Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 117: 98-103, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783070

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) in treating cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted, searching relevant databases for studies investigating MIS and/or OS in treating CES. Pooled outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were meta-analyzed via random-effects models. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled mean operation times were shorter for MIS (75.4 min; 95 %CI: 40.8, 110.0) than OS (155.1 min; 121.3, 188.9). Similarly, mean hospital stay was shorter for MIS (4.08 days; 2.77, 5.39 vs. 8.85 days; 6.56, 11.13). Mean blood loss was smaller for MIS (71.7 mL; 0, 154.5 vs. 366.5; 119.1, 614.0). Mean post-op lumbar/back visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower for MIS (3.65; 2.75, 4.56 vs. 5.80; 4.55, 7.05). Mean post-op leg VAS score was 1.27 (0.41, 21.4) for MIS and 1.29 (0.47, 2.12) for OS. Mean complete bladder recovery rate was 81.0% (55.0%, 94.0%) for MIS and 75.0% (44.0%, 92.0%) for OS. Mean complete motor recovery rate was larger for MIS (70.0%; 48.0, 85.0 vs. 42.0%; 34.0, 51.0). Mean percentages of "excellent" patient outcomes were equal for MIS (64.0%; 48.0%, 77.0%) and OS (64.0%; 22.0%, 92.0%). CONCLUSION: MIS for CES was associated with reduced operative time, length of stay, and blood loss, compared to OS. MIS was also associated with better post-operative lumbar/back and leg VAS scores and complete motor and bladder recovery rates. MIS and OS produced an equal average percentage of "excellent" patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Cauda Equina , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Síndrome da Cauda Equina/etiologia , Síndrome da Cauda Equina/cirurgia , Região Lombossacral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 97(5): 931-938, 2017 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28333015

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with early-stage, localized hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent definitive orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The subjects of this retrospective report are 38 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent SBRT per institutional phase 1 to 2 eligibility criteria, before definitive OLT. Pre-OLT radiographs were compared with pathologic gold standard. Analysis of treatment failures and deaths was undertaken. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 4.8 years from OLT, 9 of 38 patients (24%) recurred, whereas 10 of 38 patients (26%) died. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival are 77% and 74%, respectively. Sum longest dimension of tumors was significantly associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.93, P=.026). Pathologic response rate (complete plus partial response) was 68%. Radiographic scoring criteria performed poorly; modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors produced highest concordance (κ = 0.224). Explants revealed viable tumor in 74% of evaluable patients. Treatment failures had statistically larger sum longest dimension of tumors (4.0 cm vs 2.8 cm, P=.014) and non-statistically significant higher rates of lymphovascular space invasion (44% vs 17%), cT2 disease (44% vs 21%), ≥pT2 disease (67% vs 34%), multifocal tumors at time of SBRT (44% vs 21%), and less robust mean α-fetoprotein response (-25 IU/mL vs -162 IU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy before to OLT is a well-tolerated treatment providing 68% pathologic response, though 74% of explants ultimately contained viable tumor. Radiographic response criteria poorly approximate pathology. Our data suggest further stratification of patients according to initial disease burden and treatment response.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Card Electrophysiol Clin ; 8(2): 437-52, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27261833

RESUMO

Sotalol is effective for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contractions, and supraventricular tachycardia. Racemic (DL) sotalol inhibits the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current. There is a near linear relationship between sotalol dosage and QT interval prolongation. However, in dose ranging trials in patients with AF, low-dose sotalol was not more effective than placebo. Orally administered sotalol has a bioavailability of nearly 100%. The only significant drug interactions are the need to avoid or limit use of concomitant drugs that cause QT prolongation, bradycardia, and/or hypotension.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos , Sotalol , Potenciais de Ação/efeitos dos fármacos , Arritmias Cardíacas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...