RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of B-ultrasound-guided puncture in the treatment of incision infection after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and to provide references for the clinical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 116 patients with uterine incision infection after TAH were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 58 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received an intravenous drip of ceftazidime and tinidazole to prevent infection, and the patients in the observation group received B-ultrasound-guided puncture treatment on the basis of the treatment plan of the control group. The clinical therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The cure rate of excellence in the observation group was 84.48%, and the cure rate in the control group was 53.45%, while the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 98.28%, and that in the control group was 87.93%, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The hospital stay was (9.5±1.6) days in the observation group and (12.3±2.1) days in the control group, and the mean hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAH should be performed on patients when they are in the best physical condition, and strictly according to the operation steps to reduce the duration of surgery. The application of B-ultrasound-guided puncture can effectively improve the excellent recovery rate of the incision infection after TAH and shorten the hospitalization time. It is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
