Comparison of catheter-directed thrombolysis with and without percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the treatment efficacy and safety between catheter-directed thrombolysis monotherapy and catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for patients with subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a total of 74 subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis with and without percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy group, n = 30) or catheter-directed thrombolysis monotherapy (catheter-directed thrombolysis group, n = 44) were included. The primary endpoints were the clinical efficacy rate of thrombolysis, primary patency, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (at 12 months diagnosed according to the original Villalta score criteria. Secondary endpoints were the total urokinase dose, the thrombolysis time, the detumescence rate and complications. RESULTS: The percentage of successful thrombolysis for percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy group was higher than that for catheter-directed thrombolysis group (P = 0.045). At the 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in the primary patency (P > 0.05) or the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (P = 0.36). Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy group had significant advantages in reducing urokinase doses and thrombolysis times compared with catheter-directed thrombolysis group for patients with thrombus clearance levels II and III (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy performs better in removing vein thrombi, reducing urokinase doses, and shortening thrombolysis times.

Preventive Effects of Different Drugs on Asymptomatic Lower Extremities Deep Venous Thrombosis After Artificial Joint Replacement: A Mixed Treatment Comparison.

This network meta-analysis aims to compare the preventive effects of 8 drugs (edoxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, bemiparin, ximelagatran, and enoxaparin) on asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities after artificial joint replacement. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from their inception through October 2015 for randomized controlled trials comparing 8 drugs for the prevention of asymptomatic DVT of lower extremities after artificial joint replacement. Network meta-analysis combined the direct and indirect evidence to evaluate odd ratios (ORs) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves values. A total of 15 randomized controlled trials satisfying the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had poorer preventive effects on asymptomatic DVT of lower extremities after undergoing artificial joint replacement when compared with warfarin [OR = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.60; OR = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.07-0.64; OR = 0.16, 95% CI, 0.05-0.49, respectively]. When compared with enoxaparin, the preventive effects of edoxaban and rivaroxaban were poorer (OR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.15-0.85; OR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.21-0.59, respectively). The preventive effects of edoxaban and rivaroxaban were poorer than dabigatran (OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.14-0.99; OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.18-0.73, respectively). The surface under the cumulative ranking curves values showed that warfarin had better preventive effects on asymptomatic DVT of lower extremities after undergoing artificial joint replacement. Among the 8 drugs (edoxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, bemiparin, ximelagatran, and enoxaparin), warfarin had better preventive effects on asymptomatic DVT of lower extremities after undergoing artificial joint replacement.

Treatment strategies and indications for interventional management of pseudoaneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoaneurysms (PAs) are common vascular abnormalities predominantly arising from a disruption in the integrity of the arterial wall. The potential complications of PAs are usually unpredictable and carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. This paper presents our experience with various treatment strategies for PAs. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with 55 PAs were diagnosed by non-invasive imaging examination. The etiology of PAs included trauma (33/55), infection (5/55), iatrogenic (6/55), and idiopathic (11/55). Different procedures including ultrasound (US)-guided compression, endovascular treatment, and surgery were performed depending on the location of PAs, size of the sac and neck, and characteristics of the donor artery. The methods of endovascular treatment included embolization of parent artery, the PA sac, or implantation of a stent-graft. Follow-up was performed using US or CT and ranged from 1 day to 24 months (average 16.7 months). RESULTS: In all 54 patients, 3 patients with superficial PAs were treated by US-guided compression, while 44 patients with 45 PAs located in the head and neck (n = 20), viscera (n = 10) or extremities (n = 15) were treated by endovascular treatment. Nine patients with PAs located in the head and neck (n = 2) or extremities (n = 7) were treated by surgery. Among them, one patient underwent endovascular treatment combined with surgery and 1 was treated by surgery after unsuccessful US-guided compression. In the 3 patients treated with US-guided compression, 2 were successfully treated while the remaining patient required additional surgery. Primary technical success of endovascular management was 97.7% (43/44) and the cure rate was 95.5% (42/44). In the surgery group, 4 patients recovered well, 1 patient was cured by endovascular treatment combined with surgery, 2 cases underwent amputation, 1 patient died of multi-organ failure and 1 patient was paralysed. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive interventional techniques are established treatment methods for PA with favorable success rates and minimal morbidity. The therapeutic options should be tailored to the location, size and rupture risk of PA, condition of the donor artery and existing comorbidity.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty as a treatment for painful osteoblastic metastatic spinal lesions.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been used widely to treat pain caused by osteolytic spinal lesions, whereas vertebroplasty for osteoblastic spinal lesions is less known. The purpose of this study is to describe PVP as a highly effective miniinvasive procedure to treat painful osteoblastic metastatic spinal lesions. Four patients with painful osteoblastic metastatic spinal lesions were treated by PVP in the authors' department, and immediately relief of pain was achieved in all of them. The findings from this study may encourage more studies of PVP in palliative treatment of patients with osteoblastic lesions.

Cerebral lipiodol embolism following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of two cases and literature review.

Cerebral lipiodol embolism (CLE) is an extremely rare complication of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. To our knowledge, only 11 cases have been previously reported. We recently encountered two cases of CLE in our clinical work. Reviewing the 11 cases in the literature and the two cases in our report indicates that large dose lipiodol infusion and absence of particulate embolization should be avoided. The presence of a right-to-left shunt and inferior phrenic artery injection seems to increase the risk of CLE. More caution should be taken in these situations.