Emergency treatment of popliteal aneurysms: Single center experience and systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular versus open repair.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) were traditionally treated by open repair (OR). Endovascular repair (ER) has become a new treatment strategy. The aim of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the current outcomes of OR and ER in the emergency treatment of PAA. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was carried out. Outcomes were 30-day mortality, morbidity, major amputation rate (30 days), major amputation rate (1 year), 1-year primary patency rate, 1-year secondary patency rate and 1-year survival. Additionally, we included clinical data of patients with popliteal aneurysms treated between 2009 and 2021 at the Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. RESULTS: We identified two cohort studies from 2014 and 2015 with a total of 199 patients that underwent emergent surgery (39 ER and 160 OR). We also included 26 patients from our institution. For emergency treatment, 30-day major amputation rates (18% vs 3%, Odds Ratio 5.82, 95% CI [1.75; 19.30], p = .004), 30-day mortality rates (10% vs 1%, Odds Ratio 5.57, 95% CI [1.01; 30.58], p = .05), 1-year major amputation rates (15% vs 6% Odds Ratio 3.61, 95% CI [1.18; 11.09], p = .02), 1-year loss of primary patency (54% vs 23%, Odds Ratio 3.19, 95% CI [0.91; 11.20], p = .07), and 1-year loss of secondary patency (44% vs 12%, Odds Ratio 6.91, 95% CI [3.01; 15.83], p < .05) were higher in the ER group when compared to the OR group. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair represents an alternative approach for the emergency treatment of PAA. Limited evidence from the available non-randomized studies shows unfavorable outcomes for patients undergoing ER. However, the results are prone to selection bias, and only randomized trials comparing ER to OR might reveal whether a subgroup of patients would benefit from ER as primary treatment of PAA in an emergency setting.

Single-Center Retrospective Subgroup Analysis of "Primary Aortic" (Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection, PAU) and "Secondary Aortic" (Iatrogenic, Trauma, Aortoesophageal Fistula) Indications for Emergency TEVAR.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the treatment of "primary aortic" (aneurysm, aortic dissection, penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU)) and "secondary aortic" (iatrogenic, trauma, and aortoesophageal fistula) pathologies. METHODS: Retrospective review of a cohort of patients treated at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. The primary end point was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were the duration of the procedure, duration of postoperative intensive care treatment, length of hospital stay, and the nature and severity of postoperative complications according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent TEVAR for emergency indications. Twenty-two patients were treated for primary and twelve patients for secondary aortic pathologies. Concerning in-hospital mortality, no statistically significant difference could be observed between the primary and secondary aortic groups (27.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.711). Patients with an aortoesophageal fistula had a mortality rate of 66.7%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo-Clavien > 3) was also not statistically significantly different between the primary and secondary aortic groups (36.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.86). Preoperative hemoglobin level (p < 0.001 for mortality, p = 0.002 for morbidity), hemoglobin level difference (p = 0.022, p = 0.032), postoperative creatinine level (p = 0.009, p = 0.035), and pre- and postoperative lactate levels (p < 0.001 for both mortality and morbidity) were found to be independent factors associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity (Dindo-Clavien > 3), respectively. The preoperative creatinine level was found to be associated with mortality (p = 0.024) but not morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and in-hospital mortality are still considerable after emergency TEVAR for both primary and secondary aortic indications. Pre- and postoperative levels of hemoglobin, creatinine, and lactate may be valuable to predict patient outcomes.

Endovascular and open repair of visceral aneurysms: A retrospective single­center analysis.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the outcome of open surgical and endovascular interventions for the treatment of visceral aneurysms. A retrospective review of a cohort of visceral aneurysm patients treated at a single tertiary referral center was conducted. STROBE guidelines were followed. The primary endpoint was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were major morbidity (Dindo-Clavien score, >3), the duration of the procedure, technical success and the length of hospital stay. As a result, 12 patients underwent open or endovascular surgery. No 30-day mortality or major morbidity were observed. The median aneurysm diameter was 2.0 cm (range, 1.5-5.0 cm). The median postoperative stay was four days for all procedures and significantly longer after open surgery compared with endovascular repair (ER) (7 vs. 3 days). Overall, the evidence from the present retrospective analysis shows no mortality and a shorter length of stay for patients undergoing ER for the treatment of a visceral aneurysm (VAA). Although the results are in line with the fact that ER is considered to be the first line treatment for VAA, this may be prone to selection bias.

Visceral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Endovascular Versus Open Repair.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID 348699.

Postoperative Sigmoidoscopy and Biopsy After Elective Endovascular and Open Aortic Surgery for Preventing Mortality by Colonic Ischemia (PSB-Aorta-CI): Protocol for a Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair is considered the standard procedure in treating patients diagnosed with pathologies of the abdominal aorta with suitable anatomy. Open surgery remains an option mostly for patients not suitable for endovascular surgery. Colonic ischemia is an important and life-threatening postoperative complication of these procedures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical value and safety of performing a planned sigmoidoscopy and biopsy for detection of colonic ischemia in patients undergoing elective aortic surgery. We also aim to develop prediction scores which could identify patients at risk for colonic ischemia and facilitate their timely treatment. METHODS: The trial is designed as a prospective study. The decision for aortic surgery and eligibility for these procedures will be ascertained according to current guidelines. Afterward, screening of the patient for the remaining inclusion and exclusion criteria will occur. If eligibility for study inclusion is confirmed, the patient will be informed about the aims of the study and all study-specific procedures (sigmoidoscopy and biopsy) and asked to provide informed consent. RESULTS: The primary end point is the proportion of patients diagnosed endoscopically with subclinical and clinically relevant colonic ischemia among all patients undergoing aortic surgery. Patient recruitment started on June 2021. The final patient is expected to be treated by the end of June 2023. Institutional Review Board review has been completed at the University of Halle (Saale; reference #052-2021). CONCLUSIONS: this shows that sigmoidoscopy can be performed safely and is effective for the timely diagnosis of colonic ischemia in these patients, this could result in its routine implementation in both elective and emergency settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025587; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId =trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00025587. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/39071.

Acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: single center analysis of open, endovascular, and hybrid surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyse the outcome of open surgical, endovascular, and hybrid interventions in the treatment of acute (AMI) and chronic (CMI) mesenteric ischemia. METHODS: Retrospective review of a cohort of mesenteric ischemia patients at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. Primary end point was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were the number of bowel resections, duration of the procedure, length of postoperative intensive care treatment, length of hospital stay, revision surgery (number and type), and the nature and severity of postoperative complications according to Dindo-Clavien. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients, 20 with CMI and 44 with AMI, underwent open, hybrid or endovascular surgery. Bowel resection was performed in 45.5% of the patients with AMI (29.5% small intestine, 2.3% colon and 13.6% both). There was no in-hospital mortality in the CMI cohort as compared to 29.5% in the AMI cohort (p = 0.03), with no differences regarding endovascular and open surgery (29.6 vs 29.4%). Severe postoperative morbidity (Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3) was also significantly more frequent in the AMI group when compared to the CMI group (20 vs 77.3%, p < 0.001). ASA classification and intensive care stay were identified as factors associated with mortality in AMI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and in-hospital mortality are low in CMI patients, but substantial in AMI patients. Early diagnosis and open or endovascular treatment may be decisive for the outcome of these patients.

Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma in the Area of the Neurovascular Bundle of the Upper Arm Mimicking a Schwannoma of the Ulnar Nerve.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EH) is a rare vascular malignant sarcoma. To date, there are only two published case reports of EH mimicking nerve sheath tumors of a peripheral nerve. A 41-year-old woman presented with a painful node on the inside of the upper arm and motor deficits of the ulnar nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up and neurosonography revealed a slowly progressive, contrast-enhancing tumor in the area of the neurovascular bundle. A schwannoma of the ulnar nerve was suspected. At surgery, the tumor was adherent to the brachial artery, but not to nerves. Pathology revealed an EH. EH may mimic a nerve sheath tumor and should be taken into consideration, especially because of its potential for metastasis and fatal progression.

[Pitfalls of Differential Diagnosis in Dermatologic Surgery]. / Differenzialdiagnostische Fallstricke aus der Dermatochirurgie.

Evaluation of skin diseases can be challenging for non-dermatologists. Even obvious well-characterized skin pathologies might be misleading and thus treatment can fail. Particularly the differentiation of surgical treated entities is important, for example the management of a wound healing disturbance profoundly differs from that of a pyoderma gangrenosum. This article outlines several easily mistaken pairs of dermatologic entities on one hand and surgical on the other. For example, a livedo vasculopathy can be confused with a leg ulcer, a nail melanoma with a simple hematoma and finally a hidradenitis suppurativa with an axillary abscess. Typical clinical signs and anamnestic data may often lead to the right diagnosis also assisted by the simple fact to "keep it in mind".

Clostridium difficile infection: guideline-based diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is the pathogen that most commonly causes nosocomial and antibiotic-associated diarrheal disease. Optimized algorithms for diagnosis, treatment, and hygiene can help lower the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of C. difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: This review is based on pertinent articles that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed for recommendations on diagnosis and treatment(up to March 2014), with particular attention to the current epidemiological situation in Germany. RESULTS: The incidence of CDI in Germany is 5 to 20 cases per 100,000 persons per year. In recent years, a steady increase in severe, reportable cases of CDI has been observed, and the highly virulent epidemic strain Ribotype 027 has spread across nearly the entire country. For therapeutic and hygiene management, it is important that the diagnosis be made as early as possible with a sensitive screening test, followed by a confirmatory test for the toxigenic infection. Special disinfection measures are needed because of the formation of spores. The treatment of CDI is evidence-based; depending on the severity of the infection, it is treated orally with metronidazole, or else with vancomycin or fidaxomicin. Fulminant infections and recurrences call for specifically adapted treatment modalities. Treatment with fecal bacteria (stool transplantation) is performed in gastroenterological centers that have experience with this form of treatment after multiple failures of drug treatment for recurrent infection. For critically ill patients, treatment is administered by an interdisciplinary team and consists of early surgical intervention in combination with drug treatment. A therapeutic algorithm developed on the basis of current guidelines and recommendations enables risk-adapted, individualized treatment. CONCLUSION: The growing clinical and epidemiological significance of CDI compels a robust implementation of multimodal diagnostic, therapeutic, and hygienic standards. In the years to come, anti-toxin antibodies, toxoid vaccines, and focused bacterial therapy will be developed as new treatment strategies for CDI.

Radio-opacity and incidental identified mechanical complications of totally implantable venous access devices placed in the chest.

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) may be associated with different complications. Certain mechanical port disorders can easily be diagnosed on chest radiographs if the implanted systems are radiopaque and well visible. There are no reports regarding the visibility of TIVAD on chest X-rays. PURPOSE: To assess the radio opacity of TIVAD implanted in the chest as well as type and frequency of mechanical complications of ports on chest X-ray images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Chest X-rays of 985 patients from the time period 2007-2009 were analyzed retrospectively. In these patients 1190 TIVAD were inserted. All parts of the TIVAD, i.e. port chamber, connection, and port catheter, were checked for their visibility on chest radiographs. An opacity score was used here as follows: ++ well visible; + visible; - partly or completely invisible. Mechanical complications of TIVAD incidentally detected on chest X-ray were also analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Nineteen TIVAD models with diverse configuration and visibility of port chambers, connections, and catheters were identified in our study. Eighty-eight percent of the analyzed port systems were well visible or visible on chest radiographs. Twelve percent of the port chambers and catheters were partly visible or completely invisible. In 9% of the TIVAD, different mechanical complications were diagnosed on chest X-ray images. CONCLUSION: TIVADs should be evaluated carefully on every chest X-ray. Ideally, they should be radio-opaque and well visible on thoracic X-ray images. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Therefore, manufacturers of TIVAD should take into consideration to use exclusively radio-opaque materials that allow sufficient visibility of each port component on chest radiographs.

Intravenous port catheter embolization: mechanisms, clinical features, and management.

Venous catheters are important therapeutic devices for the administration of fluid and chemotherapeutic agents; however, their use may be associated with serious complications, such as catheter rupture and embolism. Most data on port catheter embolization consist of isolated case reports; only a few studies have examined a large number of patients with port catheter embolism. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of clinical symptoms in patients with catheter dislocation and to determine the role of catheter fragment localization in combination with the presenting symptoms. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to Martin-Luther University Hospital Center from January 1994 to September 2005. In total, 41 patients with centrally dislocated catheter fragments were analyzed. Most catheter fragments were located in the pulmonary artery, superior vena cava, and right atrium. Of the patients in whom the catheter fragments were located in the right atrium, right ventricle, and the pulmonary artery, 7.3% presented cardiac symptoms. Catheter malfunction occurred in 39%. In 53.7%, catheter embolism was found incidentally. The embolized catheter fragments were retrieved by a goose-neck snare under fluoroscopy within 24 hours after the diagnosis without any complications. The mean length of these fragments was 11.6 cm. Catheter embolism may go undiagnosed for a prolonged period and be found incidentally. In these patients, predominantly local symptoms occur; however, severe systemic clinical signs may develop. The risk of serious complications in asymptomatic catheter embolism is unknown. Catheter fragments should be removed to prevent further complications.

Frequency of transient ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Especially because of improvements in clinical neurologic monitoring, carotid endarterectomy done under local anesthesia has become the technique of choice in several centers. Temporary ipsilateral vocal nerve palsies due to local anesthetics have been described, however. Such complications are most important in situations where there is a pre-existing contralateral paralysis. We therefore examined the effect of local anesthesia on vocal cord function to better understand its possible consequences. METHODS: This prospective study included 28 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. Vocal cord function was evaluated before, during, and after surgery (postoperative day 1) using flexible laryngoscopy. Anesthesia was performed by injecting 20 to 40 mL of a mixture of long-acting (ropivacaine) and short-acting (prilocaine) anesthetic. RESULTS: All patients had normal vocal cord function preoperatively. Twelve patients (43%) were found to have intraoperative ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis. It resolved in all cases < or =24 hours. There were no significant differences in operating time or volume or frequency of anesthetic administration in patients with temporary vocal cord paralysis compared with those without. CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia led to temporary ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis in almost half of these patients. Because pre-existing paralysis is of a relevant frequency (up to 3%), a preoperative evaluation of vocal cord function before carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia is recommended to avoid intraoperative bilateral paralysis. In patients with preoperative contralateral vocal cord paralysis, surgery under general anesthesia should be considered.