RESUMO
Objectives: Emergency Medicine (EM) provider experiences consulting telestroke (TS) are poorly studied. In this qualitative study, we aimed to determine how TS changes patient management and to measure TS effects on EM provider confidence with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment. Materials and methods: We designed a survey for EM providers querying perceptions of TS value, confidence with treating AIS, and counterfactuals regarding what EM providers would have done without TS. Eligible EM providers participated in an audio-visual TS consult within a 6-state TS network between 11/2016-11/2017. Results: We received 48 surveys (response rate 43%). The most common reason (71%) for using TS was tPA eligibility expert opinion. Most EM providers (94%) thought the patient/family were satisfied with TS and none felt their medical knowledge was doubted because of using TS. EM providers had high confidence in diagnosing AIS (95%) and tPA decision-making (86%), but not in determining thrombectomy eligibility (10%). Among EM providers who administered tPA, 85% said tPA would not have been given without TS consultation. TS consultation changed patient diagnosis in 60% of all patients and treatment plans in 56% of non-stroke patients. Most EM providers (86%) had increased confidence in their knowledge of future stroke patient management. Nearly all TS consults (93%) resulted in EM providers being more likely to use TS again. Conclusions: TS consult frequently results in both patient management change and increased EM knowledge of stroke management with increased likelihood of repeat usage. Discomfort in determining eligibility for thrombectomy points to educational opportunities.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Telestroke (TS) networks are standard in many areas of the US. Despite TS systems having approximately 33% mimic rates, it is unknown if TS can accurately diagnose patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) versus stroke mimics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive TS consults to 27 TS sites in six states during 2018. Clinical information and diagnosis were extracted from discharge records and compared to those from the TS consult. Discharge diagnoses were verified and coded into 12 categories. Cases without a clear discharge diagnosis and intracerebral haemorrhage were excluded. We report agreement and a Cohen's kappa between TS and discharge diagnoses for the category of AIS/transient ischemic attack (TIA) versus stroke mimic. RESULTS: We included 404 cases in the analysis (mean age 66 years; 54% women). Of these, 225 had a TS diagnosis of AIS/TIA; 102 (45%) received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Our study demonstrated a high diagnostic agreement for AIS/TIA (88%) with a kappa of 0.75 for stroke and mimics. Of the 179 patients diagnosed with a stroke mimic on TS, 27 (15%) were diagnosed with AIS/TA by discharge. TS mimic diagnosis had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90%; TS diagnosis of stroke/TIA had PPV 90%, NPV 85%. DISCUSSION: We found excellent correlation between TS and discharge diagnoses for patients with both stroke and stroke mimics. This suggests that TS systems can accurately assess a wider variety of patients with acute neurologic syndromes other than AIS.
