Effects of nasoalveolar molding on nasolabial aesthetics in patients with cleft lip and palate during pre-adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

This study aims to analyze long-term effects of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) as a part of cleft primary management protocols on nasolabial aesthetics for patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Six electronic databases and two journals were searched up to July 2023. Studies comparing nasolabial outcomes between NAM and non-NAM protocols were selected for further analysis. Nasolabial aesthetics were the outcome of interest. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Seven retrospective cohort studies were selected for a qualitative review and four for a quantitative analysis. The risk of bias assessment was moderate for most studies. Only studies utilizing the Asher-McDade rating (AMR) were included for meta-analyses. The protocols with NAM exhibited a significantly lower AMR score for vermillion border than other protocols. AMR scores for nasal form and nasal symmetry from protocols with NAM were significantly lower than protocols without any pre-surgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) but not significantly different from protocols with other PSIO techniques. The AMR score for nasolabial profile from protocols with NAM was not significantly different from other protocols. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that protocol combining NAM and primary rhinoplasty significantly lowered AMR scores for nasal form, nasal symmetry and nasolabial profile. For patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without palate (UCLP), this study found that a protocol combining NAM and primary rhinoplasty improved nasolabial outcomes while a protocol with NAM alone offered only limited benefits. For patients with BCLP, the available evidence remains inconclusive. Performing NAM in combination with primary rhinoplasty improves nasolabial aesthetics in patients with UCLP. PROSPERO (CRD4202128384).

Association between nasal septum deviation and transverse maxillary development: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The few studies investigating the relationship between nasal septum deviation (NSD) and maxillary development, using different assessment methods and the age of subjects, reported contradicting results. METHODS: The association between NSD and transverse maxillary parameters was analyzed using 141 preorthodontic full-skull cone-beam computed tomography scans (mean age, 27.4 ± 9.01 years). Six maxillary, 2 nasal, and 3 dentoalveolar landmarks were measured. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess intrarater and interrater reliability. The correlation between NSD and transverse maxillary parameters was analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Each transverse maxillary parameter was compared among 3 groups of different degrees of severity using the analysis of variance test. Transverse maxillary parameters were also compared between the more and less deviated nasal septum sides using the independent t test. RESULTS: A correlation between deviated septal width and palatal arch depth (r = 0.2, P <0.013) and significant differences in palatal arch depth (P <0.05) among 3 NSD severity groups classified with deviated septal width was noted. There was no correlation between septal deviated angle and transverse maxillary parameters and no significant difference for transverse maxillary parameters among the 3 groups of NSD severity classified by septal deviated angle. No significant difference in transverse maxillary parameters was found when comparing the more and the less deviated sides. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that NSD can affect palatal vault morphology. The magnitude of NSD may be a factor associated with transverse maxillary growth disturbance.