Patients' experiences with physical holding and mechanical restraint in the psychiatric care: an interview study.

BACKGROUND: In the continuous work to reduce the use of coercion in psychiatric care, attention in Denmark has especially been directed towards mechanical restraint. While the use of mechanical restraint is currently decreasing, an increase in other types of coercion is observed (e.g. medication and hour-long episodes of physical holding). Physical holding has, in this cultural context, been considered less intrusive to a patient's autonomy than the use of mechanical restraint. However, no study has yet compared the experiences of the patients on these two types of coercion in the same population. The objective of this study was to explore patients' perspectives on physical holding and mechanical restraint, respectively. METHODS: Audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews following an interview guide were conducted with patients sharing their experiences with both types of coercion. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. The analytical approach was based on the principles of thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Nine informants were interviewed between September 2020 and April 2021. Four main themes were identified: experiences with physical holding, experiences with mechanical restraint, the effects of coercion on patients and their relation to mental health care, and improved mental health care. CONCLUSION: It is inconclusive which type of restraint the patients preferred. This challenges the present hierarchy of coercive measures. To avoid coercion in the first place more communication and time with the patient are needed.

Time trends in co-occurring substance use and psychiatric illness (dual diagnosis) from 2000 to 2017 - a nationwide study of Danish register data.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to describe the time trend in number of dual diagnosis patients treated in the psychiatric system in Denmark from 2000 to 2017. METHOD: We calculated the share of patients with dual diagnosis, number of dual diagnosis contacts, number of unique individuals with dual diagnosis as well as number of new patients with dual diagnosis among patients in psychiatric treatment, i.e. among inpatients, outpatients and patients in emergency departments. In order to calculate this, we merged data from the National Patient Register (NPR), the National Registry of Alcohol Treatment, the National treatment registry for substance use, the National Prescription Registry and the Danish National Health Service register in the period from 2000 to 2017. RESULTS: We found an overall increase in patients with dual diagnosis in psychiatric treatment in Denmark from 2000 to 2017. We further detected an increase in the age and sex-standardized number of patients with dual diagnosis in treatment over time, however most markedly for outpatients. Further, inclusion of data from other sources of data than the NPR dramatically increased the number of patients that could be identified as dual diagnosis patients. Using these data, almost half of all male inpatients could be identified as dual diagnosis while the share was more than 40% for patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders (F2) and patients with personality disorders (F6). CONCLUSIONS: The increase of individual diagnosis patients necessitates action at different levels. This includes improvement of preventive measures as well as improvement of treatment for this underserved group.

REDD-PAC Cohort Description: Researching Dual Diagnosis - Prognosis and Characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence from real-world integrated dual diagnosis treatment programs is limited. In 2017 we decided to establish the REDD-PAC cohort with the aim to provide more in-depth information regarding the effect of integrated treatment. METHODS: The REDD-PAC cohort includes more than 2,500 patients with dual diagnosis that have been treated at an in-patient department specializing in the integrated treatment of both psychiatric illness and substance use disorder in Denmark in the period from 2002 to 2017. The collected data included information on diagnosis as well as patient-completed questionnaires regarding anxiety, depression, self-worth, and use of substances. Data regarding medications prescribed and administered, weight, height, and blood pressure were also included. RESULTS: The primary diagnosis was psychosis spectrum disorder (37.0%), followed by affective disorders (18.8%). More than two-thirds of the patients were male, and most patients had a weak connection to the labor market and basic schooling. Patients were generally very motivated for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Further linking the data to Danish national register data makes it possible to follow individual trajectories pre- and post-admission as well as to access complete follow-up data regarding long-term outcomes, e.g., use of health services, mortality, morbidity, crime, and social circumstances. This article describes both the overarching aims of the REDD-PAC cohort and the basic diagnostic and sociodemographic characteristics of the cohort.