Evaluation of automated nucleic acid extraction devices for application in HCV NAT.

BACKGROUND: To further improve the safety of the blood supply, various national blood transfusion organizations presently use or are in the process of implementing routine HCV NAT in minipools. According to the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) of the European Union, the HCV NAT detection limit of the assay should be 100 IU per mL (270 geq/mL) for testing initial plasma pools. Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) regulations stipulate that 5000 IU per mL (13,500 geq/mL) must be detected to calculate the amount contributed by individual donations composing the minipool. The sensitivity for HCV RNA extraction achieved by three commercially available laboratory kits was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nucleic acids from 1-in-3 serial dilutions of an HCV RNA run control (Pelispy, CLB) were extracted with three kits (Cobas Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems; BioRobot 9604, Qiagen; and NucliSens Extractor, Organon Teknika). HCV PCR of all extracts was performed using a second-generation Cobas Amplicor HCV test and the Cobas Amplicor analyzer. RESULTS: The manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor setups allow a 95-percent HCV RNA detection limit of 129, 82, and 12 geq per mL, respectively. The maximal pool size for the manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor kits that would still meet the PEI criteria for HCV NAT in minipools was calculated at 104, 164, and 1125 donations, respectively. CONCLUSION: All three HCV NAT kits evaluated meet the criteria set by CPMP and PEI. The highest sensitivity for HCV NAT screening can be achieved with the high-volume NucliSens Extractor method in combination with the Cobas Amplicor HCV v2.0 test on the Cobas Amplicor analyzer.

A simple strategy to look back on posttransfusion hepatitis B in a multitransfused patient.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In January 1996, a case of hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroconversion in a multitransfused patient was reported to the blood bank From March through October 1995, the patient had received 23 units of red cells and 30 units of pooled platelet concentrates, encompassing an exposure to a total of 200 whole blood donations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to trace hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative but HBV-infectious blood donation(s), we tested samples of the donors obtained > or = 3 months after the implicated donations for anti-HBc (Corezyme EIA, Abbott). From 172/200 donors, archived samples of subsequent donations were available for this purpose. The remaining 28 donors were reinvited to the blood bank to obtain an additional blood sample for anti-HBc testing. RESULTS: 1/200 follow-up donor samples was anti-HBc-positive. Retrospective testing of the implicated HBsAg-negative blood donation of this donor revealed anti-HBc-negative and HBV-DNA-positive results. The patient was transfused with the platelets of the HBV-infectious donation. On looking back, the other blood products prepared from this HBV-infectious donation caused posttransfusion HBV infection (PT-HBV) in 2 additional patients. CONCLUSION: Anti-HBc testing on mainly archived follow-up samples of 200 donors implicated in PT-HBV was a rapid, simple cost-effective and donor-friendly method to identify an infectious but HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-negative and HBV-DNA PCR-positive blood donation. Routine anti-HBc screening would not have prevented this HBV transmission.

New hepatitis B virus mutant form in a blood donor that is undetectable in several hepatitis B surface antigen screening assays.

BACKGROUND: Envelope mutant forms of hepatitis B virus (HBV), impairing HBV antibody recognition, have been reported with mutations in single or multiple sites of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) group-specific "a" determinant. Blood donors infected with such an HBsAg mutant form of HBV may escape detection by HBsAg screening assays and therefore may affect the safety of the blood supply. CASE REPORT: A repeat blood donor became HBsAg-reactive in an enzyme immunoassay. Confirmatory testing yielded negative results for HBsAg in a radioimmunoassay and in four enzyme immunoassays used in blood donor screening. The specificity of the HBsAg reactivity in the first enzyme immunoassay was confirmed by HBsAg neutralization with antibody to HBsAg. Additional HBV confirmatory test results were positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and antibody to hepatitis B e antigen; negative for antibody to HBsAg and for hepatitis B e antigen; and positive for HBV DNA. DNA sequence analysis of the "a" determinant region of HBsAg revealed amino acid substitutions from Q (Gln) to R (Arg) at codon 129 and from M (Met) to T (Thr) at codon 133. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the presence of HBsAg mutant forms of HBV in a West European blood donor population that were undetected by several HBsAg screening assays. Adaptation of HBsAg screening is indicated to overcome deficiencies in sensitivity in detecting HBsAg mutant forms of HBV. Screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen or HBV DNA may also detect blood donors infected with HBsAg mutant forms of HBV

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies detected by new assays that are enhanced for HIV-1 subtype O.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtype O infections are not reliably detected by commonly used anti-HIV-1/2 screening assays. Therefore, anti-HIV-1/2 assays have been modified to increase their sensitivity in detecting antibodies to HIV-1 subtype O. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two new anti-HIV-1/2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (Abbott Plus and Ortho Enhanced) were compared with a currently used anti-HIV-1/2 ELISA (Abbott Recombinant) in various serum panels: 91 Western blot-confirmed anti-HIV-1-positive samples, 20 samples from Western blot-confirmed HIV-1-infected patients in log3 serial dilutions, and 1463 samples from consecutive, volunteer, nonremunerated blood donors. RESULTS: Among 91 anti-HIV-1 Western blot-positive samples, 2 (2.2%) were missed by the Abbott Recombinant ELISA, but all 91 were detected by the Abbott Plus and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs. In contrast, two discrepant samples were found to react in viral lysate-based assays. In serial dilutions, Ortho Enhanced ELISA was significantly less sensitive than the Abbott Recombinant and Abbott Plus ELISAs, with the latter two being of comparable sensitivity. The specificities of Abbott Recombinant, Abbott Plus, and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs in 1463 blood donors were 100, 99.93, and 99.86 percent, respectively. Routine testing of 29,102 donations with the enhanced Abbott Plus ELISA revealed a specificity of 99.93 percent. CONCLUSION: Two Western blot-confirmed anti-HIV-1-positive samples were missed by the Abbott Recombinant ELISA but detected by the Abbott Plus and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs. The analytic sensitivity of the Ortho Enhanced ELISA was inferior to that of both Abbott ELISAs. The specificities of the Abbott Recombinant, Abbott Plus, and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs were comparable.

A new low-incidence antigen in the Kell blood group system: VLAN (KEL25).

A multilaboratory investigation has identified a new low-incidence antigen "VLAN' on the red cells of a blood donor. The VLAN antigen is destroyed by 2-aminoethylisothiouronium bromide treatment of the donor's red cells suggesting an association with the Kell system. Monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of erythrocyte antigen analysis with anti-VLAN and with several mouse monoclonal antibodies directed at epitopes on the Kell glycoprotein gave positive results, indicating that the VLAN antigen is located on the Kell glycoprotein. The VLAN red blood cells have the common Kell phenotype: KEL:-1,2,-3,4,5,-6,7,-10,11,12,13,14,-17,18,19,-21,22,-23,-24. Additional serologic data indicate that the VLAN antigen is not part of any other ISBT blood group system, collection or series. A family study showed that the VLAN antigen is inherited since the red cells of two sisters and one niece of the propositus are also VLAN+. The ISBT Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens has assigned VLAN to the Kell blood group system as KEL25 (number for computer listings 006025).

Swine dysentery in a sow herd. II. Comparison of a direct fluorescent antibody test with selective culture in the laboratory diagnosis.

During and after an outbreak of swine dysentery (Doyle) two diagnostic techniques were compared: a direct fluorescent antibody test and a selective culture method. The latter was more sensitive, provided the animals were not medicated and the samples were processed on the day of collection. The widespread use of chemoprophylaxis makes selective culture as a diagnostic aid under Dutch conditions highly impractical.