Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 525, 2024 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982406

RESUMO

Pediatric ankle injuries are common; ankle epiphyseal fractures are also common in children. But isolated distal epiphyseal fibular fractures of the distal fibula are clinically rare. We describe one unusual case of an adolescent with a completely displaced Salter-Harris type II distal fibular epiphyseal fracture. The attempt of closed reduction failed, and the patient required open reduction and internal fixation. The localized periosteum and the superior peroneal retinaculum were avulsed from the distal fibular metaphysis, with the peroneal tendons underneath exposed but no obvious subluxation. To the best of our knowledge, this combination of injuries has not been previously reported.


Assuntos
Epífises , Fíbula , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fíbula/lesões , Fíbula/cirurgia , Fíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Epífises/lesões , Epífises/cirurgia , Epífises/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Redução Aberta/métodos , Feminino
2.
PLoS One ; 9(4): e94601, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24732053

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological studies have shown that fish consumption may modify the risk of ovarian cancer. However, these studies yielded controversial results. The present meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between fish intake and ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: A literature search was carried out using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central database for all relevant studies up to August 2013. We pooled the relative risks (RR) from individual studies using fixed-effect or random-effect model, and carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: A total of 15 (ten case-control, and five cohort) studies were included in the present meta-analysis, representing data for 889,033 female subjects and 6,087 ovarian cancer cases. We found that total fish intake was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer among cohort studies (RR = 1.04 95% CI [0.89, 1.22]) as well as case-control studies (RR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.73,1.12]). There was no evidence of publication bias as suggested by Begg's test (P = 0.55) and Egger's test(P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed that total fish consumption was not significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer. Further analysis on different fish species and food preparation methods should be conducted in future studies.


Assuntos
Dieta , Produtos Pesqueiros , Neoplasias Ovarianas/etiologia , Animais , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Peixes , Geografia , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Razão de Chances , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...