Single incision glove port laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

INTRODUCTION: The advantages of single port surgery remain controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single incision glove port colon resections using a diathermy hook, reusable ports and standard laparoscopic straight instrumentation. METHODS: Between June 2012 and February 2014, 70 consecutive patients (30 women) underwent a colonic resection using a wound retractor and glove port. Forty patients underwent a right hemicolectomy through the umbilicus and thirty underwent attempted single port resection via an incision in the right rectus sheath (14 high anterior resection, 13 low anterior resection, 3 abdominoperineal resection). RESULTS: Sixty-two procedures (89%) were completed without conversion to open or multiport techniques. Four procedures had to be converted and additional ports were needed in four other patients. The postoperative mortality rate was 0%. Complications occurred in six patients (9%). Two cases were R1 while the remainder were R0 with a median nodal harvest of 20 (range: 9-48). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range: 3-25 days) (right hemicolectomy: 5 days (range: 3-12 days), left sided resection: 6 days (range: 4-25 days). At a median follow-up of 14 months, no port site hernias were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Single incision glove port surgery is an appropriate technique for different colorectal cancer resections and has the advantage of being less expensive than surgery with commercial single incision ports.

Congenital diverticular disease of the entire colon.

Congenital or true colonic diverticulosis is a rare condition typified by the preservation of the colonic wall architecture within the diverticular outpouching. Cases of multiple jejunal diverticula have been reported as well as cases of solitary giant diverticula of the colon. There have been no reports in the literature of pancolonic congenital diverticulosis.

Management of iatrogenic recto-urethral fistula by transanal rectal flap advancement.

AIM: Recto-urethral fistulas are an uncommon, but devastating complication following rectal or urinary tract surgery. Repair is often difficult, and the optimal approach is unclear. We report our recent experience using an endorectal advancement flap. METHOD: A case note review of all patients undergoing repair of recto-urethral fistula in our institution was undertaken. Data on aetiology of the fistula, patient demographics, operative procedure and outcome both clinically and radiologically were extracted. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2008, six transanal rectal advancement flaps in five patients were carried out. Four had undergone a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, without any radiotherapy. Two types of fistula (type 1 associated with severe intra-abdominal sepsis and type 2 associated with localized sepsis) were found, with faecal diversion being less likely with the latter. Four (80%) patients underwent successful primary repair, with one patient requiring a second procedure. Postoperative cystography confirmed closure of the fistula in all five patients, and no recurrence has been observed at a mean follow-up time of 11 months. CONCLUSION: Rectal advancement flap is a simple, effective technique for iatrogenic recto-urethral fistula with minimal morbidity.