[The predictive value of ureteral wall area for impacted ureteral stones].

Objective: To investigate the clinical indicators for preoperative prediction of impacted ureteral stones and analyze the predictive value of ureteral wall area(UWA). Methods: A total of 197 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy due to ureteral stones at our institution from January to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, side of stone, location of stone, maximum diameter of stone, CT value of stone, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, renal pelvis diameter, ureteral wall thickness and UWA were collected. Patients were divided into impacted and non-impacted groups according to whether the stones were impacted intraoperatively. Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences in each clinical indicator between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the independent predictors of impacted stones for those with differences. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive power of each independent predictor, and the Delong test was used to analyze whether the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) of each independent predictor was statistically significant. Results: All 197 patients successfully completed the operation, aged 51 (36, 56) years; 137 males and 60 females. According to the results of ureteroscopy, they were divided into 82 cases of impacted ureteral stones and 115 cases of non-impacted ureteral stones. Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in maximum stone diameter, stone CT value, renal pelvis diameter, ureteral wall thickness and ureteral wall area between the two groups (P<0.05); There was no significant difference in age, gender, BMI, history of hypertension, diabetes, stone side, location of stone, CRP and creatinine (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that stone CT value (P<0.01), ureteral wall thickness (P<0.001) and ureteral wall area were independent predictors of impacted ureteral stones (P<0.001). The ROC curve was used to compare the predictive efficacy of independent predictors of stone CT value, ureteral wall thickness and ureteral wall area. The area under the ureteral wall area curve was the largest (AUC = 0.901, 95%CI: 0.859-0.943, P<0.001), followed by ureteral wall thickness (AUC = 0.799, 95%CI: 0.736-0.862, P<0.001) and stone CT value (AUC = 0.700, 95%CI: 0.626-0.775, P<0.001). By Delong test, there were significant differences in AUC between ureteral wall area and stone CT value (Z=4.527, P<0.001) and ureteral wall thickness (Z=3.407, P<0.001). The best predictive value of ureteral wall area was 79.6 mm2. The sensitivity and specificity of this critical value for predicting ureteral incarcerated calculi were 80.1% and 89.5%. Conclusions: The UWA, ureteral wall thickness as well as the CT value of stones were all independent predictors of impacted ureteral stones, and UWA had a better predictive value.

Identification of serum exosomal miR-148a as a novel prognostic biomarker for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignanciesD. Li, J. Wang, L.-J. Ma, H.-B. Yang, J.-F. Jing, M.-M. Jia, X.-J. Zhang, F. Guo, J.-N. Gao affecting females. Aberrant expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) has been associated with carcinogenesis of BC. The aim of our study was to investigate the correlation of serum exosomal miR-148a expression and the clinical outcome of patients with BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quantitative Real Time-Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) was applied to evaluate the expression level of serum exosomal miR-148a in patients with BC, patients with benign breast tumors, and healthy controls. Then, the clinical value of serum exosomal miR-148a in BC was evaluated. RESULTS: Serum exosomal miR-148a levels were gradually downregulated from healthy controls patients with benign breast tumors to BC patients. Serum exosomal miR-148a could well distinguish BC patients from healthy volunteers. The expression level of serum exosomal miR-148a in BC patients was significantly upregulated following surgery, while dropped in the cases with disease relapse. A significant association was found between serum exosomal miR-148a levels and the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, differentiation, and lymph node metastasis in BC. In addition, BC patients with lower expression of serum exosomal miR-148a levels suffered worse overall survival and disease-free survival than those with higher expression of serum exosomal miR-148a levels. Furthermore, serum exosomal miR-148a was an independent risk factor for BC. CONCLUSIONS: Our data have demonstrated that serum exosomal miR-148a is significantly reduced in patients with BC and downregulation of serum exosomal miR-148a is closely associated with unfavorable clinical outcome of BC, indicating that serum exosomal miR-148a might serve as a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for BC.