Use of rituximab as an induction therapy in anti-glomerular basement-membrane disease.

BACKGROUND: Anti-glomerular basement-membrane (anti-GBM) disease (or Goodpasture disease) is characterized by severe kidney and lung involvement. Prognoses have improved with treatments that combine plasma exchange and immunosuppressive drugs. However, patients with severe renal involvement can have poor renal outcomes and cyclophosphamide can cause significant complications. Anti-GBM antibodies have a direct pathogenic effect on the disease: thus, therapeutics that can decrease their production, such as rituximab, could be a good alternative. METHODS: The medical files of five patients that had received rituximab as a first-line therapy (instead of cyclophosphamide), plus plasma exchange and steroids, were reviewed. All patients had severe disease manifestations. RESULTS: Four patients required dialysis at diagnosis and remained dialysis-dependent over the mean follow-up of 15 months. Three patients had pulmonary involvement, but recovered even though mechanical ventilation was required. Anti-GBM antibodies became rapidly undetectable in all patients. One infectious and two hematological complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We report the outcomes of five patients with Goodpasture disease and treated with rituximab as a first-line treatment. This strategy was effective at treating pulmonary manifestations and was associated with a good biological response with no major serious adverse events. However, renal outcomes were not significantly improved.

Effect of double-filtration plasmapheresis for antibody-mediated rejection on hemostasis parameters and thrombin generation.

INTRODUCTION: Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) cause kidney-allograft loss in chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR). Treatment relies on blocking antibody-producing cells and removing DSAs by apheresis: e.g., double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine the impact of DFPP (6 or 8 sessions/patient) on clotting factors and natural anticoagulants, and on thrombin generation, we performed a prospective and observational study in five CAMR kidney-transplant patients who received DFPP plus rituximab therapy. Thrombin generation was performed in poor platelet plasma (PPP) with 5 pM tissue factor without and with 2 nM recombinant human thrombomodulin. RESULTS: After the first DFPP session, median levels of high molecular-weight proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, FXI, FXIII, von Willebrand factors and α2-MG) decreased significantly to <50% of baseline values, whereas levels of low molecular-weight factors (<100 kDa) were not significantly modified, except for protein S and TFPI. Of note, binding-protein (BP) S, i.e., C4BP, was significantly decreased. Over the course of successive DFPP sessions, both high and lower molecular-weight proteins (<100 kDa) with longer half-lives (>2 days, prothrombin and factor XII) were significantly decreased. DFPP also highly affected thrombin generation in the absence of thrombomodulin but not significantly in the presence of thrombomodulin. After the first DFPP session, mean endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin (PH) significantly decreased when the thrombin generation assay was performed without thrombomodulin (respectively, 1084 nM·min for ETP and 210 nM for PH after the first DFPP session compared to 1616 nM·min and 264 nM at baseline). In the presence of thrombomodulin, there was only a slight decrease in ETP and PH (respectively 748 nM·min, and 172 nM after the first DFPP session compared to 822 nM·min and 179 nM at baseline). After the last session, median ETP and PH decreased respectively to 646 nM·min and 143 nM without thrombomodulin, and, to 490 nM·min and 117 nM with thrombomodulin. CONCLUSIONS: DFPP significantly removed high molecular-weight proteins from the haemostatic system and profoundly decreased levels of protein S and TFPI. Overall thrombin-generation balance was only moderately affected in the presence of thrombomodulin. Nevertheless, high depletion of fibrinogen, FXIII and Von Willebrand Factor may expose patients to an increased risk of bleeding.

Lactobacillus bacteremia: Pathogen or prognostic marker?

OBJECTIVE: Lactobacillus bacteremia is a rare event and its epidemiology is poorly known. Whether Lactobacillus bacteremia is a contaminant, a risk factor, or a risk marker of death remains an open question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients presenting with Lactobacillus bacteremia (LB), between January 2005 and December 2014, at the Grenoble University Hospital. RESULTS: LB was observed in 38 patients (0.34% of all positive blood cultures). Cancer (40%), immunosuppression (37%), and use of central venous devices (29%) were frequently associated with LB. We observed a significant increase with time in the number of Lactobacillus positive blood cultures among all blood cultures performed (P=0.04). LBs were divided into two clinical-biological presentations: secondary bacteremia with a known portal of entry (n=30) and isolated bacteremia (n=8). Case fatality was 31% at D28, 55.2% at 1 year in the secondary bacteremia group, and 12.5% (both at D28 and 1 year) in the isolated bacteremia group. Secondary bacteremia with a known portal of entry was significantly associated with case fatality after adjustment for age, co-infection, cancer, immunosuppression, diabetes, and sex (OR 14.9 [1.04-216] P=0.047) for fatality at one year, but not for D28 fatality (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: Lactobacillus bacteremia may be an important marker of disease severity rather than a pathogen, suggesting comorbidities. It should not be considered a contaminant, but should lead physicians to screen for associated infections and underlying diseases.