A Comparative Analysis of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, Cervical Cytology, and Histopathology in the Screening and Early Detection of Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of the Cervix.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cervical cancer and related mortality is growing worldwide. The natural history of disease progression ranges from 10 to 20 years. Hence, effective screening can help in the early detection and prevention of fatal complications. This study aims to (1) compare the sociodemographic characteristics of the women with malignant and premalignant lesions of the cervix, (2) collate the accuracy of visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) with Pap smear cervical cytology in the early detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix, and (3) standardize it with histopathology, a gold standard screening tool. METHODS: This study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, India, from October 2020 to March 2021 including all the sexually active women of the reproductive age group and postmenopausal women attending the gynecology outpatient department and the indoor admitted patients. A total of 500 patients were included in the study. The women were subjected to a Pap smear followed by VIA. Punch biopsy was taken from the acetowhite regions and sent for histopathological examination. The women with abnormal cervical cytology results also underwent a biopsy and histopathological examination. RESULTS: On comparative analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of Pap smear cytology were found to be 89.5% and 65.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of VIA were found to be 94.7% and 88%, respectively. The overall accuracy of VIA testing (93.2%) is more significant than that of Pap smear (68%). CONCLUSION: According to our study, it is found that visual inspection with acetic acid is more diagnostically accurate than Pap smear cytology. Hence, VIA testing could be implemented as a primary screening tool with credence. Also, as learned from our study, the premalignant and malignant lesions are more common among elderly women living under a low socioeconomic status. Hence, these groups of women must be outreached and covered through effectively targeted screening programs.

Prevalence of non A to E hepatitis in Mumbai, India.

INTRODUCTION: Acute viral hepatitis is a common problem in India. World wide data shows that 5 to 20 percent of this is caused by non A-E hepatitis. There is no data in India regarding non A-E hepatitis. We carried out this study to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors and outcome of non A-E hepatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this single centre study, we evaluated all patients admitted with features of acute viral hepatitis at our hospital between the period of February to July 2015. A detailed history about the epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features was done. Patients were evaluated with bilirubin, transaminases and prothrombin time. Each patient was investigated for IgM HAV, IgM HEV, HBsAg and Antibody against hepatitis C. Patients turning out negative were investigated for presence of autoimmune hepatitis or Wilson's disease. All viral markers were repeated a week later to confirm non A-E status. RESULTS: A total 265 patients were included of which 41 (15.4%) patients were non A-E hepatitis. They had higher age (28.55 vs 34.99, p<0.05) but similar gender and sub urban location. Median SEC classification was A2 in hepatitis A/E group as compared to A3 in non A-E group. The duration of symptoms and clinical features between the two groups were similar with Anorexia, Malasie, Nausea/vomiting being most common. The risk factors between the two groups were similar. The bilirubin and transaminases were non significantly lower than hepatitis A/E patients while albumin levels were significantly lower. The outcomes of both groups were similar with no mortality or fulminant hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Non A-E hepatitis patients tends to be older, lower SEC class and had lower albumin levels as compared to hepatitis A/E.

Prevalence of non A to E hepatitis in Mumbai, India / Prevalencia de la hepatitis no A /E en Mumbai, India

Introduction: Acute viral hepatitis is a common problem in India. World wide data shows that 5 to 20 percent of this is caused by non A-E hepatitis. There is no data in India regarding non A-E hepatitis. We carried out this study to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors and outcome of non A-E hepatitis. Material and methods: In this single centre study, we evaluated all patients admitted with features of acute viral hepatitis at our hospital between the period of February to July 2015. A detailed history about the epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features was done. Patients were evaluated with bilirubin, transaminases and prothrombin time. Each patient was investigated for IgM HAV, IgM HEV, HBsAg and Antibody against hepatitis C. Patients turning out negative were investigated for presence of autoimmune hepatitis or Wilson's disease. All viral markers were repeated a week later to confirm non A-E status. Results: A total 265 patients were included of which 41 (15.4%) patients were non A-E hepatitis. They had higher age (28.55 vs 34.99, p<0.05) but similar gender and sub urban location. Median SEC classification was A2 in hepatitis A/E group as compared to A3 in non A-E group. The duration of symptoms and clinical features between the two groups were similar with Anorexia, Malasie, Nausea/vomiting being most common. The risk factors between the two groups were similar. The bilirubin and transaminases were non significantly lower than hepatitis A/E patients while albumin levels were significantly lower. The outcomes of both groups were similar with no mortality or fulminant hepatitis. Conclusion: Non A-E hepatitis patients tends to be older, lower SEC class and had lower albumin levels as compared to hepatitis A/E

Introdución: La hepatitis viral aguda es un problema común en la India. Los datos mundiales indican que el 5 al 20% es causada por hepatitis no A-E. No hay datos en la India sobre hepatitis no A-E. Objetivo: Se realiza este estudio para evaluar la epidemiología, clínica, factores de riesgo y pronóstico de la hepatitis no A-E. Material y métodos: En este estudio de un solo centro evaluamos a todos los pacientes que se admitieron con clínica de hepatitis viral aguda en nuestro hospital en el periodo de febrero a julio del 2015. Se realizó una historia detallada para evaluar la epidemiología, características clínicas. Se les tomó bilirrubinas, transaminasas y tiempo de protrombina. A cada paciente se le realizó HAV IgM, HEV IgM, HbsAg y anticuerpo anti hepatitis C. Los que fueron negativos se les estudió para hepatitis autoinmune y enfermedad de Wilson. Todos los marcadores virales se repitieron a la semana para confirmar hepatitis no A-E. Resultados: Se incluyeron 256 pacientes, 41 de ellos (15,4%) fueron hepatitis no A-E. Tuvieron más edad (28,55 vs 34,99, p<0,05), pero el mismo género y ubicación urbana. La clasificación media SEC fue A2 en el grupo hepatitis A/E, comparada con 3 en el grupo de no A-E. La duración de los síntomas y el desarrollo clínico fue similar en ambos grupos, siendo la anorexia el malestar general, las náuseas y los vómitos los más frecuentes. El factor de riesgo fue similar, al igual que las transaminasas, mientras que la albúmina fue significativamente menor. El resultado fue similar sin caso alguno de hepatitis fulminante. Conclusión: Los pacientes con hepatitis no A-E tienden a ser mayores, de clase SEC más baja y con valores de albumina más bajos que los pacientes con hepatitis A-E