Margins in Stage I and II Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review From the American Head and Neck Society.

Importance: The assessment and management of surgical margins in stage I and II oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most important perioperative aspects of oncologic care, with profound implications for patient outcomes and adjuvant therapy. Understanding and critically reviewing the existing data surrounding margins in this context is necessary to rigorously care for this challenging group of patients and minimize patient morbidity and mortality. Observations: This review discusses the data related to the definitions related to surgical margins, methods for assessment, specimen vs tumor bed margin evaluation, and re-resection of positive margins. The observations presented emphasize notable controversy within the field about margin assessment, with early data coalescing around several key aspects of management, although studies are limited by their design. Conclusions and Relevance: Stage I and II oral cavity cancer requires surgical resection with negative margins to obtain optimal oncologic outcomes, but controversy persists over margin assessment. Future studies with improved, well-controlled study designs are required to more definitively guide margin assessment and management.

Lund-mackay staging system in cystic fibrosis: a prognostic factor for revision surgery?

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease that affects approximately 30,000 people in the United States. Mucus in CF patients can be exceptionally viscous, leading to progressive cycles of inflammation and infection. The most widely accepted staging system used to score sinus computed tomography (CT) scans is the Lund-Mackay Score (LMS). METHODS: To determine if a significant correlation exists between LMS and the need for revision sinus surgery in a patient population with CF, we performed a retrospective review of 32 patients with CF who were referred to the Tulane Otolaryngology Clinic from 2005 to 2011 and received a CT scan of the paranasal sinuses. CT scans were graded in a blinded manner by the institution's neuroradiologist using the LMS system. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in the raw or scaled LMSs between patients receiving revision surgery (n=9) and patients receiving a single surgery (n=23). CONCLUSIONS: CT scans are vital for preoperative planning, but they are not a useful tool for risk stratification. More specifically, application of the LMS is not relevant in identifying which CF patients with chronic rhinosinusitis will be at risk for revision surgeries.