Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Account Res ; 25(1): 1-20, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29140730

RESUMO

International guidelines for the conduct of research with human participants, such as those put forth by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS, 2002), recommend that research review committees account for social risk and benefits to society in their review of proposed research. What do the concepts of the "social" and "society" mean in the context of the review of human participants research? Here we analyze concepts of social and society to define the terms: social harm, social risk, social benefit, and benefits to society. We argue that use of these terms invite more questions than answers and beg for difficult empirical research to determine the nature, likelihood, and magnitude of this category of risk and benefit. Until more research is done and these questions are answered, we advise reviewers to adopt an attitude of provisionalism and caution in their review of specifically "social" risks and benefits and "benefits to society."


Assuntos
Formação de Conceito , Experimentação Humana , Sujeitos da Pesquisa/psicologia , Comportamento Social , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Projetos de Pesquisa , Medição de Risco/métodos , Terminologia como Assunto
3.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 20(1): 77-97, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23579468

RESUMO

While public administration research is thriving because of increased attention to social scientific rigor, lingering problems of methods and ethics remain. This article investigates the reporting of ethics approval within public administration publications. Beginning with an overview of ethics requirements regarding research with human participants, I turn to an examination of human participants protections for public administration research. Next, I present the findings of my analysis of articles published in the top five public administration journals over the period from 2000 to 2012, noting the incidences of ethics approval reporting as well as funding reporting. In explicating the importance of ethics reporting for public administration research, as it relates to replication, reputation, and vulnerable populations, I conclude with recommendations for increasing ethics approval reporting in public administration research.


Assuntos
Políticas Editoriais , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ciências Sociais/ética , Ética em Pesquisa , Humanos , Populações Vulneráveis
4.
Account Res ; 21(2): 85-108, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24228974

RESUMO

Should the exemption from Institutional Review Board (IRB) evaluations currently in place for quality improvements research be extended to public administration research that addresses questions of improving the quality of public service delivery? As a means to both reduce the level of disdain held by a group of social science researchers for IRBs and to reduce the cost of review for minimal risk studies, I argue here that much of the current public administration research should also be exempted from normal processes of review by IRBs on the basis of their similarity to Quality Improvements (QI) research, a category of studies already granted exemption. This argument dovetails provisions currently in place for studies of public service and public benefit, but reframes these exemptions in the language of "quality improvements," which may be a more comfortable language for IRBs concerned to demonstrate compliance for review of all fields. To expedite this argument into the practices of IRBs, I included a checklist that researchers could use to self-identify their studies as QI, not research as such.


Assuntos
Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Administração em Saúde Pública , Melhoria de Qualidade , Ciências Sociais , Estados Unidos
5.
Dev World Bioeth ; 13(3): 125-37, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22994886

RESUMO

In their 2010 article 'Research Integrity in China: Problems and Prospects', Zeng and Resnik challenge others to engage in empirical research on research integrity in China. Here we respond to that call in three ways: first, we provide updates to their analysis of regulations and allegations of scientific misconduct; second, we report on two surveys conducted in Hong Kong that provide empirical backing to describe ways in which problems and prospects that Zeng and Resnik identify are being explored; and third, we continue the discussion started by Zeng and Resnik, pointing to ways in which China's high-profile participation in international academic research presents concerns about research integrity. According to our research, based upon searches of both English and Chinese language literature and policies, and two surveys conducted in Hong Kong, academic faculty and research post-graduate students in Hong Kong are aware of and have a positive attitude towards responsible conduct of research. Although Hong Kong is but one small part of China, we present this research as a response to concerns Zeng and Resnik introduce and as a call for a continued conversation.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Ética em Pesquisa , Pesquisadores/ética , Má Conduta Científica , Percepção Social , Responsabilidade Social , China , Coleta de Dados , Regulamentação Governamental , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hong Kong , Humanos , Má Conduta Científica/ética , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Narrat Inq Bioeth ; 3(1): 1-3, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24406989

RESUMO

This narrative symposium examines the relationship of bioethics practice to personal experiences of illness. A call for stories was developed by Tod Chambers, the symposium editor, and editorial staff and was sent to several commonly used bioethics listservs and posted on the Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics website. The call asked authors to relate a personal story of being ill or caring for a person who is ill, and to describe how this affected how they think about bioethical questions and the practice of medicine. Eighteen individuals were invited to submit full stories based on review of their proposals. Twelve stories are published in this symposium, and six supplemental stories are published online only through Project MUSE. Authors explore themes of vulnerability, suffering, communication, voluntariness, cultural barriers, and flaws in local healthcare systems through stories about their own illnesses or about caring for children, partners, parents and grandparents. Commentary articles by Arthur Frank, Bradley Lewis, and Carol Taylor follow the collection of personal narratives.


Assuntos
Temas Bioéticos , Bioética , Pessoal de Saúde , Narração , Ética Clínica , Humanos , Princípios Morais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...