A quantitative study of hydration level of the skin surface and erythema on conventional and microclimate management capable mattresses and hospital beds.

BACKGROUND: In addition to pressure itself, microclimate factors are gaining more attention in the understanding of the development of pressure ulcers. While there are already various products to reduce pressure on sore-prone areas to prevent pressure ulcers, there are only a few mattresses/hospital beds that actively influence skin microclimate. In this study, we investigated if microclimate management capable mattresses/hospital beds can influence skin hydration and skin redness/erythema. METHODS: We included 25 healthy subjects in our study. Measurements were made using Courage & Khazaka Multi Probe Adapter MPA with Corneometer CM825 and Mexameter MX18 to determine skin hydration of the stratum corneum and skin redness/erythema before and after the subjects were lying in conventional (Viskolastic® Plus, Wulff Med Tec GmbH, Fedderingen, Germany and Duo™ 2 mattress, Hill-Rom GmbH Essen, Germany) or microclimate management capable mattresses/hospital beds (ClinActiv + MCM™ and PEARLS AFT, Hill-Rom GmbH Essen, Germany). RESULTS: While there was no difference in skin redness/erythema on the different mattresses/hospital beds, skin hydration of the stratum corneum decreased significantly in an air fluidized bed compared to baseline values and values measured on standard mattress/Viskolastic® Plus. CONCLUSION: Air-fluidized therapy reduces skin hydration and therefore could contribute to prevent moisture associated ulcers. Changes in skin hydration as one important factor of skin microclimate can be detected after a short time of incubation and even before an erythema appears.

A quantitative study of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) on conventional and microclimate management capable mattresses and hospital beds.

BACKGROUND: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is regarded as one of the most important parameters characterizing skin barrier integrity and has found to be higher in impaired skin barrier function. Reduced or low TEWL instead indicates skin barrier integrity or improvement. We evaluated if different mattresses/hospital beds can influence this skin barrier function by measuring TEWL before and after subjects lying in conventional and microclimate management capable mattresses/hospital beds. METHODS: We included 25 healthy subjects in our study. Measurements were made using Courage & Khazaka Multi Probe Adapter MPA with Tewameter TM300 to determine TEWL before and after the subjects were lying in conventional (Viskolastic® Plus, Wulff Med Tec GmbH, Fedderingen, Germany and Duo™ 2 mattress, Hill-Rom GmbH Essen, Germany) or microclimate management capable mattresses/hospital beds (ClinActiv + MCM™ and PEARLS AFT, Hill-Rom GmbH Essen, Germany). RESULTS: While there was no statistically significant difference in standard mattresses/hospital beds (22.19 ±â€¯12.99 and 19.80 ±â€¯11.48 g/hm2), the decrease of TEWL was statistically significant in both microclimate management capable mattresses/hospital beds we investigated (16.89 ±â€¯8.586 g/hm2 and 17.41 ±â€¯7.203 g/hm2) compared to baseline values (35.85 ±â€¯24.51 g/hm2). CONCLUSION: As higher TEWL announces impaired skin barrier function these findings indicate that the choice of the mattress/hospital bed is important for skin barrier function and microclimate management systems improve skin barrier function of the skin.