Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Knee Surg ; 36(12): 1289-1296, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35944566

RESUMO

We explored the efficacy of an interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block when added to an established enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway to assist with posterior knee analgesia and functional mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We recruited participants undergoing TKA in our prospective, randomized, triple-blinded controlled trial. All study patients participated in our ERAS pathway consisting of a primary spinal anesthetic, adductor canal nerve catheter, and periarticular joint infiltration. Patients were randomized to receive an IPACK block or no block. The primary outcome was total postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, recovery unit length of stay, time to first opioid use, the incidence of posterior knee pain, ambulation distance and activities of daily living on postoperative day 1, and hospital length of stay. A total of 96 patients were randomized to the control and IPACK groups. There were no statistical differences in primary or majority of secondary outcomes. There was a lower incidence of posterior knee pain (39%) in the IPACK group when compared with controls (8.7%), p < 0.01. In terms of opioid consumption and a majority of functional outcomes, our study demonstrates no overall benefits of adding an IPACK block in this ERAS pathway in TKA. Nevertheless, IPACK may have the potential of mitigating posterior knee pain after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level 1. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL: NCT03653416. www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Bloqueio Nervoso , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Atividades Cotidianas , Anestésicos Locais , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia
2.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19606, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34926075

RESUMO

We present two patients who underwent double mastectomy and breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The goal of this case series was to compare surgeon-provided infiltration block against anesthesiologist-provided regional nerve block, focusing on abdominal analgesia. This case report highlights that pain control for a patient could be successful when done collaboratively. To achieve this, it is important for both the surgical and anesthesia team to discuss the best analgesic plan for the patient while taking into consideration the confidence, experience, and technique that both the surgical and anesthesiology team can offer.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...