Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: perioperative results and long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic colon resection in the management of colon cancer is unclear. The aims of this study were to compare perioperative results and long-term outcomes in patients randomized to either open (O) or laparoscopically assisted (LA) colon resection for colon cancer. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial comparing O to LA colon resection was conducted from January 1993 to November 1995. Preoperative workup, intraoperative results, complications, length of stay, pathologic findings, and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with t-test. Follow-up periods ranged from 3.5 to 6.3 years (mean, 4.9 years). RESULTS: No port-site or abdominal wall recurrences were noted in any patients. [table: see text] CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that laparoscopically assisted colon resection for malignant disease can be performed safely, with morbidity, mortality, and en bloc resections comparable with those of open laparotomy. Long-term (5-year) follow-up assessment shows similar outcomes in both groups of patients, demonstrating definite perioperative advantages with LA surgery and no perioperative or long-term disadvantages.

Laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication has become the criterion standard for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Recently, several patients were referred with recurrent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease or severe dysphagia following previous antireflux surgery for possible laparoscopic reoperation. HYPOTHESIS: To determine the safety and efficacy of this procedure. DESIGN: Case series, consecutive sample. SETTING: University-affiliated and community tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: Prospective study of 27 consecutive patients undergoing attempted laparoscopic reoperation for symptoms of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease or intractable dysphagia following antireflux surgery. Patients were available for follow-up for 1 to 60 months postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent preoperative workup and attempted laparoscopic reoperation for treatment of symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected on preoperative symptoms and evaluation, operative time, blood loss, time to regular diet, length of hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, and long-term results. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent successful laparoscopic operations, with no mortality and minimal morbidity. One patient underwent conversion to open laparotomy and then developed a proximal gastric leak, which was treated conservatively. Twenty-four patients began a liquid diet by postoperative day 1, and most were discharged from the hospital by postoperative day 3. One patient required dilation for postoperative dysphagia. The remaining patients are doing well and none have required treatment with acid-reducing medication. CONCLUSIONS: Although technically challenging, laparoscopic reoperation for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease can be performed safely and with excellent results. In the hands of experienced endoscopic surgeons, patients who have undergone unsuccessful antireflux surgery should be offered laparoscopic reoperation.

An experimental teaching model for laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy.

For advanced laparoscopic procedures, team collaboration and good suturing skills are only two of many requirements to achieve success. Teaching opportunities are mandatory to allow general surgeons to become acquainted with advanced procedures and to gain confidence in new laparoscopic procedures. In this teaching model presented herein, the technical difficulties and operative steps of a laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy and drainage via Roux-en-Y-loop are outlined as performed on eight pigs weighing about 35 kg each (range, 31.2-41.2) with nondistended common bile ducts (5.6 mm; range, 4.2-6.3). Functionality of the bypass was assessed by a weekly monitoring of bilirubin levels and a contrast material injection into the gallbladder after a 4-month follow-up with measurements of the common bile duct (9.8 mm; range, 7.2-15.2) and the diameter of the choledochojejunostomy (5.0 mm; range, 3.6-6.2) at necropsy. This model provides outstanding conditions for teaching laparoscopic suture techniques to be applied in advanced laparoscopy and demonstrates the feasibility of laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy within a reasonable operation time (122 min; range, 105-155).

Laparoscopy during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery with that of open laparotomy in pregnant patients. DESIGN: Six-year case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary care, university and community hospitals. PATIENTS: Population-based sample. From 1990 through 1995, 16 pregnant patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (study group) and 18 underwent open laparotomy (control group) during the first or second trimester. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to 6 years. INTERVENTION: In the study group, 4 patients underwent appendectomies and 12 underwent cholecystectomies. The control group included 7 appendectomies and 11 cholecystectomies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 2 groups were compared for age, trimester, surgical time, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, return of gastrointestinal tract function, duration of intravenous or intramuscular narcotics, postoperative stay, gestational age of delivery, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, birth weights, and complications. RESULTS: Age, trimester, oxygenation, end-tidal CO2, gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, and birth weights were not different between the 2 groups. The patients who underwent laparoscopy had significantly longer operative times 82 vs 49 minutes), shorter stay (1.5 vs 2.8 days), earlier resumption of regular diet (1.0 vs 2.4 days), and shorter duration of intravenous or intramuscular narcotics (1.2 vs 2.6 days) (all P < .01). Four complications were found in the laparotomy group vs 6 in the laparoscopy group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery in pregnant women significantly decrease hospitalization, decreases narcotic use, and quickens return to a regular diet when compared with open laparotomy in pregnant women. No significant differences between the 2 groups in perioperative morbidity or mortality were present. These data suggest that therapeutic laparoscopy during pregnancy in the first or second trimester is safe.

Central venous catheterization via persistent left superior vena cava.

We describe the problems of clinical assessment of subclavian catheter placement whose course was noted to be along the left lateral border of the heart, suggesting malposition. After the catheter's position in a persistent left superior vena cava was confirmed by blood gas analysis, lateral chest X-ray film, and venography, the catheter was used to provide total parenteral nutrition without complications. The evaluation and workup of seeming malposition of central venous catheters and the embryologic development of a left-sided vena cava are discussed.