Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
2.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 19(1): 77, 2021 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957934

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, commonly referred to as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), was created to increase access to primary care, improve quality of care, and decrease healthcare costs. A key provision in the law that mandated expansion of state Medicaid programme changed when states were given the option to voluntarily expand Medicaid. Our study sought to measure the impact of ACA Medicaid expansion on preventable hospitalization (PH) rates, a measure of access to primary care. METHODS: We performed an interrupted time series analysis of quarterly hospitalization rates across eight states from 2012 to 2015. Segmented regression analysis was utilized to determine the impact of policy reform on PH rates. RESULTS: The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion led to decreased rates of PH (improved access to care); however, the finding was not significant (coefficient estimate: -0.0059, CI -0.0225, 0.0107, p = 0.4856). Healthcare system characteristics, such as Medicaid spending per enrollee and Medicaid income eligibility, were associated with a significant decrease in rates of PH (improved access to care). However, the Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index (physician reimbursement) and states with a Democratic state legislature had a significant increase in rates of PH (poor access to care). CONCLUSION: Health policy reform and healthcare delivery characteristics impact access to care. Researchers should continue evaluating such policy changes across more states over longer periods of time. Researchers should translate these findings into cost analysis for state policy-makers to make better-informed decisions for their constituents. CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE: Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions are a feasible method for evaluating policy and measuring access to primary care. Policy alone cannot improve access to care. Other factors (trust, communication, policy-makers' motivations and objectives, etc.) must be addressed to improve access.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Idoso , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Medicare , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estados Unidos
3.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 27(3): 1577-91, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27524786

RESUMO

Primary care access (PCA) for the homeless can prove challenging, especially during periods of economic distress. In the United States, the most recent recession may have presented additional barriers to accessing care. Limited safety-net resources traditionally used by the homeless may have also been used by the non-homeless, resulting in delays in seeking treatment for the homeless. Using hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitivity (ACS) conditions as a proxy measure for PCA, this study investigated the recession's impact on PCA for the homeless and non-homeless in four states. The State Inpatient Databases were used to identify ACS admissions. Findings from this study indicate the recession was a barrier to PCA for homeless people who were uninsured. Ensuring that economically-disadvantaged populations have the ability to obtain insurance coverage is crucial to facilitating PCA. With targeted outreach efforts, the Affordable Care Act provides an opportunity for expanding coverage to the homeless.


Assuntos
Recessão Econômica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Doença Crônica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Raciais , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Am J Manag Care ; 22(4): 250-6, 2016 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27143290

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the likelihood of readmission (adjusted for severity on first admission) for pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) differs between Medicaid managed care and non-managed care. STUDY DESIGN: De-identified patients were retrospectively selected from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database of the Children's Hospital Association (CHA). The cohort of 42 hospitals across 25 states included discharges between 2008 and 2011 for patients who were receiving Medicaid at the time of service and had T1D as their diagnosis. METHODS: Multiple factors and co-variants for readmission were analyzed by logistic regression, including age, race, gender, severity of illness, and state of admission. RESULTS: Of 14,544 T1D discharges with Medicaid, 4985 were readmitted, including 1792 readmitted for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Despite similar rates of DKA between the managed care and non-managed care cohorts, overall 90-day readmission was 1.12 times more likely for Medicaid patients on non-managed care plans than those on managed care (odds ratio, 1.12; range = 1.04-1.20; both adjusted for severity of illness). Significant contributors were race, age, and gender; the relationship of location (state) and days between readmissions was also significant. The conservative estimate of cost reduction from Medicaid managed care related to lower readmission rate for pediatric T1D across CHA institutions between 2008 and 2011 was $2.6 million. CONCLUSIONS: From the largest, national, defined cohort available for contemporary study, youths with T1D on Medicaid managed care plans were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitais Pediátricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Medicaid/organização & administração , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
5.
Bull Menninger Clin ; 76(1): 1-20, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22409204

RESUMO

The role of acute care inpatient psychiatry, public and private, has changed dramatically since the 1960s, especially as recent market forces affecting the private sector have had ripple effects on publicly funded mental health care. Key stakeholders' experiences, perceptions, and opinions regarding the role of acute care psychiatry in distressed markets of publicly funded mental health care were examined. A qualitative research study was conducted using semi-structured thematic interviews with 52 senior mental health system administrators, clinical directors and managers, and nonclinical policy specialists. Participants were selected from markets in six regions of the United States that experienced recent significant closures of acute care psychiatric beds. Qualitative data analyses yielded findings that clustered around three sets of higher order themes: structure of care, service delivery barriers, and outcomes. Structure of care suggests that acute care psychiatry is seen as part of a continuum of services; service delivery barriers inhibit effective delivery of services and are perceived to include economic, regulatory, and political factors; outcomes include fragmentation of mental health care services across the continuum, the shift of mental health care to the criminal justice system, and market-specific issues affecting mental health care. Findings delineate key stakeholders' perceptions regarding the role acute care psychiatry plays in the continuum of care for publicly funded mental health and suggest that public mental health care is inefficacious. Results carry implications for policy makers regarding strategies/policies to improve optimal utilization of scarce resources for mental health care, including greater focus on psychotherapy.


Assuntos
Pessoal Administrativo , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Financiamento Governamental/economia , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/economia , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Doença Aguda , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Controle de Custos/economia , Direito Penal/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Número de Leitos em Hospital/economia , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Alta do Paciente/economia , Política , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Estados Unidos
6.
Chest ; 137(3): 692-700, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20202950

RESUMO

The issue of tobacco industry responsibility for population health problems and compensation for their treatment has been growing since the 1960s. In 1999, the state attorneys general collectively launched the largest class action lawsuit in US history and sued the tobacco industry to recover the costs of caring for smokers. In what became known as the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), states were rewarded billions of dollars and won concessions regarding how cigarettes could be advertised and targeted to minors. Ten years after this settlement, much is known about how MSA monies were distributed and how states have used the money. There is some understanding about how much of the money went toward offsetting the health-care costs attributable to smoking and whether resources were allocated to efforts to reduce smoking in a particular state. However, there are few data on what effect, if any, the MSA had on tobacco control locally and nationally. This commentary explores these issues, as well as how the tobacco industry has evolved to offset the losses incurred by the settlement. Finally, an analysis of the complexities of current tobacco policy making is provided so that physicians and other health-care advocacy groups can more completely understand the present-day political dynamics and be more effective in shaping tobacco control policy in the future.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Fumar , Indústria do Tabaco/economia , Indústria do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/economia , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
7.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 27(2): 159-65, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19254048

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Markov models have been the standard framework for predicting long-term clinical and economic outcomes using the surrogate marker endpoints from clinical trials. However, they are complex, have intensive data requirements and are often difficult for decision makers to understand. Recent developments in modelling software have made it possible to use discrete-event simulation (DES) to model outcomes in HIV. Using published results from 48-week trial data as model inputs, Markov model and DES modelling approaches were compared in terms of clinical outcomes at 5 years and lifetime cost-effectiveness estimates. METHODS: A randomly selected cohort of 100 antiretroviral-naive patients with a mean baseline CD4+ T-cell count of 175 cells/mm3 treated with lopinavir/ritonavir was selected from Abbott study M97-720. Parameter estimates from this cohort were used to populate both a Markov and a DES model, and the long-term estimates for these cohorts were compared. The models were then modified using the relative risk of undetectable viral load as reported for atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in the published BMS 008 study. This allowed us to compare the mean cost effectiveness of the models. The clinical outcomes included mean change in CD4+ T-cell count, and proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA (viral load [VL]) <50 copies/mL, VL 50-400 copies/mL and VL >400 copies/mL. US wholesale acquisition costs (year 2007 values) were used in the mean cost-effectiveness analysis, and the cost and QALY data were discounted at 3%. RESULTS: The results show a slight predictive advantage of the DES model for clinical outcomes. The DES model could capture direct input of CD4+ T-cell count, and proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA VL <50 copies/mL, VL 50-400 copies/mL and VL >400 copies/mL over a 48-week period, which the Markov model could not. The DES and Markov model estimates were similar to the actual clinical trial estimates for 1-year clinical results; however, the DES model predicted more detailed outcomes and had slightly better long-term (5-year) predictive validity than the Markov model. Similar cost estimates were derived from the Markov model and the DES. Both models predict cost savings at 5 and 10 years, and over a lifetime for the lopinavir/ritonavir treatment regimen as compared with an atazanavir regimen. CONCLUSION: The DES model predicts the course of a disease naturally, with few restrictions. This may give the model superior face validity with decision makers. Furthermore, this model automatically provides a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, which is cumbersome to perform with a Markov model. DES models allow inclusion of more variables without aggregation, which may improve model precision. The capacity of DES for additional data capture helps explain why this model consistently predicts better survival and thus greater savings than the Markov model. The DES model is better than the Markov model in isolating long-term implications of small but important differences in crucial input data.


Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Infecções por HIV/economia , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Pirimidinonas/economia , Ritonavir/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacoeconomia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Lopinavir , Modelos Econométricos , Modelos Estatísticos , Pirimidinonas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Ritonavir/efeitos adversos , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico
8.
Clin Drug Investig ; 27(12): 807-17, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18020538

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Selection of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for antiretroviral-experienced patients should involve balancing multiple factors, including clinical efficacy, adverse-event risk, resistance concerns, cost effectiveness and expected budget impact. The efficacy of a regimen and its durability, as demonstrated in controlled clinical trials, must be considered in the light of short- and long-term economic impacts on the healthcare system. These impacts may vary based on drug costs, costs of reported adverse effects, the regimen's likelihood of contributing to viral resistance to second-line therapies and the marginal cost differences between other healthcare resources used over a patient's lifetime. Risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) may be of concern in the selection of ART, because differences in CHD risk factors have been reported for different regimens, and heart disease is both a deadly and costly condition. This study set out to estimate the long-term combined effects of HIV disease and antiretroviral-related risk for CHD on quality-adjusted survival and healthcare costs for antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, Spain, Italy and France. METHODS: A previously validated Markov model was updated with 2006 cost estimates for each of the four countries and supplemented with the Framingham CHD risk equation. In the model, the average patient was male, aged 37 years, with a baseline 10-year CHD risk of 4.6%. Patients started with either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV) as the protease inhibitor (PI). Clinical trial results, local drug costs and AIDS and CHD cost estimates were used to estimate the differences between these two therapies. RESULTS: There was a significant advantage using LPV/r over ATV+RTV, which varied depending on the country's cost structure and assumptions related to drug efficacy. There was a comparative benefit for experienced patients in quality-adjusted life-months (QALM) of 4.6 (the net gain after subtracting quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] lost owing to CHD risk). In addition, there were 5- and 10-year overall cost savings of between euro947 and euro6594 per patient after 5 years, and an impact ranging from a cost increase of euro308 (for France) to a cost saving of euro7388 (for Spain) at year 10. The lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from dominant for Spain to euro11 856/QALY for Italy. CONCLUSION: LPV/r was a highly cost-effective regimen relative to ATV+RTV for the treatment of HIV for each of the four countries examined in this study. The effect of LPV/r on long-term CHD risk was minimal compared with the increased risk of AIDS/death projected for a less efficacious PI-based regimen. The cost of lipid-lowering drugs and treatment for CHD was insignificant compared with the overall cost savings from LPV/r therapy. The choice of regimen for antiretroviral-experienced patients should be based on a regimen's expected efficacy and durability for countries with similar cost structure to those examined here.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Oligopeptídeos/economia , Piridinas/economia , Pirimidinonas/economia , Ritonavir/economia , Adulto , Sulfato de Atazanavir , Doença das Coronárias/induzido quimicamente , Doença das Coronárias/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , França/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/economia , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Lopinavir , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
9.
Clin Drug Investig ; 27(7): 443-52, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17563124

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness and long-term combined effects of HIV disease and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy-related risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) on quality-adjusted survival and healthcare costs for ARV-experienced patients. METHODS: A previously validated Markov model was updated and supplemented with the Framingham CHD risk equation. The representative patient in the model was male, aged 37 years and had a baseline 10-year CHD risk of 4.6%. Patients started with either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV) as the protease inhibitor (PI). The proportions of patients with viral suppression below 400 and 50 copies/mL, respectively, at week 48 reported in clinical trials were used to estimate the differences between these two therapies. The daily ARV costs were $US 24.60 for LPV/r capsules (2005 costs) and $US 26.54 for LPV/r tablets (2006 costs), $US 29.76 for ATV and $US 8.57 for ritonavir (2005 costs). Costs of other ARV drugs were taken from average wholesale drug reports for 2005. The cost of AIDS events was estimated from Medicaid billing databases and reflected a medical care system perspective and 2005 treatment costs. Cost-effectiveness calculations assumed a lifetime time horizon. The effects of different model assumptions were tested in a multiway sensitivity analysis by combining extreme values of parameters. RESULTS: The model estimated a clinical and economic advantage to using LPV/r over ATV+RTV, which varied depending upon the use of LPV/r capsules or tablets. Using LPV/r capsules was comparatively beneficial for ARV-experienced patients in quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) of 4.6 (corrected for differences in CHD risk) compared with ATV+RTV. In addition, there were 5- and 10-year overall per-patient cost savings of $US 17,995 and $US 21,298, respectively. Estimates for the LPV/r tablet formulation approved in 2005 (assuming similar efficacy) improved cost savings over 5- and 10-year periods to $US 19,598 and $US 23,126 per patient, respectively, because of a drug price differential. Sensitivity analysis tested numerous assumptions about the model cost and efficacy parameters and found that the results were robust to most changes. Model limitations were the uncertainty associated with the model parameters used. CONCLUSION: LPV/r appears to be a highly cost-effective regimen relative to ATV+RTV for the treatment of HIV. The long-term CHD risk associated with LPV/r was minimal compared with the increased risk of AIDS/death and costs projected for a less efficacious PI-based regimen.


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/economia , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/economia , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinonas/economia , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Ritonavir/economia , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/etiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Coleta de Dados , Combinação de Medicamentos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lopinavir , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Estatísticos , Pirimidinonas/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ritonavir/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Carga Viral
13.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 10(5): 444-50, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15552770

RESUMO

A field of study for public health finance has never been adequately developed. Consequently, very little is known about the relationships, types, and amount of finances that fund the public health system in America. This research was undertaken to build on the sparse knowledge of public health finance by examining the value of performance measurement systems to financial analysis. A correlational study was conducted to examine the associations between public health system performance of the 10 essential public health services and funding patterns of 50 local health departments in a large state. The specific objectives were to investigate if different levels and types of revenues, expenditures, and other demographic variables in a jurisdiction are correlated to performance. Pearson correlation analysis did not conclusively show strong associations; however, statistically significant positive associations primarily between higher levels of performance and jurisdiction taxes per capita were found.


Assuntos
Administração em Saúde Pública/economia , Administração em Saúde Pública/normas , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos
15.
J Agromedicine ; 9(2): 131-46, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19785212

RESUMO

Agricultural productivity and the health of farming populations are both influenced by environmental change. Farming activities also affect the environment. Six principal dimensions of this agriculture/environment interrelation are explored: water resources; erosion and nonpoint source pollution; pesticides and fertilizers; deforestation; population pressures; and biodiversity. Changes in these environmental dimensions are critical to the health of rural populations in developing countries. National and international policies and incentives for the protection of agricultural environments are described.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Países em Desenvolvimento , Ecossistema , Biodiversidade , Clima , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Saúde da População Rural
16.
J Agromedicine ; 8(2): 113-23, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12853276

RESUMO

The field of agromedicine faces numerous policy and organizational development challenges as it enters the 21st Century. To gauge these, the authors surveyed attendees of the 14th Annual Meeting of the North American Agromedicine Consortium (NAAC) in Charleston, South Carolina, in November 2001. Survey questions dealt with agromedicine policy issues, organizational/programmatic issues, the agromedicine core areas, the usefulness of state reports at the meeting, and important policy, organizational and programmatic issues that were missing from, or insufficiently covered at the meeting. While respondents clearly saw serious obstacles facing agromedicine as it continues to develop, they also felt that the NAAC and the profession served important roles in furthering education, research and client service.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...