Whole-brain Radiotherapy With or Without a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Treatment of Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with brain metastases receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), despite the increasing use of stereotactic radiotherapy alone. A more recent approach includes WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT+SIB). This study compared WBRT alone and WBRT+SIB for unresected brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred-and-three patients receiving WBRT+SIB were compared to 275 patients receiving WBRT alone for intracerebral control (IC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Both treatment groups (WBRT alone and WBRT+SIB) were balanced with respect to patient characteristics. On multivariate analyses, WBRT+SIB (p=0.041), Karnofsky performance score (KPS) >70 (p<0.001), and 1-3 brain metastases (p=0.016) were significantly associated with IC. KPS >70 (p<0.001), favorable tumor type (p=0.011), 1-3 brain metastases (p=0.011), and absence of extracranial metastases (p<0.001) were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION: WBRT+SIB is associated with improved IC but similar OS when directly compared to WBRT for brain metastases. Selected patients with a high risk of intracerebral recurrence may benefit from SIB.

Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with High Biologically Effective Doses for Large Brain Metastases.

In Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-05, the maximum tolerated dose of single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases of 21-30 mm was 18 Gy (biologically effective dose (BED) 45 Gy12). Since the patients in this study received prior brain irradiation, tolerable BED may be >45 Gy12 for de novo lesions. We investigated SRS and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) with a higher BED for radiotherapy-naive lesions. Patients receiving SRS (19-20 Gy) and patients treated with FSRT (30-48 Gy in 3-12 fractions) with BED > 49 Gy12 for up to 4 brain metastases were compared for grade ≥ 2 radiation necrosis (RN). In the entire cohort (169 patients with 218 lesions), 1-year and 2-year RN rates were 8% after SRS vs. 2% and 13% after FSRT (p = 0.73) in per-patient analyses, and 7% after SRS vs. 7% and 10% after FSRT (p = 0.59) in per-lesion analyses. For lesions ≤ 20 mm (137 patients with 185 lesions), the RN rates were 4% (SRS) vs. 0% and 15%, respectively, (FSRT) (p = 0.60) in per-patient analyses, and 3% (SRS) vs. 0% and 11%, respectively, (FSRT) (p = 0.80) in per-lesion analyses. For lesions > 20 mm (32 patients with 33 lesions), the RN rates were 50% (SRS) vs. 9% (FSRT) (p = 0.012) in both per-patient and per-lesion analyses. In the SRS group, a lesion size > 20 mm was significantly associated with RN; in the FSRT group, lesion size had no impact on RN. Given the limitations of this study, FSRT with BED > 49 Gy12 was associated with low RN risk and may be safer than SRS for brain metastases > 20 mm.

Treatment Outcomes After Higher-dose Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) Alone for 1-4 Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) is increasingly used for brain metastases. We investigated higher-dose FSRT with biologically effective doses (BED) of 49.6-66.7 Gy12 Patients and Methods: Eleven characteristics were evaluated for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and freedom from radiation necrosis (RN) in 69 patients with 1-4 brain metastases. Fifty-seven patients (83%) had extracranial metastases, 23 (33%) Karnofsky performance scores (KPS) ≤70, and 21 (30%) brain metastases ≥21 mm. RESULTS: At 1 and 2 years, LC-rates were 81% and 63%, OS-rates 66% and 43%, and freedom from RN-rates 98% and 87%, respectively. Median time to local progression was 35 months, median survival 19 months. KPS ≥90 was associated with better OS (p=0.048). BED of 49.6-57 Gy12 (vs. 63-66.7 Gy12) was associated with higher rates of freedom from RN (p=0.046), not with LC (p=0.78) or OS (p=0.55). CONCLUSION: Higher-dose FSRT appears feasible and effective in patients with 1-4 brain metastases. BED 63-66.7 Gy12 may not improve LC and OS but may increase RN risk.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy or Whole-Brain Irradiation Plus Simultaneous Integrated Boost After Resection of Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Most patients with resected brain metastases receive post-operative radiotherapy. This study investigated outcomes of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) alone or whole-brain irradiation plus simultaneous integrated boost (WBI+SIB) in the post-operative setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients receiving FSRT alone (n=32) or WBI+SIB (n=12) after resection of 1-3 brain metastases from 2014-2022 were analyzed. Twelve factors were evaluated for local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: On univariate and multivariate analyses, single brain metastasis was associated with improved LC and DBC. Longer interval between tumor diagnosis and radiotherapy, single brain metastasis, and Karnofsky performance score >80 were associated with improved OS. WBI+SIB showed a trend towards better DBC. CONCLUSION: Several independent predictors of outcomes after FSRT or WBI+SIB following resection of brain metastases were identified. Given similar survival in the post-operative setting between FSRT and WBI+SIB, potential toxicity remains a significant factor in treatment recommendations.

The First Survival Score for Patients Treated with Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Brain Metastases.

A modern approach for brain metastases includes whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous boost (WBRT+SIB). We developed a survival score in 128 patients treated with WBRT+SIB. Three models, each including three prognostic groups, were created. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were calculated. On multivariate analyses, performance score (KPS) and the number of brain metastases were significantly associated with survival. On univariate analyses, age showed a strong trend, and extra-cerebral cranial metastases a trend. In Model 1 (KPS, number of lesions), compared groups had 6-month survival rates of 15%, 38% and 57%. In Model 2 (KPS, lesions, age), rates were 17%, 33% and 75%, and in Model 3 (KPS, lesions, age, extra-cerebral metastases), 14%, 34% and 78%. PPVs for death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were 85% and 57% (Model 1), 83% and 75% (Model 2), and 86% and 78% (Model 3). Thus, all models were accurate in predicting death ≤ 6 months; poor-prognosis patients may not benefit from SIB. Models 2 and 3 were superior in predicting survival ≥ 6 months. Given that Model 3 requires more data (including extensive staging), Model 2 is considered favorable for many patients. If extra-cerebral metastases are already known or extensive staging has been performed, Model 3 can also be used.