Phase I study of concurrent weekly docetaxel and repeated samarium-153 lexidronam in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Samarium-153 ((153)Sm) lexidronam is a bone-targeting radiopharmaceutical with a short physical half-life and a favorable toxicity profile. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of a concurrent combination of weekly docetaxel with repeated (153)Sm-lexidronam in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A conventional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used for this study. Patients were treated in three cohorts comprising two cycles of weekly docetaxel at 25, 30, and 35 mg/m(2), respectively, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in combination with (153)Sm (1 mCi/kg) on day 1. Unacceptable hematologic toxicity (UHT) was defined as more than 7 days delay in therapy for inadequate counts: an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) more than 1,000/microL and platelets more than 70,000/microL were required at days 8 and 15 and ANC more than 1,500/microL and platelets more than 100,000/microL were required at cycle 2, day 1. If counts had not recovered by day 56 of either combination cycle, UHT was declared. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were treated in three cohorts. Two patients in separate cohorts experienced UHT; the maximum-tolerated dose for this regimen was not reached. The median interval between (153)Sm doses was 35 days (range, 27 to 57 days). The only significant toxicity was mild, transient myelosuppression. Five patients (28%) experienced grade 3 hematologic toxicity. There were no grade > or = 4 hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities. CONCLUSION: Two dosing cycles consisting of weekly docetaxel and monthly (153)Sm-lexidronam were well tolerated and feasible in this CRPC population.

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibition and chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases.

PURPOSE: To further assess preclinical and early clinical evidence that imatinib mesylate, a platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitor, modulates taxane activity in prostate cancer and bone metastases, a randomized study was conducted. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Men with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases (n = 144) were planned for equal randomization to i.v. 30 mg/m(2) docetaxel on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 42 days with 600 mg imatinib daily or placebo, for an improvement in median progression-free survival from 4.5 to 7.5 months (two-sided alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.20). Secondary end points included differential toxicity and bone turnover markers, tumor phosphorylated PDGFR (p-PDGFR) expression, and modulation of p-PDGFR in peripheral blood leukocytes. RESULTS: Accrual was halted early because of adverse gastrointestinal events. Among 116 evaluable men (57 docetaxel + imatinib; 59 docetaxel + placebo), respective median times to progression were 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 3.1-7.5) and 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 3.0-6.8; P = 0.58, log-rank test). Excess grade 3 toxicities (n = 23) in the docetaxel + imatinib group were principally fatigue and gastrointestinal. Tumor p-PDGFR expression was observed in 12 of 14 (86%) evaluable bone specimens. In peripheral blood leukocytes, p-PDGFR reduction was more likely in docetaxel + imatinib-treated patients compared with docetaxel + placebo (P < 0.0001), as were reductions in urine N-telopeptides (P = 0.004) but not serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: These clinical and translational results question the value of PDGFR inhibition with taxane chemotherapy in prostate cancer bone metastases and are at variance with the preclinical studies. This discordance requires explanation.

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor imatinib mesylate and docetaxel: a modular phase I trial in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To study the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) inhibitor imatinib mesylate in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC), alone and in combination with docetaxel, we designed a modular phase I trial. Our goals were to (1) evaluate the toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel with imatinib, and (2) evaluate the decline of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) induced by imatinib alone, and imatinib and docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight men with AIPC and bone metastases were enrolled to receive imatinib 600 mg daily lead-in for 30 days, then imatinib 600 mg daily and one of six possible doses of docetaxel weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. RESULTS: During the imatinib lead-in module, one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) event was observed, while two (7%) of 28 had PSA decline (both < 50%). With imatinib and docetaxel, cycle 1 DLT was found in three of 12 patients at docetaxel 30 mg/m(2), in three of four patients at docetaxel 45 mg/m(2), and in five of six patients at docetaxel 35 mg/m(2). DLTs (n = 40 total events) were principally fatigue (35%) and nausea (20%). Eight (38%) of 21 had PSA decline greater than 50%, and six (29%) of 21 had PSA decline less than 50%. Serial PSA declines beyond 18 months were observed. PDGFR-expressing tumor declined on serial bone marrow biopsies with combination therapy alone. CONCLUSION: With imatinib 600 mg daily, the maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel was determined to be 30 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Long-term responses were observed. The role of imatinib in modulating outcomes to docetaxel in AIPC is being tested in a randomized phase II trial.

Randomized, multicenter, phase II trial of two multicomponent regimens in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Several multicomponent regimens have been reported to be useful in advanced androgen-independent prostate cancer. We used a randomized phase II design to evaluate and compare two such regimens. Patients were accrued primarily in the community setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive, androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: either ketoconazole/doxorubicin alternating with vinblastine/estramustine (KA/VE) or paclitaxel, estramustine, and oral etoposide (TEE). Patients were prospectively stratified on the basis of disease volume. The primary end points were response and overall survival time. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were registered; 71 are included in the analysis. By the criterion of an 80% prostate-specific antigen reduction maintained for at least 8 weeks, 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the TEE arm responded, whereas 11 (32%) of 34 assigned to KA/VE responded. Median survival was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5 to 21.2 months) in the TEE arm and 23.4 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 30.6 months) for patients treated with KA/VE. Many patients (24%) failed to complete at least 6 weeks of therapy, including five (8%) treatment-related early deaths. CONCLUSION: Each of these regimens produced clinically significant responses, and the observed median survival (18.9 months for all 71 patients) compares favorably with previously published results, especially in the community setting. Nonetheless, it is apparent that these first-generation regimens must be applied judiciously, and thus we view efforts at better patient selection and the development of more tolerable therapies as higher priorities than carrying either of these regimens to phase III evaluation in the cooperative group setting.

Phase II study of dolastatin-10 as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.

Dolastatin-10 is a potent inhibitor of microtubule assembly derived from the sea hare, which displayed significant antitumor activity in preclinical models. We conducted a phase II study of dolastatin-10 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Fourteen patients received doses ranging from 300 microg/m(2) to 450 microg/m(2) as an intravenous push every 21 days. There were no major objective responses. Toxicity was mainly hematologic, with grade III or IV granulocytopenia occurring in 9 of 42 treatment courses. Other toxic effects were generally mild. Dolastatin-10 lacks clinically significant activity in advanced colorectal cancer when used in this dose and schedule.