RESUMO
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill composites for Knoop microhardness (KHN), microtensile bond strength (MTBS) to dentin in occlusal cavities, and fracture strength (FS) in molars with mesialocclusal- distal restoration. Disk-shaped samples with different thicknesses (2 or 4 mm) of low-viscosity (SDR Flow, Dentsply) and high-viscosity bulk-fill composites (Filtek BulkFill, 3M ESPE; and Tetric-N Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared for top and bottom KHN analysis (n=10). MTBS to dentin and fracture pattern was evaluated in human molars with occlusal cavities restored with (n=10): conventional nanocomposite (Z350XT, 3M ESPE), low-viscosity (Filtek Bulk-fill Flow, 3M ESPE) or high-viscosity bulk-fill composites (Filtek BulkFill). The FS and fracture pattern of human molar with mesial-occlusal-distal restorations submitted or not to thermomechanical cycling were investigated (n=10) using: intact tooth (control), and restoration based on conventional microhybrid composite (Z250, 3M ESPE), low-viscosity (SDR Flow) or high-viscosity bulk-fill composites (Filtek BulkFill). The data were submitted to split-plot ANOVA (KHN), one-way ANOVA (MTBS), two-way ANOVA (FS) followed by Tukey's test (α=0.05). For KHN, there was no significant difference for the resin composites between the top and bottom. For MTBS, no significant differences among the materials were detected; however, the low-viscosity composite presented lower frequency of adhesive failures. For FS, there was no significant difference between composites and intact tooth regardless of thermomechanical cycling. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill composites have comparable microhardness and microtensile bond strength when used in occlusal restorations. Likewise, the bulk-fill composites present similar fracture strength in molars with mesio-occlusal-distal restorations.
RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar resinas compostas bulk- -fill de baixa e alta viscosidade quanto à microdureza Knoop (KHN), resistência de união a microtração (MTBS) em cavidades oclusais e carga à fratura (FS) em molares com restauração mesio-oclusal-distal. Amostras em forma de disco com diferentes espessuras (2 ou 4 mm) de resinas bulk-fill de baixa viscosidade (SDR Flow, Dentsply) e alta viscosidade (Filtek BulkFill, 3M ESPE; e Tetric-N Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) foram obtidas para análise de KHN no topo e na base (n = 10). A MTBS em dentina e o padrão de fratura foram avaliados em molares humanos com cavidades oclusais restauradas com (n = 10): resina composta nanoparticulada convencional (Z350XT, 3M ESPE), resinas bulk-fill de baixa viscosidade (Filtek Bulk-fill Flow, 3M ESPE) ou alta viscosidade (Filtek BulkFill). Foram investigados a FS e o padrão de fratura de molares humanos em restaurações mesial-ocluso-distais sub metidas ou não à ciclagem termomecânica (n = 10), sendo: dente íntegro (controle), e restaurações baseadas em resina composta microhíbrida convencional (Z250, 3M ESPE); resinas bulk-fill de baixa viscosidade (SDR Flow) ou alta viscosidade (Filtek BulkFill). Os dados foram submetidos a split-plot ANOVA (KHN), one-way ANOVA (MTBS), two-way ANOVA (FS) seguidos do teste de Tukey (α = 0,05). Para KHN, não houve diferença significativa entre o topo e a base para as resinas compostas. Para MTBS, não foram detectadas diferenças significativas entre os materiais; entretanto, a resina bulk-fill de baixa viscosidade apresentou menor frequência de falhas adesivas. Para FS, não houve diferença significativa entre os materiais e o dente íntegro, independentemente da ciclagem termomecânica. As resinas bulk-fill de baixa e alta viscosidade têm microdureza e resistência à microtração comparáveis quando usados em restaurações oclusais. Da mesma forma, as resinas bulk-fill apresentam resistência à fratura semelhante em molares com restaurações mesio-oclusal-distais.
RESUMO
Eight cases of snakebite involving 5 flocks were seen in chickens, ducks and turkeys in the Avian Ambulatory Clinic of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Zaria, between July 1983 and August 1990. Most of the clients resided in areas with large canopies of trees and bushes. There was a large gully just behind the residential areas. Twenty-one birds were bitten; chickens constituted 85.7%, turkeys 12% and ducks 4.8% of this number. Hens incubating eggs were most vulnerable. Cocks were usually bitten when they attacked the snakes. Clinical signs were similar to those reported in other animal species. Gross lesions included congestion of visceral organs and hemorrhage in the viscera, around the bite sites and in the sc tissues. There was also im edema around bite sites. The fatality rate was 87.5%.
