Novel phospholipolytic activities associated with electronegative low-density lipoprotein are involved in increased self-aggregation.

Electronegative low-density lipoprotein (LDL(-)) is a minor LDL subfraction present in plasma with increased platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) activity. This activity could be involved in the proinflammatory effects of LDL(-). Our aim was to study the presence of additional phospholipolytic activities in LDL(-). Total LDL was fractionated into electropositive (LDL(+)) and LDL(-) by anion-exchange chromatography, and phospholipolytic activities were measured by fluorometric methods. Phospholipolytic activity was absent in LDL(+) whereas LDL(-) presented activity against lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC, 82.4 +/- 34.9 milliunits/mg of apoB), sphingomyelin (SM, 53.3 +/- 22.5 milliunits/mg of apoB), and phosphatidylcholine (PC, 25.7 +/- 4.3 milliunits/mg of apoB). LDL(-), but not LDL(+), presented spontaneous self-aggregation at 37 degrees C in parallel to phospholipid degradation. This was observed in the absence of lipid peroxidation and suggests the involvement of phospholipolytic activity in self-aggregation of LDL(-). Phospholipolytic activity was not due to PAF-AH, apoE, or apoC-III and was not increased in LDL(+) modified by Cu (2+) oxidation, acetylation, or secretory phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2). However, LDL(-) efficiently degraded phospholipids of lipoproteins enriched in LPC, such as oxidized LDL or PLA 2-LDL, but not native or acetylated LDL. This finding supports that LPC is the best substrate for LDL(-)-associated phospholipolytic activity. These results reveal novel properties of LDL(-) that could play a significant role in its atherogenic properties.

Electronegative low-density lipoprotein subfraction from type 2 diabetic subjects is proatherogenic and unrelated to glycemic control.

BACKGROUND: The physicochemical and biological characteristics of electronegative low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (LDL(-)) from type 2 diabetic patients (DM2), before and after insulin therapy, were studied. METHODS: Total LDL was subfractionated in LDL(+) (native LDL) and LDL(-) by anion-exchange chromatography. RESULTS: The proportion of LDL(-) was increased in plasma from DM2 patients compared to control subjects (13.8 +/- 4.6% versus 6.1 +/- 2.5, P < 0.05) and was not modified after glycemic optimization (14.0 +/- 5.9%). LDL(-) from DM2 patients presented similar differential characteristics versus LDL(+) than LDL(-) from controls; that is, decreased apoB and oxidizability, and increased triglyceride, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), apoE, apoC-III, platelet-activating factor (PAF) acetylhydrolase activity and aggregability. No difference in particle size, antioxidants, malondialdehyde (MDA), fructosamine or glycated low-density lipoprotein (gLDL) was observed between LDL subfractions. Concerning differences between LDL subfractions isolated from DM2 and from control subjects, the former showed increased MDA, fructosamine and gLDL proportion and decreased LDL size and antioxidant content. The only effect of glycemic optimization was a decrease in fructosamine and gLDL in LDL(+) from DM2 subjects. LDL(-) from DM2 patients presented low binding affinity to the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) in cultured fibroblasts compared to LDL(+) and two- to threefold increased ability to release interleukin-8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) in endothelial cells. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, although nonenzymatic glycosylation and oxidation are increased in type 2 diabetes, these features would not be directly involved in the generation of LDL(-). Moreover, LDL(-) properties suggest that the high proportion observed in plasma could promote accelerated atherosclerosis in DM2 patients through increased residence time in plasma and induction of inflammatory responses in artery wall cells.

Impaired binding affinity of electronegative low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to the LDL receptor is related to nonesterified fatty acids and lysophosphatidylcholine content.

The binding characteristics of electropositive [LDL(+)] and electronegative LDL [LDL(-)] subfractions to the LDL receptor (LDLr) were studied. Saturation kinetic studies in cultured human fibroblasts demonstrated that LDL(-) from normolipemic (NL) and familial hypercholesterolemic (FH) subjects had lower binding affinity than their respective LDL(+) fractions (P < 0.05), as indicated by higher dissociation constant (K(D)) values. FH-LDL(+) also showed lower binding affinity (P < 0.05) than NL-LDL(+) (K(D), sorted from lower to higher affinity: NL-LDL(-), 33.0 +/- 24.4 nM; FH-LDL(-), 24.4 +/- 7.1 nM; FH-LDL(+), 16.6 +/- 7.0 nM; NL-LDL(+), 10.9 +/- 5.7 nM). These results were confirmed by binding displacement studies. The impaired affinity binding of LDL(-) could be attributed to altered secondary and tertiary structure of apolipoprotein B, but circular dichroism (CD) and tryptophan fluorescence (TrpF) studies revealed no structural differences between LDL(+) and LDL(-). To ascertain the role of increased nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) content in LDL(-), LDL(+) was enriched in NEFA or hydrolyzed with secretory phospholipase A(2). Modification of LDL gradually decreased the affinity to LDLr in parallel to the increasing content of NEFA and/or LPC. Modified LDLs with a NEFA content similar to that of LDL(-) displayed similar affinity. ApoB structure studies of modified LDLs by CD and TrpF showed no difference compared to LDL(+) or LDL(-). Our results indicate that NEFA loading or phospholipase A(2) lipolysis of LDL leads to changes that affect the affinity of LDL to LDLr with no major effect on apoB structure. Impaired affinity to the LDLr shown by LDL(-) is related to NEFA and/or LPC content rather than to structural differences in apolipoprotein B.

Effect of improving glycemic control on low-density lipoprotein particle size in type 2 diabetes.

The current study sought to assess the effect of improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes on the components of diabetic dyslipidemia, especially low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size. A total of 33 type 2 diabetic patients (48.5% women, age 59.6 +/- 11.1 years, body mass index [BMI] 28.9 +/- 4.9, diabetes duration 6 [0 to 40] years, 40.7% on insulin) were seen at the hospital because of poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] 10.33% +/- 1.89%). Triglyceride, LDL-cholesterol (LDLc, Friedewald/ ultracentrifugation), high-density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (HDLc, direct method), apolipoproteins AI (apoAI) and B (apoB) (immunoturbidimetry), and LDL size (gradient gel electrophoresis) were measured at baseline and after improvement in glycemic control (decrease >/= 1 percentage point in HbA(1c) and final HbA(1c)

Postprandial lipidemia is normal in non-obese type 2 diabetic patients with relatively preserved insulin secretion.

To assess postprandial lipidemia in normotriglyceridaemic type 2 diabetic patients treated with diet only, 12 non-obese patients (8 males, hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] 6.80 +/- 0.67%) and 14 controls of similar age, body mass index (BMI), and fasting triglyceride (Tg) were given a test meal (58 g fat, 100,000 IU vitamin A). Fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDLc), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDLc), free fatty acids, and apolipoprotein B (apoB), and fasting and postprandial Tg, retinylpalmitate (RP), LDL size, glucose, and insulin were measured. The homeostasis assessment model (HOMA) index and lipoprotein (Lpl) and hepatic (HL) lipase activities were estimated. Patients showed lower fasting HDLc (1.12 +/- 0.26 v 1.40 +/- 0.28 mmol/L, P =.02) and a trend towards smaller LDL particles, which was significant 4 hours postprandially (25.86 +/- 0.40 v 26.16 +/- 0.30 nm, P =.04). The area under the curve of Tg (AUC-Tg) and RP, and Lpl were similar, but HL was higher in patients (156.63 +/- 23.89 v 118 +/- 43.27 U/L, P =.011). HL correlated inversely with LDL size and directly with the HOMA index. In conclusion, normotriglyceridemic type 2 diabetic patients with insulin resistance but relatively preserved insulin secretion show low fasting HDLc and increased HL, but normal postprandial lipidemia.

Efficacy of atorvastatin and gemfibrozil, alone and in low dose combination, in the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia.

To compare the effects of atorvastatin, gemfibrozil, and their combination on the components of diabetic dyslipidemia, 44 type 2 diabetic patients with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) levels greater than 100 mg/dl and triglyceride levels less than 400 mg/dl were included. Twelve-week treatments with atorvastatin (10-20 mg/d) and gemfibrozil (900-1200 mg/d) were given in random order in an open, cross-over study and then combined (10 mg atorvastatin and 900 mg gemfibrozil) for 12 additional wk. Triglyceride, LDLc, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), non-HDLc, apolipoprotein B (apoB), and LDL size were measured at baseline and after each treatment. Atorvastatin was more effective (P < 0.001) in lowering LDLc, non-HDLc, and apoB and in achieving treatment goals, whereas gemfibrozil lowered triglyceride levels more effectively (P < 0.001) and increased LDL size (from 25.59 +/- 0.06 to 25.69 +/- 0.06 nm; P < 0.05). Combined treatment with both drugs reduced LDLc, triglyceride, non-HDLc, and apoB by 26.5%, 24.1%, 30.4%, and 21.8%, respectively; increased HDLc by 4.8% and LDL size by 0.1 nm; and was the most effective treatment in reaching the therapeutic targets, especially in patients with triglyceride levels higher than 150 mg/dl. In conclusion, statins are first choice drugs in diabetic patients with low to moderate risk LDLc, although their combination with fibrates might be the most appropriate treatment, especially when triglyceride levels are above the therapeutic goal.

Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase is mainly associated with electronegative low-density lipoprotein subfraction.

BACKGROUND: Electronegative LDL [LDL(-)], a modified subfraction of LDL present in plasma, induces the release of interleukin-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 from cultured endothelial cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: We demonstrate that platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) is mainly associated with LDL(-). LDL(-) had 5-fold higher PAF-AH activity than the nonelectronegative LDL subfraction [LDL(+)] in both normolipemic and familial hypercholesterolemic subjects. Western blot analysis after SDS-PAGE confirmed these results, because a single band of 44 kDa corresponding to PAF-AH appeared in LDL(-) but not in LDL(+). Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis demonstrated that PAF-AH was bound to LDL(-) regardless of LDL size. In accordance with the above findings, nonesterified fatty acids, a cleavage product of PAF-AH, were increased in LDL(-) compared with LDL(+). CONCLUSIONS: The high PAF-AH activity observed in LDL(-) could be related to the proinflammatory activity of these lipoproteins toward cultured endothelial cells.

Changes in low-density lipoprotein electronegativity and oxidizability after aerobic exercise are related to the increase in associated non-esterified fatty acids.

The immediate effects of intense aerobic exercise on the composition and oxidizability of low- (LDL) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) were studied in 11 male athletes. Plasma parameters known to affect lipoprotein oxidizability were also evaluated. Lipophilic antioxidants, including alpha-tocopherol and carotenoids, paraoxonase and malondialdehyde (MDA) in plasma remained unchanged after exercise. Increases in the concentration of uric acid, bilirubin and ascorbic acid after the race resulted in a significant increase in total antioxidant serum capacity. LDL, but not HDL, increased its "in vitro"-induced susceptibility to oxidation and the proportion of electronegative LDL (LDL-). The ability of HDL to inhibit the oxidation of LDL remained unchanged after exercise. The enhanced oxidizability of LDL was not explained by increments in its aldehyde content or by decrements in antioxidants. The major compositional change in LDL was an increase in non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) content (from 4.00+/-1.24 to 19.00+/-14.18 mol NEFA/mol apoB). NEFA also increased in plasma and HDL. "In vitro" experiments showed that incubation of LDL with increasing amounts of NEFA induced a concentration-dependent increase in the proportion of LDL-. Moreover, a slightly increased NEFA content in LDL (15-50 mol NEFA/mol apoB) induced higher susceptibility to oxidation. These "in vitro" results concur with those observed in LDL obtained from athletes after exercise, i.e. a concentration of approximately 20 mol NEFA/mol apoB increased LDL oxidizability and LDL- proportion. We conclude that changes in the qualitative characteristics of LDL after exercise were unrelated to oxidative stress, but were related to the increase in LDL-associated NEFA content.