Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of etoricoxib tablet in healthy Bangladeshi volunteers.

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of two etoricoxib (CAS 202409-33-4) 60 mg formulations, namely Etocox-60 (test product) and reference product, and to evaluate whether these two formulations meet the FDA criteria to assume bioequivalence. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were enrolled into this randomized, single-dose, 2-way crossover, open-label pharmacokinetic study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test formulation followed by the reference formulation or vice versa as a single dose of 60 mg tablets after 12 h overnight fasting, with a washout period of two weeks. Following oral administration, blood samples were collected at 0 (baseline), 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 24.0, 48.0, 72.0, 96.0, and 120.0 h. Serum concentration of etoricoxib was assessed using a high performance liquid chromatographic-UV spectrometry procedure. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by the non-compartmental method. After administering a single dose of 60 mg of each etoricoxib formulation, the obtained mean (SD) values for the test and reference products were 1.26 (0.33) and 1.29 (0.35) microg/ml for Cmax; 3.25 (2.64) and 2.63 (1.40) h for t(max); 29.63 (8.31) and 30.40 (5.85) h x microg/ml for AUC0-120; and 31.84 (10.97) and 33.00 (8.10) h x microg/ml for AUC0-infinity, respectively. The mean t1/2 was found 27.99 (7.87) h and 29.84 (7.93) h for test and reference product respectively. From paired t-test, no significant differences were observed (p > 0.05) for any pharmacokinetic parameters. After analysis of variance, no period, sequence or formulation effects were observed for any pharmacokinetic property. The 90% confidence intervals of the test/reference mean ratios of the 1n-transformed AUC0-120, AUC0-infinity and Cmax mean values were 95.90% (85.37%-107.74 %), 94.69% (84.43%-106.20%) and 97.87% (85.54 %-111.98 %), respectively, which fell within the predetermined FDA bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. This single-dose study found that the test and reference formulations of etoricoxib met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in terms of both rate and extent of absorption.

Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic study of two different omeprazole capsule formulations in healthy Bangladeshi volunteers.

Omeprazole (CAS 73590-58-6) effectively suppresses the gastric acid secretion in the parietal cells of the stomach and is a widely prescribed proton pump inhibitor in Bangladesh. The increasing number of omeprazole containing products available in the market raises questions of therapeutic equivalence and/or generic substitution which are yet to be conducted with Bangladeshi population. The aim of the study is to assess the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic properties of two oral formulations of 20 mg omeprazole capsule, the reference product and Omep-20 as test product using serum data. The randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted on 24 healthy male subjects in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH guidelines. Subjects were assigned to receive test and reference as a single dose of 20 mg capsule under fasting condition, following a washout period of one week. After oral administration, blood samples were collected at various time intervals and analyzed for omeprazole concentrations using a validated HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental method. From serum data, the obtained values for test and reference products were 648.07 +/- 216.27 and 632.69 +/- 257.01 ng/ml for Cmax; 2012.24 +/- 634.48 and 1907.86 +/- 761.91 ng x h/ml for AUC0-24; 2105.21 +/- 623.79 and 1979.18 +/- 748.12 ng x h/ml for AUC0-infinity respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between two formulations by analyzing different pharmacokinetic parameters in terms of period, sequence or formulation. From the paired t-test, no significant differences between two formulation were observed (p > 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals of Cmax, AUC0-24 and AUC0-infinity were found to be 91.59% to 122.60%, 101.86% to 116.78% and 102.77% to 116.68% respectively which are within the FDA accepted limits for bioequivalence (80%-125 %). Finally it can be concluded that both products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption and therefore interchangeable.