceptable diagnostic power, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.687. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the model discriminated well, as the high-risk and low-risk groups had median survival times of 21.6 months and 34.8 months, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Nonsmooth tumor margin, peritumoral enhancement, fat sparing in solid mass, and BCLC stage were potential biomarkers to evaluate the survival with favorable performance and discriminate HCC patients with CR under conventional TACE treatment.

Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical imaging, which may facilitate early diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT has been assessed in several studies but with variable results. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary TNM staging and the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancers. A systematic search of the PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception until January 2020 was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 58 studies comprising 9,997 patients were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. The sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging of gastric cancer were 49% (95% CI, 37-61%) and 92% (95% CI, 86-96%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 67% (95% CI, 57-76%) and 86% (95% CI, 81-89%) for CECT, respectively. For metastasis staging, the sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI, 40-71%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. For diagnosing cancer recurrence, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI, 72-88%) and 83% (95% CI, 74-89%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT were deemed highly useful for diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer due to their high sensitivities and specificities. However, these techniques cannot be used to exclude or confirm the presence of lymph node metastases or recurrent gastric cancer tumors, but can be used for the confirmation of distal metastasis.