Reoperation depending on time period following pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate time-dependent rates and indications of unplanned reoperation and to evaluate the most common indication depending on the time interval after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: A total of 321 consecutive patients with AS (284 men; mean age 43.8 years) with thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent PSO were included. Patients who underwent reoperation after the index surgery were divided according to the duration of the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (15.9%) underwent unplanned reoperations. The reoperation groups had greater preoperative and postoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and less lordotic postoperative osteotomy angle (-4.3° ± 18.6° vs -15.0° ± 13.7°, p < 0.001). The perioperative change in SVA was not significantly different between groups (-10.0 ± 7.1 cm vs -10.0 ± 5.1 cm, p = 0.970), while that in the osteotomy angle was significantly different (-22.4° ± 21.3° vs -30.0° ± 11.5°, p = 0.014). Most reoperations (45.1%; 23/51) were performed within 2 weeks of the initial operation. Within 2 weeks, the most common cause of reoperation was neurological deficit in 10 patients, with a cumulative reoperation rate of 3.2%. After 3 years, the most common complications were mechanical complications in 8 patients, accounting for 15.7% (8/51) of patients. Overall, the most common indications for reoperation were mechanical complications (17 patients; 5.3%), followed by neurological deficits (12 patients; 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: PSO may be the most effective surgical procedure for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with AS. However, 51 patients (15.9%) required an unplanned reoperation.

Does Degeneration of the Patellofemoral Joint After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Affect Clinical Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Although biomechanical and clinical studies have reported adverse effects on the patellofemoral joint after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), there is a paucity of literature that describes outcomes longer than midterm follow-up. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the mid- to long-term radiologic and clinical outcomes of the patellofemoral joint after MOWHTO and to assess whether radiologic deterioration of the patellofemoral joint affected clinical outcomes or survivorship after MOWHTO. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 170 knees that underwent MOWHTO and had a minimum 5-year follow-up. In radiologic evaluation, serial postoperative changes in the patellofemoral joint compared with the preoperative status were evaluated on the Merchant view according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grade. The American Knee Society (AKS) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala score, incidence of anterior knee pain, and survivorship were used to assess clinical outcomes. Using radiologic assessment of the patellofemoral joint, we divided the patients into a radiologic progression group and a radiologic nonprogression group to evaluate whether radiologic progression of patellofemoral arthritis affected long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after MOWHTO. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 96.3 months (range, 60-163 months). Arthritic progression of the patellofemoral joint on the Merchant view was observed in 44.9%, 56.3%, 66.0%, and 84.0% of the cases at 5, 7, 9, and 11 years, respectively. Clinical outcomes such as AKS scores and KOOS significantly improved after MOWHTO (P < .001) at the latest follow-up. The incidence of anterior knee pain was 5.3% (9/170 knees). One knee (0.6%) underwent conversion to TKA due to progressive medial osteoarthritis, so the survival rate was 99.4% at a mean follow-up of 96.3 months. Despite patellofemoral degeneration over time, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or survivorship between patients with and without radiologic progression at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although degeneration of the patellofemoral joint was observed with time after MOWHTO, the related symptoms were minimal and arthritic changes in the patellofemoral joint did not affect the clinical outcomes or survivorship after MOWHTO over a mid- to long-term follow-up.

Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients With Radiological Kissing Lesion.

Background: Although medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is the treatment of choice for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis with varus malalignment, concerns about inferior outcomes in patients with preoperative radiological kissing lesion (RKL) remain. Purpose: To compare the mid- to long-term clinical and radiological results and survivorship after MOWHTO in patients with versus without preoperative RKL. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were 122 knees in patients who underwent MOWHTO with a medial locked plate and had minimum 5-year follow-up data. The mean age at surgery was 55.9 years (range, 38-65 years), and the mean follow-up was 7.5 years (range, 5-12.8 years). All patients had undergone second-look arthroscopy around 2 years after MOWHTO. The knees were divided into an RKL group (n = 17) and no-RKL group (n = 105) based on preoperative standing radiographs. The authors compared postoperative American Knee Society (AKS) knee and function scores, range of motion, and improvements in AKS scores between groups, as well as hip-knee-ankle angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint-line convergence angle from preoperatively to postoperatively. Also compared were the degree of cartilage regeneration between first- and second-look arthroscopy and the survival rate after index surgery. Results: Preoperative AKS scores were significantly lower in the RKL group versus the no-RKL group (AKS knee, 79.6 ± 7.5 vs 83.8 ± 3.9, P = .037; AKS function, 68.8 ± 9.3 vs 76.0 ± 5.1, P = .006). Likewise, postoperative AKS scores were significantly lower in the RKL group versus the no-RKL group (AKS knee: 91.3 ± 4.2 vs 94.4 ± 1.6, respectively, P = .008; AKS function: 90.0 ± 10.0 vs 97.6 ± 4.5, respectively, P = .007). However, all patients had excellent postoperative AKS knee and function scores (>80). Moreover, there were no between-group differences in pre- to postoperative improvement in AKS scores, postoperative radiological changes, or grade of cartilage regeneration. The survival rates in the RKL and no-RKL groups were 100% and 97.1%, respectively (P ≥ .999). Conclusion: Although the latest clinical scores were lower in the RKL group than in the no-RKL group, comparable results in postoperative clinical improvement, cartilage regeneration, and survivorship were observed in patients with RKL at mid- to long-term follow-up.