PCR combined with serologic testing improves the yield and efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 infection hunting: A study in 40,689 consecutive overseas arrivals.

Background: The global epidemiological situation of COVID-19 remains serious. The rapid hunting of SARS-CoV-2 infection is the key means for preventing transmission. Methods: A total of 40,689 consecutive overseas arrivals were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection based on PCR and serologic testing. The yield and efficiency of different screening algorithms were evaluated. Result: Among the 40,689 consecutive overseas arrivals, 56 (0.14%) subjects were confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 infection. The asymptomatic rate was 76.8%. When the algorithm based on PCR alone was used, the identification yield of a single round of PCR (PCR1) was only 39.3% (95% CI: 26.1-52.5%). It took at least four rounds of PCR to achieve a yield of 92.9% (95% CI: 85.9-99.8%). Fortunately, an algorithm based on a single round of PCR combined with a single round of serologic testing (PCR1+ Ab1) greatly improved the screening yield to 98.2% (95% CI: 94.6-100.0%) and required 42,299 PCR and 40,689 serologic tests that cost 6,052,855 yuan. By achieving a similar yield, the cost of PCR1+ Ab1 was 39.2% of that of four rounds of PCR. For hunting one case in PCR1+ Ab1, 769 PCR and 740 serologic tests were required, costing 110,052 yuan, which was 63.0% of that of the PCR1 algorithm. Conclusion: Comparing an algorithm based on PCR alone, PCR combined with a serologic testing algorithm greatly improved the yield and efficiency of the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Assessment of anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA) isotypes for the diagnosis and prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis activity.

Our study aims to investigate the serum levels of anti-nucleosome antibody (ANuA) isotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and clarify ANuA isotypes that may diagnose and predict SLE. We detected anti-nucleosome antibodies (ANuA) in the serum from 120 patients with SLE, 99 patients suffering from other autoimmune diseases (OAD), and 50 healthy controls by performing IgG-, IgA-, and IgM-specific ELISAs. The serum levels of total anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA IgG), ANuA IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4), anti-dsDNA antibodies, and the avidities of ANA IgG were also analysed using ELISAs. The levels of three ANuA isotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgM) were significantly higher in patients with SLE than in patients with OAD and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, the concentrations of ANuA isotypes increased in the active SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) groups and in patients with SLE presenting high-avidity IgG ANA (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ANuA isotype levels decreased significantly with drug therapy, while anti-dsDNA IgG levels decreased with the same trend. Additionally, ANuA isotypes were positively related to the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index) score, RAI (relative avidity index) of high-avidity IgG ANAs, and serum anti-dsDNA IgG levels. Last, the sensitivity and specificity values for SLE were 83.33 and 96.67% for ANuA IgG, 85.83 and 93.33% for ANuA IgA, and83.33 and 86.67% for ANuA IgM, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values for LN were 61.67 and 96.67% for ANuA IgG, 49.17 and 96.67% for ANuA IgA, and 52.50 and 96.67% for ANuA IgM, respectively. In conclusion, we evaluated whether ANuA isotypes represent a diagnostic tool to predict SLE activity and define subsets of patients with LN.

The CXCL13 chemokine serves as a potential biomarker to diagnose systemic lupus erythematosus with disease activity.

The aim of our study was to assess the regulatory response of the chemokine CXCL13 in the serum of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with disease activity and to evaluate its influence on the inflammatory process in SLE. Serum samples from 97 SLE patients, 49 non-SLE patients (23 patients with other autoimmune diseases and 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis) and 50 healthy controls were analyzed for the concentration of CXCL13 using ELISA. The results indicated that the serum levels of CXCL13 were significantly higher in SLE patients than in non-SLE patients and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Moreover, the level of CXCL13 decreased as the level of anti-dsDNA IgG decreased after treatment between the anti-dsDNA-positive SLE patients and the anti-dsDNA-negative SLE patients. In addition, serum CXCL13 levels were correlated with SLEDAI in different activities of SLE, renal involvement and active LN. Furthermore, the level of CXCL13 was positively related to the SLEDAI, level of anti-dsDNA IgG, level of ESR and RAI of high-avidity IgG ANAs (HA IgG ANAs). Additionally, statically analysis revealed that CXCL13 would be a best diagnostic value for determining the disease activity of SLE due to its moderate sensitivity (93.5%), specificity (95%), PPV (98.6%), NPV (79.2%) and OR(95%CI,250(30.303-1000)), at a cut-off level of 15.27 pg/mL. First, we indicated that CXCL13 was elevated in SLE patients regardless of the presence or absence of anti-dsDNA IgG ANAs. Furthermore, HA IgG ANAs might affect the circulation of CXCL13. Therefore, the chemokine CXCL13 might be a risk factor influencing the inflammatory process in SLE.

Distribution of IgG subclass anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Our study purpose was to detect the distribution of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) IgG subclasses in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate their influence on the inflammatory process in SLE. METHODS: We determined the serum levels of ANA IgG subclasses from 70 SLE patients, 25 patients with other autoimmune diseases (OAD), and 25 healthy controls using ELISA. The serum level of total ANA IgG and the avidity of ANA IgG, dsDNA IgG, and dsDNA IgG subclasses were analysed by ELISA. RESULTS: The results indicated that levels of four ANA IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4) and total IgG were significantly higher in SLE patients than in OAD patients and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Moreover, the level of each ANA IgG subclass and the prevalence of high-avidity IgG ANAs (HA IgG ANAs) were significantly higher in the active cases than in the inactive cases of SLE and LN. Furthermore, level of ANA IgG subclasses decreased as level of dsDNA IgG subclasses decreased in 30 patients with SLE. In comparison, ANA IgG3 was significantly effective in high-dose prednisone combined with hydroxychloroquine (p = 0.025). Additionally, it revealed that level of dsDNA IgG had a significant influence on four ANA IgG subclasses, especially on ANA IgG3 (ß coefficient = 0.649, p < 0.001). Level of ANA IgG3 was also positively related to the serum level of dsDNA IgG (r = 0.729, p < 0.001) and RAI of HA IgG ANAs (r = 0.504, p < 0.001). However, the level of ANA IgG4 was positively related to the serum level of albumin (r = 0.572, p < 0.001) and RAI of HA IgG ANAs (r = 0.549, p < 0.001). Moreover, the results revealed that cutaneous and renal involvement were mainly associated with the ANA IgG1 and IgG4 subclasses. Although, arthritic involvement was mainly associated with ANA IgG3. CONCLUSIONS: First, we demonstrated that the ANA IgG subclasses were diagnostic tools in SLE patients. Furthermore, HA IgG ANAs might affect the distribution of ANA IgG3 and IgG4. Moreover, ANA IgG3 might play a particular role in the activity of SLE disease and therapy. Therefore, an altered ANA IgG subclass distribution might be a risk factor influencing the inflammatory process in SLE.

Assessment of a high-avidity IgG ANAs for the diagnosis and activity prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence value of a high-avidity antinuclear antibody (ANA) of the IgG isotype (HA IgG ANA) compared with that of ANAs of other isotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to assess the associations of HA IgG ANA with the activity of SLE and lupus nephritis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from subjects. Blood samples were acquired from 101 SLE patients, 67 patients with other autoimmune diseases, and 65 healthy donors. The levels of HA IgG ANA and other isotype ANAs were measured by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). The prevalence and diagnosis value of HA IgG ANA and other antibodies in SLE patient were tested. The advantage of HA IgG ANA compared with HA anti-dsDNA antibodies IgG (HA dsDNA IgG) was verified by ELISA. We monitored the relative avidity indexes (RAIs) of HA IgG ANA and HA dsDNA IgG at 3 time points after the start of treatment in the same individuals with SLE. RESULTS: The prevalence of HA IgG ANA was significantly higher in active cases than in inactive cases of SLE and LN, which is consistent with data for IgG ANAs, anti-dsDNA IgG antibodies, low C3 levels, low C4 levels, and anti-C1q antibodies. HA IgG ANA showed moderate sensitivity and specificity (80% and 81.3%) for discriminating active and inactive SLE cases. However, HA IgG ANA showed no significant differences among the different clinical manifestations of SLE. Compared with that of HA dsDNA IgG, the RAI of HA IgG ANA was positively related to SLEDAI scores after treatment at 0, 1, and 3 months (r = 0.6813, p = 0.0026; r = 0.5972, p = 0.0114; r = 0.4817, p = 0.0474). CONCLUSIONS: First, we demonstrated that HA IgG ANA was a reliable diagnostic tool in SLE patients. Furthermore, HA IgG ANA was supposed to be more appropriate for identifying the activity of SLE compared with HA dsDNA IgG. In summary, HA IgG ANA may be a new biomarker for diagnosing SLE and identifying SLE activity. Key Points • We first introduced the concept of a "high-avidity IgG ANA (HA IgG ANA)" that could distinguish between the early stage of SLE and SLE that had been active for some time. • The relative avidity indexes (RAIs) of HA IgG ANA and HA dsDNA IgG were presented and applied here to evaluate the avidities of antibodies involved in SLE. • In our study, we confirmed the value of HA IgG ANA in diagnosing SLE. In addition, HA IgG ANA was more appropriate for identifying the activity of SLE than was HA dsDNA IgG. • In conclusion, HA IgG ANA could be a potential biomarker for the assessment of the prognosis of SLE activity.