Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 162, 2024 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Telephone triage is used to optimise patient flow in emergency primary healthcare. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings and compromise patient safety. To improve quality, a comprehensive understanding of factors affecting communication in medical call centres in primary care is needed. The aim of this review was to identify such factors and to describe how they affect communication during telephone triage. METHOD: A mixed-method systematic review was performed. In April 2021 and June 2023, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for original studies describing communication during telephone triage in primary care medical call centres handling all types of medical problems from an unselected population. All studies were screened by two authors, blinded to each other's decisions. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. A framework was created by the thematic synthesis of the qualitative data and later used to synthesise the quantitative data. By using convergent integrated synthesis, the qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological limitations. RESULTS: Out of 5087 studies identified in the search, 62 studies were included, comprising 40 qualitative, 16 quantitative and six mixed-method studies. Thirteen factors were identified and organised into four main themes: organisational factors, factors related to the operator, factors related to the caller and factors in the interaction. Organisational factors included availability, working conditions and decision support systems. Factors related to the operator were knowledge and experience, personal qualities and communication strategies. Factors related to the caller were individual differences and the presented medical problem. Factors in the interaction were faceless communication, connection between operator and caller, third-person caller and communication barriers. The factors seem interrelated, with organisational factors affecting all parts of the conversation, and the operator's communication in particular. CONCLUSION: Many factors affect the structure, content, and flow of the conversation. The operators influence the communication directly but rely on the organisation to create a working environment that facilitates good communication. The results are mainly supported by qualitative studies and further studies are needed to explore and substantiate the relevance and effect of individual factors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022298022.


Assuntos
Call Centers , Comunicação , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Telefone , Triagem , Triagem/métodos , Humanos
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 479, 2023 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37170224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Norwegian municipalities had diverse strategies for handling tasks related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergency primary health care services were involved to different extents. The aim of this study was to describe how contacts with the emergency primary health care service were affected by the pandemic, in terms of patient contacts related to COVID-19, prioritisation and first actions taken, and to analyse differences between the services. METHODS: In this observational study, patient contacts to seven emergency primary health care services, from January 2020 to June 2021, were analysed. Descriptive analyses were applied. Data on the seven services' involvement in the municipal pandemic response, in relation to testing the inhabitants for COVID-19, were collected. RESULTS: There were 145 685 registered patient contacts within the study period. In total, 24% (n = 35,563) of the contacts were related to COVID-19, varying from 16 to 40% between the seven services. Of the COVID-19 related contacts, 96% (n = 34,069) were triaged to the lowest urgency level (range 76-99%) and 66% (n = 23,519) were patients contacting the services in order to be tested for COVID-19 (range 5-88%). The number of COVID-19 related contacts were unrelated to the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases among the inhabitants of the respective municipalities. The burden of COVID-19-related contacts mainly reflected the services' involvement in COVID-19 testing as part of the municipal pandemic response. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several of the emergency primary health care services were assigned new tasks, such as being part of the municipalities' system for carrying out testing for COVID-19. This had a major impact on their activity level. In the preparation for future pandemics, it should be discussed to which extent such use of the emergency primary health care system is appropriate, as additional tasks might affect the services' preparedness to provide urgent medical care among the inhabitants.


Assuntos
Plantão Médico , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Atenção Primária à Saúde
3.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e054046, 2022 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35501086

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe how an intervention to limit direct attendance in an emergency primary healthcare service affected the contacts to the clinic and the level of care given, and which factors were associated with a change from direct attendance to telephone contact. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Seven Norwegian emergency primary healthcare services. The telephone triage operators are primarily registered nurses. PARTICIPANTS: Registered patient contacts to the services during 2007-2019. INTERVENTIONS: In 2013, one of the seven services made an intervention to limit direct attendances to the emergency primary healthcare clinic. Through an advertisement in a local newspaper, the public was encouraged to call in advance. Patients who still attended directly, were encouraged to call in advance next time. MEASURES: We compared the proportions of direct attendance and telephone contact, and of consultation by a general practitioner and telephone consultation by an operator, before and after the intervention. We also compared the proportions of direct attendance regarding gender, age group, time of day and urgency level. Descriptive analyses and log binomial regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: There were 1 105 019 contacts to the seven services during the study period. The average proportion of direct attendance decreased from 68.7% (95% CI 68.4% to 68.9%) to 23.4% (95% CI 23.2% to 23.6%) in the service that carried out the intervention. Telephone consultation by an operator increased from 11.7% (95% CI 11.5% to 11.8%) to 29.2% (95% CI 28.9% to 29.5%) and medical consultation by a general practitioner decreased from 78.3% (95% CI 78.1% to 78.5%) to 57.0% (95% CI 56.7% to 57.3%). The youngest and the oldest age group and women had the largest decrease in direct attendance, by -81%, -74% and -71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The intervention influenced how the public contacted the service. Information campaigns on how to contact healthcare services should be implemented on a regular basis.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Triagem , Feminino , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Telefone
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 963, 2020 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33081757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As an alternative to acute hospitalisations, all communities in Norway are required to provide inpatient care in municipal acute bed units (MAUs) for patients who can be treated at the primary care level. Patient selection is challenging, and some patients need transfer from MAUs to hospitals. The aim of this study was to examine associations between characteristics of the patient at admission to MAU and further transfer to hospital. METHODS: In a prospective observational study on all admissions to a large MAU, March 2016-August 2017, information was obtained on patient age, gender, comorbidities, drug use, reason for stay and Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS) on admission and at discharge, and length of stay. Comparison between admissions resulting in discharge to hospital, nursing home or own home were performed with chi-square and ANOVA tests. Estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence interval for transfer to hospital versus being retained at primary care level was estimated for age, gender, comorbidity and TEWS in generalized linear models, crude and adjusted. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred forty-four admissions were included. Mean age of the patients was 69.5 years (SD 21.9), 65.2% were women. In 646 admissions (23.6%), the patients were transferred to hospital. Male gender and TEWS > 2 were associated with transfer to hospital. Most transfers to hospital occurred within 24 h, and these patients had unchanged or increasing TEWS during their stay at MAU. When transferred to hospital 41.5% of the patients had the same reason for stay as on MAU admission, 14.9% had another reason for stay, 25.2% had a medical condition outside the treatment scope of MAU, and 18.4% needed further diagnostic clarification in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Likelihood of transfer to hospital increased with male gender and higher TEWS on admission. Main reasons for transfer to hospital were lack of improvement and identification of clinical conditions that needed hospital care. TEWS > 2 at admission should make physicians alert to the need of close monitoring for lack of improvement.


Assuntos
Hospitais Municipais/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Escore de Alerta Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Triagem , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 33, 2020 Jan 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31931790

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence in emergency primary health care is prevalent, but longitudinal studies using validated assessment scales to describe the characteristics of workplace violence in these settings are lacking. The aim of the present study was to determine the characteristics of aggressive incidents in emergency primary health care clinics in Norway. METHODS: Incidents of workplace violence were reported with the Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE). The study was conducted in ten emergency primary health care clinics over a period of one year. RESULTS: A total of 320 aggressive incidents were registered. The mean overall SOAS-RE score for reported aggressive incidents was 9.7 on a scale from 0 to 22, and 60% of the incidents were considered severe. Incidents of verbal aggression accounted for 31.6% of all reported incidents, threats accounted for 24.7%, and physical aggression accounted for 43.7%. Verbal aggression was most often provoked by long waiting time. Physical aggression was most often provoked when the patient had to go through an involuntary assessment of health condition. Almost one third of the aggressors were females, and nurses were the most frequent targets of all aggression types. No differences in psychological stress were found between types of aggression. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that workplace violence in emergency primary health care clinics is a severe problem. Patterns in provocation and consequences of aggressive incidents can be used to improve our understanding of and prevention and follow-up procedures of such incidents.


Assuntos
Agressão , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Violência no Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Noruega , Observação , Prevalência , Gestão de Riscos , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 138(16)2018 10 16.
Artigo em Inglês, Norueguês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30344321

RESUMO

BAKGRUNN: #MeToo-kampanjen satte søkelys på forekomst av uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet innenfor ulike yrkesgrupper. Vi ønsket å undersøke uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet rettet mot leger, og så på omfang og endring over tid i to representative datasett innsamlet før kampanjen. MATERIALE OG METODE: I 1993 og 2014/15 ble det gjennomført spørreundersøkelser om arbeidsforhold, inkludert opplevd uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet, i representative utvalg av norske leger. Disse dataene ble analysert ved sammenligning av andeler og logistisk regresjon med hensyn til kjønn og alder. RESULTATER: Andelen leger som rapporterte opplevd uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet, økte signifikant fra 2,7 % (95 % KI 2,1-3,3) i 1993 til 4,6 % (3,4-5,8) i 2014/15. Det å være kvinne og å være ung ga økt risiko for opplevd uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet. FORTOLKNING: Vi finner en økning i opplevd uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet blant leger fra 1993 til 2015. Det kan reflektere en reell økning eller endret terskel for rapportering. I fremtidige studier bør man undersøke hvem den uønskede oppmerksomheten kommer fra, samt alvorlighetsgrad og konsekvenser av hendelsene.


Assuntos
Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assédio Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Local de Trabalho
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 335, 2018 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29739398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many emergency primary health care workers experience aggressive behaviour from patients or visitors. Simple incident-reporting procedures exist for inpatient, psychiatric care, but a similar and simple incident-report for other health care settings is lacking. The aim was to adjust a pre-existing form for reporting aggressive incidents in a psychiatric inpatient setting to the emergency primary health care settings. We also wanted to assess the validity of the severity scores in emergency primary health care. METHODS: The Staff Observation Scale - Revised (SOAS-R) was adjusted to create a pilot version of the Staff Observation Scale - Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE). A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was added to the form to judge the severity of the incident. Data for validation of the pilot version of SOAS-RE were collected from ten casualty clinics in Norway during 12 months. Variance analysis was used to test gender and age differences. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relative impact that each of the five SOAS-RE columns had on the VAS score. The association between SOAS-RE severity score and VAS severity score was calculated by the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The SOAS-R was adjusted to emergency primary health care, refined and called The Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE). A total of 350 SOAS-RE forms were collected from the casualty clinics, but due to missing data, 291 forms were included in the analysis. SOAS-RE scores ranged from 1 to 22. The mean total severity score of SOAS-RE was 10.0 (standard deviation (SD) =4.1) and the mean VAS score was 45.4 (SD = 26.7). We found a significant correlation of 0.45 between the SOAS-RE total severity scores and the VAS severity ratings. The linear regression analysis showed that individually each of the categories, which described the incident, had a low impact on the VAS score. CONCLUSIONS: The SOAS-RE seems to be a useful instrument for research, incident-recording and management of incidents in emergency primary care. The moderate correlation between SOAS-RE severity score and the VAS severity score shows that application of both the severity ratings is valuable to follow-up of workers affected by workplace violence.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Pessoal de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Violência no Trabalho/classificação , Agressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Noruega , Gestão de Riscos , Violência no Trabalho/psicologia
8.
BMJ Open ; 7(8): e017757, 2017 Aug 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28801441

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether reported prevalence of experienced threats, real acts of violence and debilitating fear of violence among Norwegian doctors have increased over the last two decades. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional survey. SETTING: All healthcare levels and medical specialties in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Representative samples of Norwegian doctors in 1993 (n=2628) and 2014 (n=1158). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of self-reported prevalence of work-time experiences of threats and real acts of violence, and of being physically or psychologically unfit during the last 12 months due to fear of violence, in 2014 compared with 1993, adjusted by age, gender and medical specialty. RESULTS: There were no differences in self-reported threats (adjusted RR=1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.08) or real acts (adjusted RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03) of violence when comparing 2014 with 1993. The proportion of doctors who had felt unfit due to fear of violence decreased from 1993 to 2014 (adjusted RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.73). Although still above average, the proportion of doctors in psychiatry who reported real acts of violence decreased substantially from 1993 to 2014 (adjusted RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of doctors experience threats and real acts of violence during their work-time career, but there was no evidence that workplace violence has increased over the last two decades. Still, the issue needs to be addressed as part of the doctors' education and within work settings.


Assuntos
Agressão , Médicos , Violência no Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Local de Trabalho , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Medo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Psiquiatria , Fatores de Risco , Especialização , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...