Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en la cirugía de columna en un centro de segundo nivel / Impact of COVID-19 pandemia on spine surgery in 2nd level hospital

Introducción: Las consecuencias de la pandemia por COVID-19, como en otros aspectos de la medicina, se han visto reflejadas también en la actividad quirúrgica de columna vertebral. Objetivos: El objetivo principal del presente estudio es cuantificar el número de intervenciones realizadas entre los años 2016 y 2021 y analizar el tiempo de espera en los pacientes intervenidos como medida indirecta del volumen de la lista de espera. Como objetivos secundarios se realiza un análisis del tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y el tiempo quirúrgico a lo largo de la serie. Métodos: Se ha realizado un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en relación con el volumen de intervenciones y diagnósticos durante un periodo que incluye desde la etapa previa a la pandemia (2016) hasta finales del año 2021, en que la situación global llegó a una cuasi-normalización de la actividad. Se han identificado un total de 1.039 registros. Se incluyen las variables edad, género, días en lista de espera antes de la intervención, diagnóstico, tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y tiempo quirúrgico. Resultados: Se objetiva una disminución en el número total de intervenciones durante la pandemia respecto al año 2019 (32,15% menos el año 2020 y 23,5% menos el 2021). Tras el análisis de los datos, se observa un aumento en la dispersión y la mediana del tiempo de espera global y por patologías a partir de 2020, sin detectarse diferencias significativas en el tiempo de hospitalización ni en el tiempo quirúrgico. Conclusión: Durante la pandemia se ha producido una disminución del número de intervenciones debido a la necesidad de redistribuir recursos humanos y materiales para hacer frente al incremento de pacientes críticos afectados por la COVID-19. El aumento de la dispersión y de la mediana global y por patologías de la variable tiempo de espera se traduce como un aumento del tiempo de espera en las cirugías diferibles realizadas durante los años de...(AU)

Introduction: The consequences of COVID-19 pandemic, like in any other field of medicine, had such a massive effect in the activity of spine surgeons. Objectives: The main purpose of the study is quantifying the number of interventions done between 2016 and 2021 and analyze the time between the indication and the intervention as an indirect measurement of the waiting list. As secondary objectives we focused on variations of the length of stay and duration of the surgeries during this specific period. Methods: We performed a descriptive retrospective study including all the interventions and diagnosis made during a period including pre-pandemic data (starting on 2016) until 2021, when we considered the normalization of surgical activity was achieved. A total of 1039 registers were compiled. The data collected included age, gender, days in waiting list before the intervention, diagnosis, time of hospitalization and surgery duration. Results: We found that the total number of interventions during the pandemic has significantly decreased compared to 2019 (32.15% less in 2020 and 23.5% less in 2021). After data analysis, we found an increase of data dispersion, average waiting list time and for diagnosis after 2020. No differences were found regarding hospitalization time or surgical time. Conclusion: The number of surgeries decreased during pandemic due to the redistribution of human and material resources to face the raising of critical COVID-19 patients. The increase of data dispersion and median of waiting time, is the consequence of a growing waiting list for non-urgent surgeries during the pandemic as the urgent interventions also raised, those with a shorter waiting time.(AU)

[Translated article] Impact of COVID-19 pandemia on spine surgery in 2nd level hospital / Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en la cirugía de columna en un centro de segundo nivel

Introducción: Las consecuencias de la pandemia por COVID-19, como en otros aspectos de la medicina, se han visto reflejadas también en la actividad quirúrgica de columna vertebral. Objetivos: El objetivo principal del presente estudio es cuantificar el número de intervenciones realizadas entre los años 2016 y 2021 y analizar el tiempo de espera en los pacientes intervenidos como medida indirecta del volumen de la lista de espera. Como objetivos secundarios se realiza un análisis del tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y el tiempo quirúrgico a lo largo de la serie. Métodos: Se ha realizado un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en relación con el volumen de intervenciones y diagnósticos durante un periodo que incluye desde la etapa previa a la pandemia (2016) hasta finales del año 2021, en que la situación global llegó a una cuasi-normalización de la actividad. Se han identificado un total de 1.039 registros. Se incluyen las variables edad, género, días en lista de espera antes de la intervención, diagnóstico, tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y tiempo quirúrgico. Resultados: Se objetiva una disminución en el número total de intervenciones durante la pandemia respecto al año 2019 (32,15% menos el año 2020 y 23,5% menos el 2021). Tras el análisis de los datos, se observa un aumento en la dispersión y la mediana del tiempo de espera global y por patologías a partir de 2020, sin detectarse diferencias significativas en el tiempo de hospitalización ni en el tiempo quirúrgico. Conclusión: Durante la pandemia se ha producido una disminución del número de intervenciones debido a la necesidad de redistribuir recursos humanos y materiales para hacer frente al incremento de pacientes críticos afectados por la COVID-19. El aumento de la dispersión y de la mediana global y por patologías de la variable tiempo de espera se traduce como un aumento del tiempo de espera en las cirugías diferibles realizadas durante los años de...(AU)

Introduction: The consequences of COVID-19 pandemic, like in any other field of medicine, had such a massive effect in the activity of spine surgeons. Objectives: The main purpose of the study is quantifying the number of interventions done between 2016 and 2021 and analyze the time between the indication and the intervention as an indirect measurement of the waiting list. As secondary objectives we focused on variations of the length of stay and duration of the surgeries during this specific period. Methods: We performed a descriptive retrospective study including all the interventions and diagnosis made during a period including pre-pandemic data (starting on 2016) until 2021, when we considered the normalization of surgical activity was achieved. A total of 1039 registers were compiled. The data collected included age, gender, days in waiting list before the intervention, diagnosis, time of hospitalization and surgery duration. Results: We found that the total number of interventions during the pandemic has significantly decreased compared to 2019 (32.15% less in 2020 and 23.5% less in 2021). After data analysis, we found an increase of data dispersion, average waiting list time and for diagnosis after 2020. No differences were found regarding hospitalization time or surgical time. Conclusion: The number of surgeries decreased during pandemic due to the redistribution of human and material resources to face the raising of critical COVID-19 patients. The increase of data dispersion and median of waiting time, is the consequence of a growing waiting list for non-urgent surgeries during the pandemic as the urgent interventions also raised, those with a shorter waiting time.(AU)

[Translated article] Impact of COVID-19 pandemia on spine surgery in 2nd level hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The consequences of COVID-19 pandemic, like in any other field of medicine, had such a massive effect in the activity of spine surgeons. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of the study is quantifying the number of interventions done between 2016 and 2021 and analyze the time between the indication and the intervention as an indirect measurement of the waiting list. As secondary objectives we focused on variations of the length of stay and duration of the surgeries during this specific period. METHODS: We performed a descriptive retrospective study including all the interventions and diagnosis made during a period including pre-pandemic data (starting on 2016) until 2021, when we considered the normalization of surgical activity was achieved. A total of 1039 registers were compiled. The data collected included age, gender, days in waiting list before the intervention, diagnosis, time of hospitalization and surgery duration. RESULTS: We found that the total number of interventions during the pandemic has significantly decreased compared to 2019 (32.15% less in 2020 and 23.5% less in 2021). After data analysis, we found an increase of data dispersion, average waiting list time and for diagnosis after 2020. No differences were found regarding hospitalization time or surgical time. CONCLUSION: The number of surgeries decreased during pandemic due to the redistribution of human and material resources to face the raising of critical COVID-19 patients. The increase of data dispersion and median of waiting time, is the consequence of a growing waiting list for non-urgent surgeries during the pandemic as the urgent interventions also raised, those with a shorter waiting time.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemia on spine surgery in 2nd level hospital. / Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en la cirugía de columna en un centro de segundo nivel.

INTRODUCTION: The consequences of COVID-19 pandemic, like in any other field of medicine, had such a massive effect in the activity of spine surgeons. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of the study is quantifying the number of interventions done between 2016 and 2021 and analyze the time between the indication and the intervention as an indirect measurement of the waiting list. As secondary objectives we focused on variations of the length of stay and duration of the surgeries during this specific period. METHODS: We performed a descriptive retrospective study including all the interventions and diagnosis made during a period including pre-pandemic data (starting on 2016) until 2021, when we considered the normalization of surgical activity was achieved. A total of 1039 registers were compiled. The data collected included age, gender, days in waiting list before the intervention, diagnosis, time of hospitalization and surgery duration. RESULTS: We found that the total number of interventions during the pandemic has significantly decreased compared to 2019 (32.15% less in 2020 and 23.5% less in 2021). After data analysis, we found an increase of data dispersion, average waiting list time and for diagnosis after 2020. No differences were found regarding hospitalization time or surgical time. CONCLUSION: The number of surgeries decreased during pandemic due to the redistribution of human and material resources to face the raising of critical COVID-19 patients. The increase of data dispersion and median of waiting time, is the consequence of a growing waiting list for non-urgent surgeries during the pandemic as the urgent interventions also raised, those with a shorter waiting time.

Migración posterior epidural de fragmento discal / Epidural posterior migration of disc fragment

Introducción. La migración posterior epidural de un fragmento de hernia discal lumbar es una presentación clínica infrecuente. Caso clínico. Presentamos el caso de un paciente varón de 76 años, que acude por dolor lumbar y paraparesia progresiva en extremidades inferiores, con la aparición a los 4 días del ingreso de un síndrome de cauda equina. La resonancia magnética muestra espondilosis lumbar y una masa intrarraquídea bien delimitada en el espacio epidural posterior. Se realiza una exéresis quirúrgica de la masa epidural. El estudio anatomopatológico informó de fragmento de disco intervertebral, por lo que se trataba de una migración completa de una hernia discal lumbar. Tras la intervención quirúrgica y un tratamiento rehabilitador específico remitió la clínica del paciente. Conclusiones. Los pacientes con migración posterior de un fragmento de disco presentan graves déficits neurológicos como el síndrome de cauda equina. Debido a que las imágenes radiológicas de los fragmentos del disco son similares a los de otras lesiones como metástasis, quiste sinovial, absceso dural o hematoma, el diagnóstico definitivo se realiza mediante exéresis y estudio anatomopatológico. El tratamiento quirúrgico urgente es necesario para evitar déficits neurológicos severos (AU)

Introduction. The posterior epidural migration of a fragment of lumbar disc herniation is a rare clinical presentation. Case report. We report the case of a 76-year-old with back pain and progressive paraparesis in the lower limbs, with the emergence of a cauda equina syndrome 4 days after admission. MRI showed lumbar spondylosis and a well-defined intra-spinal mass in the posterior epidural space. Surgical resection of the epidural mass was performed. The pathological study revealed an intervertebral disc fragment; thus it was a complete migration of a herniated lumbar disc. The patient was healed after surgery and specific rehabilitation treatment. Conclusions. Patients with posterior migration of disc fragment may present with severe neurological deficits, such as cauda equina syndrome. Because the radiological images of disc fragments are similar to those of other lesions, such as metastasis, synovial cyst, dural abscess or haematoma, definitive diagnosis is made by excision and pathological study. Emergency surgery is required to prevent severe neurological deficits (AU)

[Epidural posterior migration of disc fragment]. / Migración posterior epidural de fragmento discal.

INTRODUCTION: The posterior epidural migration of a fragment of lumbar disc herniation is a rare clinical presentation. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 76-year-old with back pain and progressive paraparesis in the lower limbs, with the emergence of a cauda equina syndrome 4 days after admission. MRI showed lumbar spondylosis and a well-defined intra-spinal mass in the posterior epidural space. Surgical resection of the epidural mass was performed. The pathological study revealed an intervertebral disc fragment; thus it was a complete migration of a herniated lumbar disc. The patient was healed after surgery and specific rehabilitation treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with posterior migration of disc fragment may present with severe neurological deficits, such as cauda equina syndrome. Because the radiological images of disc fragments are similar to those of other lesions, such as metastasis, synovial cyst, dural abscess or haematoma, definitive diagnosis is made by excision and pathological study. Emergency surgery is required to prevent severe neurological deficits.

[Madelung's deformity. A new therapeutic approach]. / Déformation de Madelung. Nouvelle approach thérapeutique.

Symptomatic Madelung's disease does not respond to conservative treatment and the objectives of surgical treatment are essentially to obtain a congruent and correctly oriented radio-carpal joint line in order to preserve maximal and painless range of joint movement. The various surgical treatment modalities proposed to date have been essentially cosmetic and are not sufficient to achieve these objectives. The authors propose a new therapeutic approach to this deformity: radiolunate and inferior radio-ulnar arthrodesis with Kapandji's technique associated with radio-carpal reorientation osteotomy, as required. The results obtained in the first four cases are evaluated with a clinical follow-up of eighteen months to five years.