Forces applied by anterior and posterior teeth and roles of periodontal afferents during hold-and-split tasks in human subjects.

Hold-and-split tasks were performed by 20 subjects (12 females and 8 males) using the right central incisors, canines, 2nd premolars, and 1st molars, respectively. Half a peanut was positioned on a transducer-equipped plate and the subject was instructed to hold the plate with the peanut between two antagonistic teeth, and not using more force than necessary. After ca. 3 s the subject was instructed to split the peanut in a natural manner. Each session consisted of a series of three in which the subject performed the hold-and-split task five times for each tooth. Thus, in total, data were obtained from 60 trials for each subject. The magnitude of the forces and the force rates used to split the peanut increased distally along the dental arch. However, the duration of the split phase was similar for the various teeth examined. During anesthesia of the periodontal ligament (four subjects), no significant changes were seen in the split phase. The forces used to hold the peanut between the teeth also increased distally along the dental arch: 0.60 N for the incisor, 0.77 N for the canine, 1.15 N for the 2nd premolar, and 1.74 N for the 1st molar. The difference in hold forces for the various teeth can be explained by the different sensitivity characteristics of the periodontal afferents innervating anterior and posterior teeth. During periodontal anesthesia, the magnitude and variability of the hold forces increased for all types of teeth, thus supporting the suggestion that periodontal afferent information is used in the regulation of the level of forces used to hold and manipulate morsels between the teeth.

A study on synaptic coupling between single orofacial mechanoreceptors and human masseter muscle.

The connection between individual orofacial mechanoreceptive afferents and the motoneurones that innervate jaw muscles is not well established. For example, although electrical and mechanical stimulation of orofacial afferents in bulk evokes responses in the jaw closers, whether similar responses can be evoked in the jaw muscles from the discharge of type identified single orofacial mechanoreceptive afferents is not known. Using tungsten microelectrodes, we have recorded from 28 afferents in the inferior alveolar nerve and 21 afferents in the lingual nerve of human volunteers. We have used discharges of single orofacial afferents as the triggers and the electromyogram (EMG) of the masseter as the source to generate spike-triggered averaged records to illustrate time-based EMG modulation by the nerve discharge. We have then used cross correlation analysis to quantify the coupling. Furthermore, we have also used coherence analysis to study frequency-based relationship between the nerve spike trains and the EMG. The discharge patterns of the skin and mucosa receptors around the lip and the gingiva generated significant modulation in EMGs with a success rate of 40% for both cross correlation and coherence analyses. The discharge patterns of the periodontal mechanoreceptors (PMRs) generated more coupling with a success rate of 70% for cross correlation and about 35% for coherence analyses. Finally, the discharges of the tongue receptors displayed significant coupling with the jaw muscle motoneurones with a success rate of about 40% for both analyses. Significant modulation of the jaw muscles by single orofacial receptors suggests that they play important roles in controlling the jaw muscle activity so that mastication and speech functions are executed successfully.

Encoding of amplitude and rate of tooth loads by human periodontal afferents from premolar and molar teeth.

Microneurographic recordings were obtained from 20 periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents in the inferior alveolar nerve while force profiles of different amplitudes and rates were applied to a premolar or the first molar in the most sensitive direction. The majority of afferents (17/20) showed a hyperbolic relationship between the steady-state discharge rate and the amplitude of the stimulating force, featuring a pronounced saturation tendency. These afferents were also characterized by a similar decline in dynamic sensitivity with increasing amplitude of background force. However, a few afferents (3/20) showed nearly linear stimulus-response relationships and a small decline in dynamic sensitivity with increasing tooth load. Quantitative models developed for all afferents successfully predicted the afferent discharge rates for novel force stimulations. Application of the transfer function to chewing forces predicted that the discharge rates of periodontal afferents rapidly increased at initial tooth contact and continued to discharge as long as the tooth was loaded. However, due to the marked saturation tendencies at higher forces, most periodontal afferents poorly encoded the magnitude of the strong chewing forces. In addition, the discharge rates of a minority of afferents continued to reflect the force profile during high chewing forces. The results revealed that periodontal afferents of posterior teeth were less sensitive at low tooth loads compared with afferents of anterior teeth. During each chewing cycle, periodontal afferents may provide information about the mechanical properties of food shortly after tooth contact that can be used to scale the muscle commands of the upcoming power phase.

Receptive field properties of human periodontal afferents responding to loading of premolar and molar teeth.

Impulses in 45 single mechanoreceptive afferents were recorded from the human inferior alveolar nerve with permucosally inserted tungsten microelectrodes. All afferents responded to mechanical stimulation of one or more premolar or molar teeth and most likely innervated their periodontal ligaments. For each afferent, isolated "ramp-and-hold" shaped force profiles of similar magnitudes (252 +/- 24 mN; mean +/- SD) were applied to the lower first premolar, the second premolar, and the first molar on the recording side. The tooth loads were applied in six directions: lingual, facial, mesial, and distal in the horizontal plane and up and down in the vertical direction of the tooth. The afferents response during the static phase of the stimulus was analyzed. All afferents were slowly adapting, discharging continuously in response to static forces in at least one stimulation direction. Twenty-nine afferents (64%) were spontaneously active, exhibiting an ongoing discharge in the absence of external stimulation. Stimulation of a single tooth was found to excite each afferent most strongly. The most sensitive tooth (MST) was the first premolar for 23, the second premolar for 13, and the first molar for 9 afferents. About half of the afferent population also responded to loading of one or two more teeth. The response profiles of these afferents indicated that the multiple-teeth receptive fields were due to mechanical coupling between the teeth rather than branching of single afferents to innervate several teeth. The afferent responses to loading the mesial and distal halves of the first molars were very similar. Thus both intensive and directional aspects of the afferent response when loading one side of the tooth was preserved to a great extent when loading the other side. When loading the MST, the afferents typically showed excitatory responses in two to four of the six stimulation directions, i.e., the afferents were broadly tuned to direction of tooth loading. In the horizontal plane, the afferent populations at the premolar teeth expressed no clear directional preferences. The afferents at the molar, however, showed a strong directional bias in the distal-lingual direction. In the vertical plane, there was a preference for downward-directed forces with a gradually decreasing sensitivity distally along the dental arch. The present results demonstrate that human periodontal afferents supplying anterior and posterior teeth differ in their capacity to signal horizontal and vertical forces, respectively.