Diffusion de la réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie en France. Étude nationale à grande échelle, à partir des données du PMSI.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of enhanced recovery programs (ERP) implementation in a range of surgical specialties in both the public and private sectors. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study based on hospital stays between March to December 2019. We studied thirteen of the activity segments most frequently included in ERP protocol. The procedures selected included digestive, gynecological, orthopedic, thoracic, and urological procedures. The assessment criteria was the rate of ERP. The results were analyzed first overall and then matching ERP stays to non-ERP stays according to type of institution, patient age and sex, month of discharge, and Charlson comorbidity score. RESULTS: We took 420,031 stays into account, of which 78,119 were coded as ERP. There were 62,403 non-ERP stays. Depending on the type of surgery, the implementation rate ranged from 5 percent to 30 percent. The overall rate of ERP implementation was higher in the private sector (21.2 percent) than in the public sector (14.4 percent). The results are reversed for some surgeries, notably for some cancers. Patients had a higher Charlson score in the public sector. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale national study provides a picture of the degree of diffusion of ERPs in France. Although there are differences between sectors, this diffusion is still insufficient overall. Given the demonstrated benefits of ERPs, more educational efforts are needed to improve their implementation in France.

Impact of enhanced recovery program implementation on postoperative outcomes after liver surgery: a monocentric retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: It is still unclear whether enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) reduce postoperative morbidity after liver surgery. This study investigated the effect on liver surgery outcomes of labeling as a reference center for ERP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perioperative data from 75 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy in our institution after implementation and labeling of our ERP were retrospectively compared to 75 patients managed before ERP. Length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and adherence to protocol were examined. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative data were similar in the two groups. Our ERP resulted in shorter length of stay (3 days [1-6] vs. 4 days [2-7.5], p = 0.03) and fewer postoperative complications (24% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.0067). This reduction in postoperative morbidity can be attributed exclusively to a lower rate of minor complications (Clavien-dindo grade < IIIa), and in particular to a lower rate of postoperative ileus, after labeling. (5.3% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.0019). Other medical and surgical complications were not significantly reduced. Adherence to protocol improved after labeling (17 [16-18] vs. 14 [13-16] items, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a labeled enhanced recovery program for liver surgery was associated with a significant shortening of hospital stay and a halving of postoperative morbidity, mainly ileus.

Impact of preoperative treatment with antidepressants and/or anxiolytics on outcomes after colorectal surgery with an enhanced recovery programme: a monocentric retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative use of antidepressants and anxiolytics was reported to increase length of hospital stay (LOS) and worsen surgical outcomes. However, the surgical procedures studied were seldom performed with an enhanced recovery programme (ERP). This study investigated whether these medications impaired postoperative recovery after colorectal surgery with an ERP. METHODS: The data of all patients scheduled for colorectal surgery between November 2015 and December 2019 prospectively included in our database were analysed. All the patients were managed with the same ERP. Demographic data, risk factors, incidence of postoperative complications, LOS, and adherence to the ERP were compared between patients with and without preoperative antidepressant and/or anxiolytic treatment. RESULTS: Of the 502 patients, 157 (31.3%) were treated with antidepressants and/or anxiolytics. They were older (65.7 vs. 59.5 years, p < 0.001), sicker (higher ASA physical status score, p = 0.001), and underwent surgery more frequently for cancer (73.9 vs. 56.8%, p < 0.001). Overall adherence to ERP (p = 0.99) and adherence to the postoperative items of ERP (p = 0.29), incidence of postoperative complications (35.7 vs. 33.2%, p = 0.61), and LOS (4 [2-7] vs. 4 [2-7], p = 0.99) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that preoperative treatment with antidepressants and/or anxiolytics does not worsen outcome after elective colorectal surgery with an ERP, does not impact adherence to ERP, and does not prolong LOS. ERP seems efficacious in patients treated with these medications, who should therefore not be excluded from this programme.

Exercise Limitation after Critical Versus Mild COVID-19 Infection: A Metabolic Perspective.

Exercise limitation in COVID-19 survivors is poorly explained. In this retrospective study, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was coupled with an oxidative stress assessment in COVID-19 critically ill survivors (ICU group). Thirty-one patients were included in this group. At rest, their oxygen uptake (VO2) was elevated (8 [5.6-9.7] mL/min/kg). The maximum effort was reached at low values of workload and VO2 (66 [40.9-79.2]% and 74.5 [62.6-102.8]% of the respective predicted values). The ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide remained within normal ranges. Their metabolic efficiency was low: 15.2 [12.9-17.8]%. The 50% decrease in VO2 after maximum effort was delayed, at 130 [120-170] s, with a still-high respiratory exchange ratio (1.13 [1-1.2]). The blood myeloperoxidase was elevated (92 [75.5-106.5] ng/mL), and the OSS was altered. The CPET profile of the ICU group was compared with long COVID patients after mid-disease (MLC group) and obese patients (OB group). The MLC patients (n = 23) reached peak workload and predicted VO2 values, but their resting VO2, metabolic efficiency, and recovery profiles were similar to the ICU group to a lesser extent. In the OB group (n = 15), no hypermetabolism at rest was observed. In conclusion, the exercise limitation after a critical COVID-19 bout resulted from an altered metabolic profile in the context of persistent inflammation and oxidative stress. Altered exercise and metabolic profiles were also observed in the MLC group. The contribution of obesity on the physiopathology of exercise limitation after a critical bout of COVID-19 did not seem relevant.

Acute urinary retention and urinary tract infection after short-course urinary drainage in colon or high rectum anastomoses: Post hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective database from the GRACE group.

AIM: The aim was to define the risk factors for acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) in colon or high rectum anastomosis patients based on the absence of a urinary catheter (UC) or the early removal of the UC (<24 h). METHOD: This is a multicentre, international retrospective analysis of a prospective database including all patients undergoing colon or high rectum anastomoses. Patients were part of the enhanced recovery programme audit, developed by the Francophone Group for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery, and were included if no UC was inserted or if a UC was inserted for <24 h. RESULTS: In all, 9389 patients had colon or high rectum anastomoses using laparoscopy, open surgery or robotic surgery. Among these patients, 4048 were excluded because the UC was left in place >24 h (43.1%) and 97 were excluded because the management of UC was unknown (1%). Among the 5244 colon or high rectum anastomoses patients included, AUR occurred in 5.2% and UTI occurred in 0.7%. UCs were in place for <24 h in 2765 patients (52.7%) and 2479 did not have UCs in place (47.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that management of the UC was not significantly associated with the occurrence of AUR and that risk factors for AUR were male gender, ≥65 years old, having an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 and receiving epidural analgesia. Conversely, being of male gender was a protective factor of UTI, while being ≥65 years old, having open surgery and receiving epidural analgesia were risk factors for UTIs. The management of the UC was not significantly associated with the occurrence of UTIs but the occurrence of AUR was a more significant risk factor for UTIs. CONCLUSION: UCs in place for <24 h did not reduce the occurrence of AUR or UTI compared to the absence of UCs.

Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery in Europe: The EuroPOWER international observational study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Assess the relationship between the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) pathway and routine care and 30-day postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: European centers (185 hospitals) across 21 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 2841 adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Each hospital had a 1-month recruitment period between October 2019 and September 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Routine perioperative care. MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-four components of the ERAS pathway were assessed in all patients regardless of whether they were treated in a formal ERAS pathway. A multivariable and multilevel logistic regression model was used to adjust for baseline risk factors, ERAS elements and country-based differences. RESULTS: A total of 1835 patients (65%) received perioperative care at a self-declared ERAS center, 474 (16.7%) developed moderate-to-severe postoperative complications, and 63 patients died (2.2%). There was no difference in the primary outcome between patients who were or were not treated in self-declared ERAS centers (17.1% vs. 16%; OR 1.00; 95%CI, 0.79-1.27; P = 0.986). Hospital stay was shorter among patients treated in self-declared ERAS centers (6 [5-9] vs. 8 [6-10] days; OR 0.82; 95%CI, 0.78-0.87; P < 0.001). Median adherence to 24 ERAS elements was 57% [48%-65%]. Adherence to ERAS-pathway quartiles (≥65% vs. <48%) suggested that patients with the highest adherence rates experienced a lower risk of moderate-to-severe complications (15.9% vs. 17.8%; OR 0.71; 95%CI, 0.53-0.96; P = 0.027), lower risk of death (0.3% vs. 2.9%; OR 0.10; 95%CI, 0.02-0.42; P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6 [4-8] vs. 7 [5-10] days; OR 0.74; 95%CI, 0.69-0.79; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in a self-declared ERAS center does not improve outcome after colorectal surgery. Increased adherence to the ERAS pathway is associated with a significant reduction in overall postoperative complications, lower risk of moderate-to-severe complications, shorter length of hospital stay and lower 30-day mortality.

Pain Characteristics in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Monocentric Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The abdominal pain common in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients is traditionally associated with inflammation but may persist during clinical remission. Central sensitization [CS] has not previously been explored in these patients. This study aimed to determine the epidemiology of pain in IBD patients and to specify pain characteristics with particular attention to CS. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 200 patients; 67% had Crohn's disease [CD]. Pain was assessed using the McGill questionnaire, using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4] questionnaire and by clinical examination. Its impacts on quality of life, depression and anxiety were also assessed. RESULTS: Three-quarters of IBD patients complained of pain, including intermittent pain attacks, 62% reported abdominal pain and 17.5% had CS. The prevalence of pain [83.6% vs 59.1%; p < 0.001] and abdominal pain [68.7% vs 48.5%; p = 0.006] was higher in CD patients than in ulcerative colitis [UC] patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age [p = 0.02], sex [female] [p = 0.004] and CD [p = 0.005] were independent risk factors for pain. Pain intensity was greater in the case of CS (6 [5-3] vs 3 [1.5-5], p < 0.003) which significantly impaired quality of life [p < 0.003] compared with pain without CS. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pain was high in IBD patients [≈75%] and higher in CD patients. Significant impacts on quality of life were confirmed. More than 25% of patients with abdominal pain described CS as responsible for more severe pain and worsened quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION REF: NCT04488146.

The impact of orthostatic intolerance on early ambulation following abdominal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of orthostatic intolerance on the day of surgery is more than 50% after abdominal surgery. The impact of orthostatic intolerance on ambulation on the day of surgery has been little studied. We investigated orthostatic intolerance and walking ability after colorectal and bariatric surgery in an enhanced recovery programme. METHODS: Eighty-two patients (colorectal: n = 46, bariatric n = 36) were included and analysed in this prospective study. Walk tests for 2 min (2-MWT) and 6 min (6-MWT) were performed before and 24 h after surgery, and 3 h after surgery for 2-MWT. Orthostatic intolerance characterised by presyncopal symptoms when rising was recorded at the same time points. Multivariate binary logistic regressions modelling the probability of orthostatic intolerance and walking inability were performed taking into account potential risk factors. RESULTS: Prevalence of orthostatic intolerance and walking inability was, respectively, 65% and 18% 3-hour after surgery. The day after surgery, patients' performance had greatly improved: approximately 20% of the patients experienced orthostatic intolerance, whilst only 5% of the patients were unable to walk. Adjusted binary logistic regressions demonstrated that age (p = .37), sex (p = .39), BMI (p = .74), duration of anaesthesia (p = .71) and type of surgery (p = .71) did not significantly influence walking ability. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that orthostatic intolerance was frequent (~ 60%) 3-hour after abdominal surgery but prevented a 2-MWT only in ~20% of patients. No risk factors for orthostatic intolerance and walking inability were evidenced.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Survivors: Evidence of a Sustained Exercise Intolerance and Hypermetabolism.

To investigate exercise capacity at 3 and 6 months after a prolonged ICU stay. DESIGN: Observational monocentric study. SETTING: A post-ICU follow-up clinic in a tertiary university hospital in Liège, Belgium. PATIENTS: Patients surviving an ICU stay greater than or equal to 7 days for a severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and attending our post-ICU follow-up clinic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary and metabolic variables provided by a cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer were collected at rest, at peak exercise, and during recovery. Fourteen patients (10 males, 59 yr [52-62 yr], all obese with body mass index > 27 kg/m2) were included after a hospital stay of 40 days (35-53 d). At rest, respiratory quotient was abnormally high at both 3 and 6 months (0.9 [0.83-0.96] and 0.94 [0.86-0.97], respectively). Oxygen uptake was also abnormally increased at 3 months (8.24 mL/min/kg [5.38-10.54 mL/min/kg]) but significantly decreased at 6 months (p = 0.013). At 3 months, at the maximum workload (67% [55-89%] of predicted workload), oxygen uptake peaked at 81% (64-104%) of predicted maximum oxygen uptake, with oxygen pulse and heart rate reaching respectively 110% (76-140%) and 71% (64-81%) of predicted maximum values. Ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide remains within normal ranges. The 50% decrease in oxygen uptake after maximum effort was delayed, at 130 seconds (115-142 s). Recovery was incomplete with a persistent anaerobic metabolism. At 6 months, no significant improvement was observed, excepting an increase in heart rate reaching 79% (72-95%) (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged reduced exercise capacity was observed up to 6 months in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 survivors. This disability did not result from residual pulmonary or cardiac dysfunction but rather from a metabolic disorder characterized by a sustained hypermetabolism and an impaired oxygen utilization.

Impact of Preoperative Anemia on Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery Program After Colorectal Surgery: A Monocentric Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is common before major abdominal surgery (35%). It is an independent factor for postoperative complications and longer length of stay (LOS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which preoperative anemia impacts on enhanced recovery programs (ERP) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data for patients scheduled for colorectal surgery between 2015 and 2019, were analyzed (n = 494). All patients were managed with the same ERP. Demographic data, preoperative risk factors, postoperative complications, LOS and adherence to ERP were compared between anemic and non-anemic patients. Anemia was defined by a hemoglobin concentration < 13 g dL-1 in men and < 12 g dL-1 in women. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In total, 173 patients had preoperative anemia. They were older (p < 0.001) and more often male (p = 0.02). The following risk factors were significantly more frequent in the anemic group: renal failure (p = 0.04), malnutrition (p < 0.001), cardiac arrhythmia (p < 0.001), coronaropathy (p = 0.02) and anticoagulant treatment (p < 0.001). Despite more risk factors, anemic patients did not experience more postoperative complications (38.2% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.12). Overall adherence to ERP was similar (18 [16-19] vs. 18 [17-19], p = 0.06). LOS was 4 [3-7] and 3 [2-6.25] days in the anemic and the non-anemic groups, respectively (p < 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that anemia did not affect LOS (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that preoperative anemia does not detract from the benefits of ERP after elective colorectal surgery.

Impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the efficiency of enhanced recovery programmes after colorectal surgery: a retrospective study of the GRACE database.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia is considered a key element of enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) after colorectal surgery. We investigated the effects of NSAIDs, a major component of multimodal analgesia on adherence to ERP, incidence of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the GRACE database that included 8611 patients scheduled for colorectal surgery with an ERP between February 2016 and November 2019. Primary endpoints were adherence to the postoperative protocol, the rate and type of postoperative complications, and LOS. Data are median [IQR] and number (per cent). Multivariate models were used to assess the effects of NSAIDs on these variables taking into account potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Data from 8258 patients were analysed and classified into four groups according to whether NSAIDs had been given intra- and/or postoperatively or not at all; 4578 patients were given NSAIDs intra- and/or postoperatively and 3680 patients received no NSAIDs. Use of NSAIDs was significantly (P<0.001) associated with improved adherence to the postoperative protocol (4.0 [3.0-4.0] vs. 3.0 [2.0-4.0] items), a reduced incidence of complications (21.1% vs. 29.2%), and a shortened LOS (5.0 [3.0-7.0] vs. 6.0 [4.0-9.0] days) compared to the no-NSAIDs group. Multivariate analyses adjusted for the confounding factors confirmed a significant (P<0.001) beneficial impact of NSAIDs on these three primary endpoints. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that perioperative NSAID use results in better adherence to the postoperative protocol, fewer postoperative in-hospital complications, and shorter LOS after colorectal surgery.

Comparison of outcome after right colectomy with an enhanced recovery programme in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and patients operated on for other conditions: a monocentric retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) after surgery reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often present risk factors for postoperative complications. This accounts for reluctance to include them in ERPs. We compared outcome after right colectomy with an ERP in IBD and non-IBD patients. METHODS: In our GRACE colorectal surgery database comprising 508 patients, we analysed patients scheduled for right colectomy (n = 160). Adherence to the protocol, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay of IBD patients (n = 45) were compared with those of non-IBD patients (n = 115). Data (mean ± SD, median [IQR], count (%)) were compared by Student's t, Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests when appropriate; p < 0.05 taken as statistically significant. RESULTS: IBD patients were significantly younger (38.9 ± 13.8 vs. 58.9 ± 18.5 years, p < 0.001) and had lower BMI (23.0 ± 5.0 vs. 25.1 ± 5.0 kg m-2, p < 0.01). Adherence to ERP was similar in the two groups. Resumption of eating on the day of the operation was less well tolerated (73.3% vs. 85.2%, p < 0.05) and postoperative pain (p < 0.001) was greater in IBD patients. The incidence of postoperative complications (13.3% vs. 17.3%) and the length of hospital stay (3 [3-4.5] vs. 3 [2-5] days) were comparable in IBD and non-IBD patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The management of IBD patients in an ERP is not only feasible but also indicated. These patients benefit as much from ERP as non-IBD patients.

Energy and Protein Intake After Return Home in Colorectal Surgery Patients With an Enhanced Recovery Program: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients scheduled for colorectal surgery with an enhanced recovery program (ERP), feeding after returning home has been insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to measure energy and protein intake during the first month at home. METHODS: Seventy adult patients scheduled for colorectal surgery with ERP were included. Calorie and protein intakes were calculated, and body weight was measured preoperatively and 3, 7, 15, and 30 days after discharge home. Data are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were age 60.0 ± 15.0 years, BMI = 25.9 ± 5.5 kg/m2 , and colon/rectum of 56/14. The duration of hospitalization was 3 (2-5) days. Calorie and protein intakes (21.9 [17.7-28.6] kilocalorie per kilogram of ideal body weight [kcal/kg IBW] and 0.81 [0.61-1.14] g/kg IBW) were significantly reduced (P < .01) by 15% on day 3, compared with preoperative values, and then increased gradually to reach preoperative values after 1 month. Almost 50% of the patients failed to reach the calorie intake target of 25 kcal/kg IBW, and almost no patient reached the protein intake target of 1.5 g/kg IBW 30 days after discharge home. Weight loss after 30 days at home remained at -1.8 ± 2.7 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgery, even in an ERP, is associated with energy and protein intake below the targets recommended for the rehabilitation phase and results in weight loss. Whether nutrition counseling and prolonged administration of protein-enriched oral supplements could accelerate weight gain needs to be explored.

Quadriceps strength in intensive care unit survivors: Variability and influence of preadmission physical activity.

BACKGROUND: Muscle weakness is common in patients who survive a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Quadriceps strength (QS) measurement allows evaluation of lower limb performances that are associated with mobility outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to characterise the range of QS in ICU survivors (ICUS) during their short-term evolution, by comparing them with surgical patients without critical illness and with healthy participants. The secondary aim was to explore whether physical activity before ICU admission influenced QS during that trajectory. METHODS: Patients with length of ICU stay ≥2 days, adults scheduled for elective colorectal surgery, and young healthy volunteers were included. Maximal isometric QS was assessed using a handheld dynamometer and a previously validated standardised protocol. The dominant leg was tested in the supine position. ICUSs were tested in the ICU and 1 month after ICU discharge, while surgical patients were tested before and on the day after surgery, as well as 1 month after discharge. Healthy patients were tested once only. Patients were classified as physically inactive or active before admission from the self-report. RESULTS: Thirty-eight, 32, and 34 participants were included in the ICU, surgical, and healthy groups, respectively. Demographic data were similar in the ICUS and surgical groups. In the ICU, QS was lower in the ICU group than in the surgical and healthy groups (3.01 [1.88-3.48], 3.38 [2.84-4.37], and 5.5 [4.75-6.05] N/kg, respectively). QS did not significantly improve 1 month after ICU discharge, excepted in survivors who were previously physically active (22/38, 56%): the difference between the two time points was -6.6 [-27.1 to -1.7]% vs 20.4 [-3.4 to 43.3]%, respectively, in physically inactive and active patients (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who survived an ICU stay were weaker than surgical patients. However, a huge QS heterogeneity was observed among them. Their QS did not improve during the month after ICU discharge. Physically inactive patients should be early identified as at risk of poorer recovery.