Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 365, 2023 11 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37936081

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of a single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery. METHODS: Forty patients, 25 males and 15 females, aged 18-85 years with ASA class I or II underwent unilateral clavicular fracture internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into a superficial cervical plexus block group (group S, n = 20) and a superficial cervical fascia block group (group F, n = 20). First, the brachial plexus of the intermuscular sulcus of all patients was blocked with an ultrasound-guided injection of one injection with 15ml 0.33% ropivacaine 15ml in both groups. Second, the superficial cervical plexus was blocked by another injection of 5-8ml 0.33% ropivacaine in group S, and the superficial cervical fascia was blocked by an injection with 5-8ml 0.33% ropivacaine in Group F. We evaluated operation time, onset time of anaesthesia, effective time and the grades of nerve block effect in the two groups. Additionally, we evaluated the incidences of local anaesthetic poisoning, hoarseness, dyspnoea, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the number of patients requiring remedial analgesia within 24 h. Repeated measurements were analysed by repeated data analysis of variance, and count data were compared by the χ2 test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The operation time and onset time in Group F were significantly shorter than those in group S (P < 0.05); the effect of intraoperative block was better than that in group S (P < 0.05), and the effective time was significantly longer in group F than in group S (P < 0.05). However, no severe case of dyspnoea, local anaesthetic poisoning or hoarseness after anaesthesia occurred in either of two groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative salvage analgesia or that of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery is beneficial because it shortens the operation time, has a faster onset, produces a more effective block and prolongs the longer analgesia time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry- ChiCTR2200064642(13/10/2022).


Assuntos
Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial , Bloqueio do Plexo Cervical , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anestésicos Locais , Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial/métodos , Dispneia , Fáscia , Rouquidão , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Ropivacaina , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
2.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 111: 109067, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35908503

RESUMO

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is a common complication of sepsis and is the main reason for the high mortality in sepsis patients. More recent studies have indicated that activating nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling plays a protective role in SIC. As a potent activator of Nrf2, Omaveloxolone plays a pivotal role in defending against oxidative stress and the inflammatory response. Thus, we examined the efficacy of omaveloxolone in SIC. In the present study, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of LPS (10 mg/kg) for 12 h to induce SIC. The data in our study indicated that omaveloxolone administration significantly improved cardiac injury and dysfunction in LPS-induced SIC. In addition, omaveloxolone administration reduced SIC-related cardiac oxidative stress, the inflammatory response and cardiomyocyte apoptosis in mice. In addition, omaveloxolone administration also improved LPS-induced cardiomyocyte injury in an in vitro model using H9C2 cells. Moreover, knockdown of Nrf2 by si-Nrf2 abolished the omaveloxolone-mediated cardioprotective effects. In conclusion, omaveloxolone has potent cardioprotective potential in treating sepsis and SIC via activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Sepse , Animais , Camundongos , Apoptose , Cardiomiopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Cardiomiopatias/etiologia , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Fator 2 Relacionado a NF-E2/metabolismo , Estresse Oxidativo , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Triterpenos
3.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 21(3): 397-402, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22428495

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sex of female and laraproscopic surgery are both risk factors related to postoperative nausea and vomiting, and dexamethasone is used as anti-emetic in some operations. A meta-analysis of randomized trials was performed to determine the effect of prophylactic dexamethasone administration on postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain and complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological operation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all randomized clinical trials. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The secondary outcomes include postoperative pain and complications. RESULTS: Totally 1801 patients were enrolled in 11 eligible randomized trials comparing effect of prophylactic dexamethasone administration on postoperative nausea and vomiting with placebo. The pooled incidence of nausea, vomiting, nausea and vomiting, and rescue anti-emetic was significantly lower in dexamethasone group than placebo group during post-anesthesia care unit (10.5% vs. 18.2%, OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.84; 6.5% vs. 17.1%, OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17-0.56; 17.0% vs. 35.4%, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.50; 6.7% vs. 23.3%, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.49, P < 0.00001) and within the first postoperative 24 hours (25.2% vs. 40.3%, OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.66; 14.4% vs 36.6%, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19-0.40; 33.0% vs. 69.0%, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.13-0.26; 21.0% vs 51.1%, OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.16-0.41, P < 0.00001). No significant difference was found about the incidence of rescue analgesia between dexamethasone group and placebo group (48.5% vs 56.4%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.18, P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic dexamethasone administration decreases the incidence of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynecological operations during post-anesthesia care unit and within the first postoperative 24 hours. (286 words) Postoperative nausea and vomiting are the most common complications after anesthesia and surgery, and both sex of female and type of laparoscopic operation are risk factors. It is certain of a remarkably high incidence after laparoscopic gynecological surgery, which is reported as nearly 70% within the first postoperative 24 hours. It is very important to find an effective treatment to alleviate postoperative nausea and vomiting.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Laparoscopia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fumar/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...