Impact of pain and nonpain co-morbidities on opioid use in women with endometriosis.

Aim: To evaluate impact of co-morbidities on opioid use in endometriosis. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the Symphony Health database (July 2015-June 2018), which contains medical and pharmacy claims information on 79,947 women with endometriosis. Relative risk (RR) of postdiagnosis opioid use and supply duration associated with baseline co-morbidities were determined. Results: Women with endometriosis using opioids at baseline were 61% more likely to receive opioids postdiagnosis (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.59-1.63). Risk of prolonged opioid supply postdiagnosis was highest for those with prolonged supply at baseline (RR: 21.14; 20.14-22.19), and was 1.32 (1.26-1.38) for patients with ≥1 co-morbidity, 1.37 (1.31-1.43) for pain co-morbidities and 1.07 (1.04-1.11) for psychiatric co-morbidities. Conclusion: Risk of opioid use after endometriosis diagnosis was greater in patients who used opioids before diagnosis. Risk of prolonged opioid use was greater if co-morbidities existed before diagnosis.

Real-World Characterization of Women with Diagnosed Endometriosis Initiating Therapy with Elagolix Using a US Claims Database.

PURPOSE: Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist approved in the United States for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. We performed a real-world evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis who were initiating elagolix therapy in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort database analysis included women 18-49 years of age with ≥1 pharmacy claim for elagolix between August 2018 and December 2019 from the Copyright © 2020 Truven Health Analytics LLC. All Rights Reserved. Women had continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment during the baseline period (year immediately preceding the index date [date of earliest elagolix claim]) and had ≥1 medical claim with endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 code [617.x and N80.x]) on or before the index date. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, ICD code-based endometriosis anatomic site, endometriosis-related treatments, and pain symptoms were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: The study included 2083 patients with mean age at baseline of 33.2 ± 8.1 years. Comorbidities most commonly recorded were non-cancer, non-endometriosis pain (59.5%), including arthritis/joint pain (43.7%) and back/neck pain (31.7%), and mental disorder (40.7%), including anxiety (32.7%). The majority of endometriosis diagnosis codes recorded referred to unspecified location (52.3%) and pelvic peritoneum (23.0%); 61.0% of patients received a medical endometriosis-related treatment in the baseline period, with the most common treatments being contraceptives (various routes of administration, 40.2%) and progestins (31.7%). Additionally, 35.4% of the patients received an endometriosis-related surgery during baseline, with the most common being laparoscopy (33.2% of all patients). Opioids were used during the baseline period by 57.3% of the patients. For pain symptoms, 71.5%, 30.4%, and 19.3% of the patients had claims for pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis therapies were used by a significant proportion of patients with endometriosis in the year immediately preceding elagolix initiation.

Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements in Patients With Endometriosis Treated With Elagolix.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of elagolix on clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by the EHP-30 (Endometriosis Health Profile-30). METHODS: Data from two phase III trials of elagolix for moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis were pooled and analyzed as three groups: placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily. Patients were administered the EHP-30 questionnaire at baseline, and at months 1, 3, and 6 of treatment. Previously established responder definitions were applied to determine percentages of patients with clinically meaningful EHP-30 improvements. The probability of meeting EHP-30 responder definitions with elagolix compared with placebo at months 3 and 6 was determined by Poisson regression analysis, controlling for baseline scores. RESULTS: At month 6, the probabilities of meeting EHP-30 subscale responder definitions for pain, control and powerlessness, self-image, social support, emotional well-being, and sexual intercourse were 169% (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 2.69, 95% CI 2.26-3.21), 129% (aRR 2.29, 95% CI 1.96-2.67), 80% (aRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.54-2.11), 70% (aRR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.97), 67% (aRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.45-1.92), and 62% (aRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36-1.92) greater, respectively (all P<.001), in the 200-mg group than in the placebo group. Although lower in magnitude than the 200-mg group, the 150-mg group also had greater probabilities of meeting responder definitions than the placebo group for all subscales except sexual intercourse. The probabilities of meeting responder definitions for pain, control and powerlessness, self-image, social support, and emotional well-being were 75% (aRR 1.75, 95% CI 1.44-2.14), 50% (aRR 1.50, 95% CI 1.25-1.80), 22% (aRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.47), 30% (aRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.53), and 35% (aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.57) greater, respectively (all P<.05), in the 150-mg group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis and were treated with elagolix experienced clinically meaningful HRQOL improvements. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01620528 and NCT01931670. FUNDING SOURCE: AbbVie Inc.

The economic impact of switching from Synthroid for the treatment of hypothyroidism.

AIMS: To compare hypothyroidism-related costs for patients who continuously used Synthroid and patients who switched from Synthroid to alternative therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Truven's Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 was queried for US adults diagnosed with hypothyroidism who initiated Synthroid and adhered to such therapy for at least 6 months. Propensity score matching matched continuous users of Synthroid to patients who switched from Synthroid to alternative levothyroxine agents. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences between the matched cohorts in several categories of costs, including disease-related drug costs, non-drug medical costs, and total direct medical costs. RESULTS: There were 10,159 individuals included in the study, with 7,991 continuous users of Synthroid and 2,168 switchers. After matching (n = 2,052 for each cohort), continuous use of Synthroid was associated with significantly lower hypothyroidism-related non-drug medical costs ($595 vs $1,023; p = .003) and reduced hypothyroidism-related total medical costs ($757 vs $1,132; p = .010), despite being associated with significantly higher drug costs ($161 vs $109; p < .001). Hypothyroidism-related total medical costs rose as the number of switches of hypothyroidism treatment increased, with continuous users having significantly lower hypothyroidism-related total medical costs ($757) compared with patients who switched twice ($1,179; p = .001) or three or more times ($1,268; p = .004). LIMITATIONS: The analyses focused on continuously insured patients who were adherent to Synthroid for at least 6 months and results may not be generalizable. The reliance on claims data does not allow for clinical examination of hypothyroidism or inclusion of some factors that may be associated with outcomes. The analyses assume that all prescriptions filled are taken as prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that there are significant direct economic healthcare costs associated with switching from Synthroid to alternative levothyroxine therapies, and that these costs increase as patients switch therapies more frequently.

Cost effectiveness of paricalcitol versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients in the USA.

BACKGROUND: The IMPACT SHPT [Improved Management of Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) with Paricalcitol-Centered Therapy Versus Cinacalcet Therapy with Low-Dose Vitamin D in Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism] study compared the effectiveness of paricalcitol and cinacalcet in the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients but did not report the costs or cost effectiveness of these treatments. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of a paricalcitol-based regimen versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients from a US payer perspective, using a 1-year time horizon. METHODS: This was a post hoc cost-effectiveness analysis of data collected for US patients enrolled in the IMPACT SHPT study-a 28-week, randomized, open-label, phase 4, multinational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080). Patients eligible for the IMPACT SHPT study were aged≥18 years with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, had been receiving maintenance haemodialysis three times weekly for at least 3 months before screening and were to continue haemodialysis during the study. Only US patients who reached the evaluation period (weeks 21-28) were included in this secondary analysis. US subjects in the IMPACT SHPT study were randomly assigned to receive intravenous paricalcitol, or oral cinacalcet plus fixed-dose intravenous doxercalciferol, for 28 weeks. Patients in the paricalcitol group could also receive supplemental cinacalcet for hypercalcaemia. The primary effectiveness endpoint in the IMPACT SHPT study was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of 150-300 pg/mL during the evaluation period. In this secondary analysis, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), comparing paricalcitol-treated patients with cinacalcet-treated patients on the basis of this primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints. Costs were estimated by examining the dosage of the study drug (paricalcitol or cinacalcet) and phosphate binders used by each participant during the trial. Nonparametric bootstrap analysis was used to examine the accuracy of the ICER point estimates. RESULTS: The percentages of patients achieving the treatment goal of a mean iPTH level between 150-300 pg/mL during weeks 21-28 of therapy were 56.9% in the paricalcitol group and 34.0% in the cinacalcet group (a difference of 23%, p=0.0235). Paricalcitol was also more effective for each of the secondary endpoints. When annualized, the total drug costs were US$10,153 in the paricalcitol group and US$15,967 in the cinacalcet group, a difference of US$5,814 (57.3%, p=0.0053). Because the paricalcitol-based treatment was less expensive and more effective, it was 'dominant', compared with cinacalcet, in this cost-effectiveness analyses. In our bootstrap analysis, 99.1% of bootstrap replicates for the ICER of the primary endpoint fell within the lower right quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane-where paricalcitol is considered dominant. For all of the other endpoints, paricalcitol was dominant in 100% of replicates. CONCLUSION: On the basis of dosing and effectiveness data from US patients in the IMPACT SHPT study, we found that a regimen of intravenous paricalcitol was more cost effective than cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in the management of iPTH in patients with SHPT requiring haemodialysis.

The endodontic workforce.

The amount of endodontic care provided in the US requires an understanding of the supply and demand for such care. The supply side includes the number and location of endodontists, type of provider, and productivity. The demand side consists of the changing demographics of the age groups that endodontists predominantly treat along with changes in their dental health. To address these issues, we have compiled and analyzed data from American Dental Association (ADA) with other sources such as US government census data and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). From 1982 to 2002, the supply of endodontists increased at a rate greater than that observed with general practitioners or the other specialty areas. The growth of endodontists in relation to general practitioners is important. The latter are co-providers of endodontic care as well as a primary source for referral of patients to endodontists. Demographic and disease changes are likely to impact the need and demand for endodontic services. Endodontists' patients are generally between the ages of 25 and 64 yrs. Currently, the majority of endodontists' patients are members of the large baby boom generation who in 2000 ranged in age from their late 30s to their late 50s. During the next 20 yrs the Baby Boom generation will be replaced by the numerically smaller Generation-X cohort. This generation has experienced substantially less total caries than baby-boomers and they most likely will have fewer endodontic sequela as they age. A moderating factor that could partially offset the predicted decline in numbers of patients is the increased number of teeth that Generation-Xers are likely to retain. A flexible endodontic workforce strategy must assess the impending demographic and disease trends in relation to future growth rates of both endodontists and general practitioners.