Medication assessment tool to detect care issues from routine data: a pilot study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Medication assessment tools (MATs) may be implemented in routine electronic data sources in order to identify patients with opportunities for optimisation of medication therapy management (MTM) and follow-up by a multi-disciplinary team. OBJECTIVE: (1) To demonstrate the use of a MAT for cardiovascular conditions (MAT CVC) as a means of profiling potential opportunities for MTM optimisation in primary care and (2) to assess the performance of MAT CVC in identifying actual opportunities for better care. SETTING: Members of a pharmacotherapy discussion group, i.e. two single-handed general practitioners (GPs), three GP partners, and community pharmacists (CPs) from each of two community pharmacies, in a rural part of the Netherlands. METHODS: MAT CVC comprises 21 medication assessment criteria, each of which is designed to detect a specific care issue and to check whether it is 'addressed' by provision of guideline recommended care or 'open' in the presence ('open explained') or absence ('open unexplained') of pre-specified explanations for guideline deviations. (1) Relevant data was extracted from linked GP and CP electronic records and MAT CVC assessment was conducted to profile the population of CVC patients registered with both, participating CPs and GPs, in terms of 'open unexplained' care issues. (2) A purposive sample of patients with 'open unexplained' care issues was reviewed by each patient's GP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number and proportion of 'open unexplained' care issues per MAT CVC criterion and per patient. The number of patients with MAT CVC detected 'open unexplained' care issues to be reviewed (NNR) in order to identify one that requires changes in MTM. RESULTS: In 1,876 target group patients, MAT CVC identified 6,915 care issues, of which 2,770 (40.1 %) were 'open unexplained'. At population level, ten MAT CVC criteria had particularly high potential for quality improvement. At patient level, 1,277 (68.1 %) target group patients had at least one 'open unexplained' care issue. For patients with four or more 'open unexplained' care issues, the NNR was 2 (95 % CI 2-2). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates potential ways of using MA TCVC as a key component of a collaborative MTM system. Strategies that promote documentation and sharing of explanations for deviating from guideline recommendations may enhance the utility of the approach.

Sex-specific-differences in cardiometabolic risk in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of sex-specific differences in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Thus, we evaluated the influence of gender on risk factors, complications, clinical care and adherence in patients with T1DM. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, sex-specific disparities in glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetic complications, concomitant medication use and adherence to treatment recommendations were evaluated in 225 consecutive patients (45.3% women) who were comparable with respect to age, diabetes duration, and body mass index. RESULTS: Although women with T1DM had a higher total cholesterol than men, triglycerides were higher in obese men and males with HbA1c>7% than in their female counterparts. No sex differences were observed in glycaemic control and in micro- or macrovascular complications. However, the subgroup analysis showed that nephropathy was more common in obese men, hyperlipidaemic women and all hypertensive patients, whereas peripheral neuropathy was more common in hyperlipidaemic women. Retinopathy was found more frequently in women with HbA1c>7%, obese men and in both sexes with a long duration of diabetes. The multivariate analysis revealed that microvascular complications were associated with the duration of disease and BMI in both sexes and with hyperlipidaemia in males. The overall adherence to interventions according to the guidelines was higher in men than in women. This adherence was concerned particularly with co-medication in patients diagnosed with hypertension, aspirin prescription in elderly patients and the achievement of target lipid levels following the prescription of statins. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed sex differences in lipids and overweight in patients with T1DM. Although glycaemic control and the frequency of diabetic complications were comparable between the sexes, the overall adherence to guidelines, particularly with respect to the prescription of statins and aspirin, was lower in women than in men.

A medication assessment tool to evaluate adherence to medication guideline in asthmatic children.

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is one of the commonest causes of morbidity and mortality in childhood. The goals of the present study were to design a valid medication assessment tool for evaluating the quality of medication use according to recommendations of updated asthma guidelines for children aged from 5 to 12 years, and to quantify adherence to guideline recommendations. SETTING: Two primary care settings in Scotland, UK. METHODS: Recommendations related to the long-term management of asthmatic children in the British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines were identified and corresponding criteria were created. These criteria were incorporated to generate an assessment tool named MAT ASTHMA-PAED. Two phases of field-testing were undertaken and the tool was also subject to examination by a focus group of specialist practitioners. Thereafter, MAT ASTHMA-PAED was modified accordingly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Applicability and adherence to each criterion and overall adherence to the MAT ASTHMA-PAED. RESULTS: The MAT ASTHMA-PAED field-testing was undertaken in two primary care practices in Scotland, United Kingdom and 77 asthmatic children were recruited. Results of the pilot study field-testing showed a high overall adherence of 70.0 % (95 % CI: 58.7-81.3 %) to the guidelines. Low adherence (<50 %) was seen for 4 criteria, whereas 8 criteria were considered high-adherence criteria (>70 %). The final MAT ASTHMA-PAED comprised of 25 criteria was produced based on the results of field testing and the opinions from the focus group. CONCLUSION: Although high utility of MAT ASTHMA-PAED criteria was found, there were gaps in the implementation of certain recommendations, particularly in relation to demonstrated satisfactory technique of inhaler. Moreover, further studies assessing the use of oral steroids and exercise-induced asthma, and wider implementation of MAT ASTHMA-PAED are required.