Safety and efficacy of minimal transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a preferred treatment for patients with highly critical aortic stenosis (AS), which is a difficult and complicated procedure, leaving a heavy economical burden on patients and national health insurance. Minimalist TAVR can simplify a part of the operation procedures, but the surgical efficacy and safety are still under debated. OBJECTIVES: Explore the effectiveness and safety of minimalist TAVR in the treatment of patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted for studies involving application of minimalist TAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis, two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 software. RESULTS: Nine studies, involving a total of 3,148 AS patients, were included. Minimalist TAVR has similar surgical success rates compared to standardized TAVR, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, dosage of contrast agent, and total operative time were superior to standard TAVR. Regarding surgical complications, the incidence of permanent pacemaker placement and moderate to severe paravalvular leakage were similar for both TAVR, the risk of major vascular complications and major bleeding events in the minimalist TAVR was significantly lower than the standard TAVR. The risk of overall death, stroke, and cardiovascular-related readmission within 30 days was similar in both procedures. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with minimalist TAVR have similar short-term efficacy as well as 30-day clinical outcomes to standard TAVR, while minimalist TAVR could reduce the risk of major vascular complications and bleeding complications.

The impact of early in-hospital use of PCSK9 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and assess the cardiovascular impact of early in-hospital administration of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted for studies involving the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in ACS patients from inception to October 2023. Two independent researchers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 software. RESULTS: Nine studies, encompassing a total of 2896 ACS patients, were included in the analysis. When compared to statin monotherapy, early administration of PCSK9 inhibitors during hospitalization for ACS proved effective in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). This encompassed a decrease in coronary revascularization [Relative Risk (RR) = 0.78, 95% CI (0.62, 0.98), P < 0.05], recurrent ACS [RR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.42, 0.94), P < 0.05], readmissions due to unstable angina [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.59, 0.85), P < 0.01], and strokes [RR = 0.31, 95% CI (0.09, 1.04), P = 0.058]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of death between the two groups.The use of PCSK9 inhibitors notably hastened the reduction of LDL-C, TG, and Non HDL-C levels in the short term. Additionally, it increased HDL-C levels and the number of individuals meeting LDL-C compliance criteria. Importantly, the risk of adverse drug events, such as ALT increase >3xULN, allergies, and musculoskeletal pain, did not significantly elevate with PCSK9 inhibitor use. CONCLUSION: The early administration of PCSK9 inhibitors has been found to safely and effectively lower diverse lipid levels in patients with ACS. This reduction is associated with a noteworthy decrease in MACEs, encompassing revascularization, recurrent ACS, and hospital readmissions.