RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Internal polymerase III promoters in retroviral vectors have been used extensively to express short RNA sequences, such as ribozymes, RNA aptamers or short interfering RNA inhibitors, in various positions and orientations. However, the stability of these promoters in the reverse orientation has not been rigorously evaluated. RESULTS: A series of retroviral vectors was generated carrying the U6+1 promoter with 3 different HIV-1 RT-specific RNA aptamers and one control aptamer, all in the reverse orientation. After shuttle packaging, the CD4+ cell line CEMx174 was transduced with each vector, selected for expression of GFP, and challenged with HIV-1. We did not observe inhibition of HIV-1 replication in these transduced populations. PCR amplification of the U6+1 promoter-RNA aptamer inhibitor cassette from transduced CEMx174 cells and RT-PCR amplification from transfected Phoenix (amphotropic) packaging cells showed two distinct products: a full-length product of the expected size as well as a truncated product. The sequence of the full-length PCR product was identical to the predicted amplicon sequence. However, sequencing of the truncated product revealed a 139 bp deletion in the U6 promoter. This deletion decreased transcriptional activity of the U6 promoter. Analysis of the deleted sequences from the U6 promoter in the antisense direction indicated consensus splice donor, splice acceptor and branch point sequences. CONCLUSION: The existence of a cryptic splice site in the U6 promoter when expressed in a retroviral vector in the reverse orientation generates deletions during packaging and may limit the utility of this promoter for expression of small RNA inhibitors.
RESUMO
RNA molecules can be powerful inhibitors of HIV-1 replication. To determine the relative efficacy of siRNAs and RNA aptamers, a direct comparison of three anti-HIV reverse transcriptase aptamers and three shRNAs targeted to HIV-1(R3b) was made. U6 promoter-driven anti-HIV genes were delivered into CEMx174 cells via a retroviral vector, and transduced cells were sorted out via green fluorescent protein function and challenged with HIV. The results show that, at low virus input, shRNAs can block HIV as efficiently as aptamers. When expressed in target cells, both classes of inhibitors blocked early events of reverse transcription, suggesting they are both able to access intracellular reverse transcription complexes. However, at higher multiplicities of infection (m.o.i. of 50), while the aptamers could efficiently inhibit HIV replication, shRNAs did not. RNase protection assays indicated similar steady-state levels or nucleocytoplasmic distribution showing that the differential efficacy was not a reflection of intracellular concentration. The higher potency of anti-RT aptamers could be due to their ability to inhibit two successive rounds of reverse transcription owing to their unique ability to be encapsidated into virion particles. Furthermore, anti-RT aptamers expressed in T cells afforded protection against high-dose infection by chimeric RT-SHIV viruses.
