RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the laryngeal palpatory scale (LPS) to ascertain possible correlation with neck surface electromyography (sEMG). METHODS: Two otolaryngologists and one certified speech-language pathologist assessed 21 participants (seven women and 14 men; with a mean age of 42.8 years; ranged: 21 to 70 years) with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) diagnosed with the current version of the LPS rating system. Consequently, relationships between LPS and objective measures of sEMG were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: The results show that there was a low to moderate between correlations, (statistically positive and significant in 10 correlations among the examined items/states). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, low-moderate positive correlations between sEMG and LPS ratings were found with particular strength for LPS ratings of tightness and ratings made during dynamic tasks. Further investigations can provide useful evidence for researchers and clinicians to document treatment outcomes by using LPS and sEMG in patients with MTD and leading to the more standardized care and improved information about patient progress.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Laryngeal palpation is a routine clinical method for evaluation of patients with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). The aim of this study was to develop a new comprehensive valid and reliable "laryngeal palpatory scale" (LPS), based on psychometric criteria. METHODS: The scale items were selected based on an in-depth analysis of the literature and an expert focus group. Scale item generation and item reduction were followed by a psychometric assessment. Qualitative and quantitative content validity (the content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI)), the qualitative face validity, and the inter-rater reliability were determined. For this purpose, 531 patients were assessed and finally 55 patients with primary MTD (26 women, mean age: 40.8 years, SD: 12.5; 29 male, mean age: 41.6 years, SD: 11.8) participated in the study. A weighted kappa (k*) statistic was used to examine the inter-rater reliability for each single item. RESULTS: Based on the CVR, three items were omitted because they had a score of less than 0.62. The CVI for all remaining items was greater than 0.79 and the scale CVI was equal to 0.96. The final 45 items were a result of the study. The inter-rater reliability for each single item ranged from 0.41 to 1, indicating moderate to almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The LPS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing patients with MTD. However, future studies are needed to provide adequate data on sensitivity, specificity, concurrent validity, and cutoff scores.
