Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 18(8): 375-9, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22018170

RESUMO

Adherence to local guidelines on the use of HIV post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and hepatitis B vaccine following sexual assault was evaluated by means of audit. Forensic Medical Examiners (FMEs) were asked to complete an audit form after conducting sexual offence examinations at Gloucester Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC). Only one HIV PEP pack was prescribed during the six and a half month audit period. Examination of the SARC records of the allegations made by complainants did not reveal any high-risk cases involving a failure to offer HIV post-exposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure (PEPSE). The majority of the examinations performed at the SARC were carried out by trained sexual offence examiners (SOEs). The audit indicates that these SOEs were considering the appropriate use of HIV PEPSE and hepatitis B vaccine when they performed examinations. Some examinations were performed by general forensic medical examiners who completed the audit forms infrequently. It was not possible to determine whether these examiners were considering the appropriate use of HIV PEPSE and hepatitis treatments.


Assuntos
Auditoria Clínica , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Delitos Sexuais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Controle de Formulários e Registros , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...