Successful closure of pharyngo-cutaneous and phayryngo-tracheal fistulas using removable hypopharyngeal stent after laryngectomy for laryngeal carcinoma.

Placement of removable stents to close pharyngo-cutaneous and tracheo-pharyngeal fistulas after laryngectomy has not been reported before. This case presents the feasibility of removable esophageal stent in closing pharyngo-cutaneous and tracheo-pharyngeal fistulas after laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer. Consecutive patients who underwent placement of removable esophageal stent for closing pharyngo-cutaneous and tracheo-pharyngeal fistulas after laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer. Three patients underwent successful stent placement in the hypopharynx. The stents were well tolerated. Patient one had the stent for 14 months, leading to complete healing of the fistula. Removal was successful. The second patient was palliated but died 8 weeks after stent placement. The third patient has successful palliation of his tracheo-esophageal fistula and the stent is being exchanged every 3-4 months to palliate his fistula. Closure of pharyngo-cutaneous and tracheo-esophageal fistulas is feasible with esophageal removable stents. These stents provide alternative options when dealing with these challenging problems.

Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic diagnosis.

This collection of summaries on endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) includes the best endoscopic markers of the extent of BE; the interpretation of the diagnosis of ultra-short BE; the criteria for endoscopic grading; the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic diagnosis; capsule and magnifying endoscopy; narrow band imaging; balloon cytology; the distinction between focal and diffuse dysplasia; the techniques for endoscopic detection of dysplasia and the grading systems; and the difficulty of interpretation of inflammatory or regenerative changes.

The relationship between the prevalence of nighttime gastroesophageal reflux disease and disease severity.

BACKGROUND: Nighttime gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD) prevalence and severity estimates vary substantially across studies. METHODS: We assessed nighttime GERD (NTG) prevalence and symptom frequency and severity through a web survey of US adults, using the GERD Symptom and Medication Questionnaire (GERD-SMQ), a validated symptom questionnaire. NTG was based on episodes of nighttime heartburn per week and time of occurrence. Symptom severity and impact were assessed and compared for GERD cases with and without NTG. RESULTS: GERD prevalence among respondents (n = 2,603) was 27%. Forty-five percent of symptomatic GERD respondents had NTG. Among respondents with both daytime and nighttime symptoms, 51% reported that nighttime symptoms were more bothersome. NTG respondents reported greater disease severity compared with those without (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: NTG symptoms are very common among those identified with GERD. People with nighttime symptoms have greater disease severity than those with exclusively or primarily daytime symptoms.

Surgical approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease: what the radiologist needs to know.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as gastroesophageal reflux resulting in symptoms or in injury to the esophageal epithelium. Although the medical management of GERD has improved, an increasing number of laparoscopic antireflux surgical procedures are being performed. Barium studies, endoscopy, manometry, and pH monitoring are all integral components of preoperative evaluation. Barium swallow examination must allow critical evaluation of esophageal peristalsis, the presence and extent of gastroesophageal reflux, and complications including esophagitis, stricture, and Barrett esophagus. It is crucial to identify and characterize hiatal hernia and longitudinal stricture, which can result in a shortened esophagus. In such cases, it becomes necessary for the surgeon to incorporate an esophageal lengthening procedure prior to fundoplication; otherwise, poor surgical outcome is likely. Normal postfundoplication radiographic findings as well as postoperative complications (eg, tight wrap, perforation, abscess, complete or partial dehiscence, recurrent stricture, recurrent hernia, intrathoracic migration of the wrap) must also be recognized and clearly understood by the radiologist. Given the chronic nature and prevalence of symptomatic GERD and the increasing number of patients undergoing surgical intervention, it is imperative that the radiologist understand the pre- and postsurgical evaluation of affected patients.

Risk factors for esophagitis in extreme acid hypersecretors with and without Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whereas severe duodenal ulcer is the hallmark of acid hypersecretion in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZE) and similar states, the esophagus also is at high risk. We quantified the incidence of esophagitis and various risk factors that might contribute to it. METHODS: Sixty-eight acid hypersecretors (basal acid output >15 mmol/h), 50 patients with ZE, and 18 patients without ZE with normal gastrin levels were studied by gastric analysis, serum gastrin levels, and endoscopy. In 44 of 68 patients, esophageal manometry was performed after the esophagus had healed. RESULTS: Erosive esophagitis, grade 2 or worse, was found in 65%; an additional 15% had heartburn only, for a total reflux disease incidence of 80%. ZE accounted for 95% of severe esophagitis. Patients with and without esophagitis had the same high overnight fasting gastric residual volume and acidity, as well as basal and peak acid and pepsin outputs. However, patients with esophagitis had a lower median lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) of 15.5 vs. 23 mm Hg in those without symptoms; the critical discriminator threshold was 16 mm Hg. Multivariate analysis further identified frequent vomiting and obesity as positive predictors of esophagitis, whereas Helicobacter pylori was a strong negative predictor (odds ratio, 0.16), possibly related to an elevated LESP in patients infected with H. pylori. CONCLUSIONS: Erosive esophagitis is very common in acid hypersecretors. Identified risk factors that could promote abnormal esophageal exposure to the high acid and pepsin levels in our population of hypersecretors were vomiting, LESP < 16 mm Hg, and obesity, whereas H. pylori appeared to protect the esophagus not by reduced acid, but through an elevated LESP.

Acid rereflux: a review, emphasizing detection by impedance, manometry, and scintigraphy, and the impact on acid clearing pathophysiology as well as interpreting the pH record.

Acid clearing, the interval while intraesophageal pH is < 4 after a traditional acid reflux event (RE), is a potential "blind spot" during pH monitoring, when reflux of acidified gastric contents may occur undetected by the pH probe. This is termed "acid rereflux." Acid rereflux comprised 61% (169/262) of acid REs in recumbent postprandial patients with severe GERD in two reports using simultaneous pH monitoring and manometry as well as multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) in one, and scintigraphy in the other. Acid rereflux events often recurred with short intervals between them. The pH probe alone was insufficient to detect most acid rereflux REs, since expanding pH criteria for an acid RE (> 1 unit fall while pH < 4) detected only 35% of acid rereflux REs. When a variety of patients and study conditions was examined, simultaneous manometry-pH monitoring found more frequent acid rereflux in the following situations: (1) patients with vs those without esophagitis; (2) recumbent vs upright posture, and (3) postprandial vs preprandial. Of pathophysiologic importance, acid rereflux in the blind spot is the most common cause of prolonged daytime acid REs in GERD patients. Of clinical importance, the 24-hr pH parameter "% acid exposure" should be relied upon most in interpreting the 24-hr pH record, because those parameters that relate to RE frequency may be inaccurate due to acid rereflux REs that are not counted. Furthermore, identifying as many REs as possible gives a more reliable indication of the severity of antireflux barrier incompetence, as well as more REs to correlate with patients symptoms that should improve sensitivity of the symptom index. Ambulatory simultaneous pH monitoring and MII will allow these and other roles for acid rereflux to be assessed during the patients normal day.

Treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Proton-pump inhibitors form the cornerstone of antireflux therapy for laryngopharyngeal reflux. In this article, we provide algorithms to guide the management of minor, major, and life-threatening cases.

Oral corticosteroids increase esophageal acid contact times in patients with stable asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is higher in people with asthma than in control populations. Predisposing factors for GERD development may include asthma medications such as prednisone. The objective of this study was to determine whether prednisone alters GERD parameters in people with asthma. DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. SETTING: University medical center clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty adults with stable, moderate persistent asthma with minimal esophageal reflux symptoms (less than three times a week) who were not receiving antireflux therapy. INTERVENTION: Prednisone, 60 mg/d, for 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Asthma, esophageal reflux symptoms, and spirometry were measured during baseline, placebo, and prednisone phases, each 7 days in duration. Dual-probe esophageal pH monitoring, esophageal and respiratory manometrics (20 subjects), and basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion (4 subjects) were measured after placebo and prednisone phases. There were significant increases in esophageal acid contact times at the distal and proximal pH probes during the prednisone phase. Total percentage of time that pH was < 4.0 at the distal probe was 2.5 +/- 0.4% for placebo compared with 5.9 +/- 0.9% for prednisone (p < 0.002). Total percentage of time that pH was < 4.0 at the proximal probe was 0.3 +/- 0.1% for placebo and 0.8 +/- 0.2% for prednisone (p < 0.0007). There were no significant changes in subject weight, spirometry, asthma or esophageal reflux symptoms, manometrics, or basal or stimulated gastric acid secretion. CONCLUSION: Prednisone, 60 mg/d for 7 days, increased esophageal acid contact times in this small population of people with stable asthma; however, the mechanism for this finding is unclear.