Preoperative Surgical or Endoscopic Bile Duct Drainage in Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pancreatic cancer and obstructive jaundice routinely undergo endoscopic stent placement (ES). It is well known that ES causes bacterial contamination and infectious complications after pancreatic resection. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term outcomes and survival in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection after preoperative ES vs preoperative surgical drainage (SD) via T-tube insertion. METHODS: Patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent SD or ES from 2016 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Outcome analyses included microbiological bile contamination, overall morbidity and assessment of the overall complication burden using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Overall survival was investigated by Kaplan‒Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients with SD were identified and matched with 110 ES patients. After the primary intervention, ES patients experienced more complications (ES: 17.3% vs. SD: 3.6%; P=0.013). The overall complication burden after pancreatic resection was higher in ES patients than in SD patients (CCI: 27.2 vs. 19.9; P=0.022). Additionally, bacterial contamination of the bile was more frequent in ES patients compared to SD individuals (94.3% vs. 7.1%; P<0.001) with similar bacteria in 83.3% of postoperative abdominal infections in ES patients. While overall survival did not differ between the two groups, patients with postinterventional complications after ES had an impaired survival compared to those without complications (11.3 mo vs. 20.4 mo; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: SD for obstructive jaundice in resectable pancreatic cancer is associated with a lower overall complication burden. Additionally, patients with complications after ES experience worse overall survival. These findings indicate to rethink our standards of treatment of obstructive jaundice in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (EUROPA): a randomised controlled stage 2b trial.

Background: Open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) represents the current gold standard of surgical treatment of a wide range of diseases of the pancreatic head but is associated with morbidity in around 40% of cases. Robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is being used increasingly, yet, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of RPD versus OPD have been published, leaving a low level of evidence to support this practice. Methods: This investigator-initiated, exploratory RCT with two parallel study arms was conducted at a high-volume pancreatic centre in line with IDEAL recommendations (stage 2b). Patients scheduled for elective partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for any indication were randomised (1:1) to RPD or OPD with a centralised web-based tool. The primary endpoint was postoperative cumulative morbidity within 90 days, assessed via the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Biometricians were blinded to the intervention, but patients and surgeons were not. The trial was registered prospectively (DRKS00020407). Findings: Between June 3, 2020 and February 14, 2022, 81 patients were randomly assigned to RPD (n = 41) or OPD (n = 40), of whom 62 patients (RPD: n = 29, OPD: n = 33) were analysed in the modified intention to treat analysis. Four patients in the OPD group were randomised, but did not undergo surgery in our department and one patient was excluded in the RPD group due to other reason. Nine patients in the RPD group and 3 patients in the OPD were excluded from the primary analysis because they did not undergo PD, but rather underwent other types of surgery. The CCI after 90 days was comparable between groups (RPD: 34.02 ± 23.48 versus OPD: 36.45 ± 27.65, difference in means [95% CI]: -2.42 [-15.55; 10.71], p = 0.713). The RPD group had a higher incidence of grade B/C pancreas-specific complications compared to the OPD group (17 (58.6%) versus 11 (33.3%); difference in rates [95% CI]: 25.3% [1.2%; 49.4%], p = 0.046). The only complication that occurred significantly more often in the RPD than in the OPD group was clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying. Procedure-related and overall hospital costs were significantly higher and duration of surgery was longer in the RPD group. Blood loss did not differ significantly between groups. The intraoperative conversion rate of RPD was 23%. Overall 90-day mortality was 4.8% without significant differences between RPD and OPD. Interpretation: In the setting of a very high-volume centre, both RPD and OPD can be considered safe techniques. Further confirmatory multicentre RCTs are warranted to uncover potential advantages of RPD in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes. Funding: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF: 01KG2010).

Insulin resistance in Takotsubo syndrome.

AIMS: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute heart failure (AHF) syndrome mimicking the symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Impaired outcome has been shown, making risk stratification and novel therapeutic concepts a necessity. We hypothesized insulin resistance with elevated plasma glucose and potentially myocardial glucose deprivation to contribute to the pathogenesis of TTS and investigated the therapeutic benefit of insulin in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: First, we retrospectively analysed patient data of n = 265 TTS cases (85.7% female, mean age 71.1 ± 14.1 years) with documented initial plasma glucose from the Department of Cardiology of the University Hospital Heidelberg in Germany (May 2011 to May 2021). Median split of the study population according to glucose levels (≤123 mg/dL vs. >123 mg/dL) yielded significantly elevated mean heart rate (80.75 ± 18.96 vs. 90.01 ± 22.19 b.p.m., P < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP, 18.51 ± 8.35 vs. 23.09 ± 7.97 mmHg, P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (26.14 ± 43.30 vs. 46.4 ± 68.6 mg/L, P = 0.006), leukocyte count (10.12 ± 4.29 vs. 15.05 ± 9.83/nL, P < 0.001), peak high-sensitive Troponin T (hs-TnT, 515.44 ± 672.15 vs. 711.40 ± 736.37 pg/mL, P = 0.005), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF, 34.92 ± 8.94 vs. 31.35 ± 8.06%, P < 0.001), and elevated intrahospital mortality (2.3% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.002) in the high-glucose group (Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-squared test). Linear regression indicated a significant association of glucose with HR (P < 0.001), LVEDP (P = 0.014), hs-TnT kinetics from admission to the next day (P < 0.001), hs-TnT the day after admission (P < 0.001), as well as peak hsTnT (P < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed significant association of glucose with a composite intrahospital outcome including catecholamine use, respiratory support, and resuscitation [OR 1.010 (1.004-1.015), P = 0.001]. To further investigate the potential role of glucose in TTS pathophysiology experimentally, we utilized an in vivo murine model of epinephrine (EPI)-driven reversible AHF. For this, male mice underwent therapeutic injection of insulin (INS, 1 IU/kg) or/and glucose (GLU, 0.5 g/kg) after EPI (2.5 mg/kg), both of which markedly improved mean EF (EPI 34.3% vs. EPI + INS + GLU 43.7%, P = 0.025) and significantly blunted mean hs-TnT (EPI 14 393 pg/mL vs. EPI + INS 6864 pg/mL at 24 h, P = 0.039). Particularly, insulin additionally ameliorated myocardial pro-inflammatory gene expression, suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect of acute insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated initial plasma glucose was associated with adverse outcome-relevant parameters in TTS and may present a surrogate parameter of heightened catecholaminergic drive. In mice, insulin- and glucose injection both improved EPI-induced AHF and myocardial damage, indicating insulin resistance rather than detrimental effects of hyperglycaemia itself as the underlying cause. Future studies will investigate the role of HbA1c as a risk stratifier and of insulin-based therapy in TTS.