Right and left liver lobe biopsies by minilaparoscopy reveal clinically significant sampling error in staging and grading of autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Liver diseases may affect the liver heterogeneously, especially in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the added benefit of double biopsy of both liver lobes during minilaparoscopy in guiding treatment decisions in patients with AIH. METHODS: We identified all patients with AIH or variant syndromes (AIH/PBC and AIH/PSC) at our center, who underwent a double biopsy of both liver lobes via minilaparoscopy between 01/2016 and 12/2020. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients received a biopsy of both liver lobes (AIH: N = 83, AIH/PBC: N = 26, AIH/PSC: N = 7). Differences in inflammatory activity as assessed by Ishaks's modified hepatitis activity index (mHAI) were observed in 72 (63%) patients. The difference was ≥2/18 points and ≥3/18 points in 32 (28%) and 11 (10%) patients, respectively. Starting or intensification of immunosuppression should be discussed at a mHAI of 4-5, while a mHAI≥6 prompts intensified immunosuppression in most cases. In 19/114 (17%) and 17/114 (15%) patients mHAI ≥4 or ≥6 was found in only one liver lobe, respectively. In ten patients, severe fibrosis (≥F3) was only found in one liver biopsy. Overall, therapeutically relevant histological differences were observed in 39/114 (34%) patients, which had a direct impact on treatment decisions in 24 patients (21%). No major adverse outcome occurred by taking biopsies from both liver lobes. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining a double biopsy of both liver lobes is a safe procedure during minilaparoscopy that results in more accurate grading and staging and that may impact on treatment decisions in patients with AIH.

A multiplex protein panel assay determines disease severity and is prognostic about outcome in COVID-19 patients

Global healthcare systems continue to be challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is a need for clinical assays that can both help to optimize resource allocation and accelerate the development and evaluation of new therapies. Here, we present a multiplex proteomic panel assay for the assessment of disease severity and outcome prediction in COVID-19. The assay quantifies 50 peptides derived from 30 COVID-19 severity markers in a single measurement using analytical flow rate liquid chromatography and multiple reaction monitoring (LC-MRM), on equipment that is broadly available in routine and regulated analytical laboratories. We demonstrate accurate classification of COVID-19 severity in patients from two cohorts. Furthermore, the assay outperforms established risk assessments such as SOFA and APACHE II in predicting survival in a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort. The prognostic value implies its use for support of clinical decisions in settings with overstrained healthcare resources e.g. to optimally allocate resources to severely ill individuals with high chance of survival. It can furthermore be helpful for monitoring of novel therapies in clinical trials.