Amount drained at ultrasound-guided thoracentesis and risk of pneumothorax.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that no upper limit of the fluid amount drained is necessary when performing ultrasound-guided thoracentesis, but the risk of pneumothorax when large amounts of fluid are drained has not been studied in detail. PURPOSE: To study the amount of drained fluid at ultrasound-guided thoracentesis and the subsequent risk of pneumothorax. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospectively collected information on all ultrasound-guided thoracenteses performed at a county hospital between 2004 and 2006 was evaluated. In total, 735 thoracenteses in 471 patients were included. Chest radiographs performed within 14 days after thoracentesis were identified to obtain cases of pneumothorax and cases treated with tube thoracostomy. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. The study was approved by the regional research ethics committee. RESULTS: There was a steep increase in risk for pneumothorax when large amounts of fluid were drained. Compared to a thoracentesis of 0.8-1.2 l, drainage of 1.8-2.2 l was associated with a more than threefold increase in risk for pneumothorax (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-11.2), and after drainage of 2.3 l or more, the increase in risk was almost sixfold (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.30-24.7). The association between the amount drained and the risk of pneumothorax was even more pronounced for pneumothoraces requiring tube thoracostomy (P for trend <0.0001). Nine of 11 tube thoracostomies occurred after thoracenteses of 1.8 l or more. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that drainage of large amounts of fluid at ultrasound-guided thoracentesis is a risk factor for pneumothorax.

Outcome of younger patients with acute diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy over whether patients presenting with a primary attack of acute diverticulitis at a younger age are more prone to complications and recurrence than older patients. METHODS: A review, including postal questionnaires, was undertaken of 234 patients who had a primary episode of acute diverticulitis. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) and/or pathology report. The mean length of follow-up was 30 (range 16-45) months. RESULTS: In 58 patients aged 50 years or less no differences in fever or white blood cell count were found in comparison with findings in 176 patients aged above 50 years. The rate of severe diverticulitis observed with CT was lower in the younger patients (2 versus 11.9 per cent; P = 0.025). Surgical management during the first admission was undertaken less commonly in younger patients (2 versus 6.8 per cent; P = 0.271). Rates of subsequent events (recurrent diverticulitis and/or further surgery) during follow-up were higher in younger patients (25 versus 19.5 per cent), but this was not significant (P = 0.423). A type II error cannot be excluded. CONCLUSION: First episodes of acute diverticulitis were not more aggressive in patients aged 50 years or less. Recurrence rates were slightly higher than in older patients.

CT colonography versus colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis - a prospective, comparative study.

AIM: To assess whether computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a viable alternative to colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CTC followed immediately by colonoscopy. Results were blinded to the examiners. Findings of diverticular disease and patient acceptance were evaluated. RESULTS: Bowel preparation and distension were good in the majority of CTC and colonoscopy examinations. Diverticular disease was found in 96% of patients at CTC and in 90% at colonoscopy. The rate of agreement between CTC and colonoscopy for diverticular findings in the sigmoid colon was good (kappa=0.64). No complications were seen. Patients found colonoscopy more uncomfortable (p<0.03), more painful (p<0.001), and more difficult (p<0.01) than CTC. Of the patients favouring one examination, 74% preferred CTC. CONCLUSION: CTC appears to have a better diagnostic potential for imaging of diverticular disease-specific findings, when compared with colonoscopy. Also, CTC was less uncomfortable and was preferred by a majority of patients. CTC seems to be a reasonable alternative in follow-up of patients with symptomatic diverticular disease.

Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Body mass index as selection factor for US examination.

PURPOSE: Acute appendicitis is often difficult to diagnose and a negative laparotomy rate of about 25% is common. At Danderyd Hospital we started routine US in these patients, the aim being to estimate the sensitivity and the specificity for US when compared with the body mass index (BMI) of the patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patient records were examined: During a period of 6 months 142 patients over 14 years of age were investigated with US. Their height and weight were noted and the BMI was calculated. RESULTS: The sensitivity for US examination was 0.76 in patients with a BMI < 25 but only 0.37 in patients with BMI > or = 25. This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: US is a good method for examination of patients with BMI less than 25 but not in patients with BMI over 25.

Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis, and their value to the clinician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The negative appendectomy rate and the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis. RESULT: The diagnostic accuracy was 88% (men 95%, women 80%). Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were examined by ultrasonography preoperatively. The sensitivity for ultrasonography was 0.82 and the specificity was 0.97. Forty-nine patients were examined by computed tomography preoperatively. The sensitivity for computer tomography was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ultrasound and computed tomography investigations on patients with suspected appendicitis are of great value. Computed tomography seems to have a higher sensitivity than ultrasound and a high specificity. In fertile women, where unnecessary surgery is best avoided, we believe that computed tomography investigation or ultrasound examination are better alternatives to surgical intervention.

[A high degree of accuracy is possible in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Laboratory tests, ultrasonography and computerized tomography are of great value]. / Hög träffsäkerhet kan uppnås vid appendicitdiagnostik. Laboratorieprov, ultraljudsundersökning och datortomografi är av stort värde.

Although acute appendicitis is often difficult to diagnose and negative laparotomy rates of 25 per cent are common, several options are currently available for the preoperative work-up. Careful history taking and physical examination are essential, together with analysis of inflammatory variables (C-reactive protein and white cell count). After admission, additional help is available in the form of ultrasonography and computerised tomography (CT), ultrasonography apparently being best in slender and normal weight patients (body mass indices < 25) and CT in overweight patients. The article reports how, without using invasive laparoscopy, a negative laparotomy rate of 7.2 per cent (11% in women and 4% in men) was obtained in 1998 at a hospital serving a population of 330,000.