Clinical information predicting severe obstructive sleep apnea: A cross-sectional study of patients waiting for sleep diagnostics.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent with serious health consequences. Demand for diagnostic studies is high, in many countries exceeding capacity. PURPOSE: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to identify predictors of severe OSA among patients on waiting lists for sleep studies, to better prioritize time to examinations. METHODS: The sample comprised 3646 patients (30.3% women) referred to a university clinic in Western Norway with suspected OSA. All patients underwent respiratory polygraphy. Severe OSA was defined by an apnea-hypopnea index ≥30. Information on symptoms (snoring, breathing cessations, daytime sleepiness) and medical history was collected with questionnaires, including prior diagnosis of angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, hypertension, depression or diabetes. Blood pressure was measured with thresholds of 90 and 140 mmHg defining diastolic and systolic hypertension. RESULTS: 15.7% had severe OSA. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors positively associated with severe OSA were increasing age, male sex, snoring, breathing cessations, BMI ≥30, diastolic hypertension, self-reported history of hypertension, and self-reported myocardial infarction. A prediction score (range 0-5) devised from 5 of these items (age ≥50, snoring, breathing cessations, BMI ≥30, and self-reported hypertension) had a sensitivity of 96.2% and a negative predictive value of 97.1% for severe OSA, when a score ≥2 was set as cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a prediction score derived from simple, easily available data, patients unlikely to suffer from severe OSA can be identified, and thus facilitate more urgent consideration of patients more likely to have severe OSA.

ILD-specific health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis-associated ILD compared with IPF.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) are fibrotic ILDs with divergent disease populations. Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQL) in SSc-ILD relative to IPF. METHODS: We used the Kings Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD) to compare HRQL in a cross-sectional study of 57 patients with IPF and 29 patients with SSc-ILD. Analysis of covariance was used to adjust for age, gender and lung function. RESULTS: The unadjusted mean K-BILD score was 63.1 (95% CI 57.1 to 69.1) among patients with SSc-ILD, as compared with 54.7 (51.8-57.5) among those with IPF (p=0.005). However, this difference in HRQL was attenuated after adjustment for age, gender and lung function. In a multivariable model, only forced vital capacity was associated with K-BILD scores. K-BILD scores were correlated with both forced vital capacity and with other relevant HRQL measures, regardless of ILD diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Patients with SSc-ILD may have better ILD-specific quality of life than patients with IPF, but this difference appears to be driven primarily by better lung function. These results underscore the impact of lung function on HRQL in fibrotic ILD and the utility of K-BILD to assess HRQL in SSc-ILD.