RESUMO
Background: The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy of the Faculty Development Program (FDP) implemented at the Saint George University of Beirut-Faculty of Medicine (SGUB FM) under exceptional circumstances as the triple blow to Beirut. Methods: The Faculty Development, directed towards a cohort of 35 faculty members, is composed of two major components: methodology of teaching and techniques of assessment. The Kirkpatrick's assessment model, in combination with a specifically designed psychological questionnaire, were chosen to assess the effectiveness of the faculty development initiative. Results: Results of the different questionnaires were interpreted individually, then through the lens of the psychological questionnaire. A majority of faculty (55%) were significantly affected psychologically by Beirut's triple blow and 77% of all participants found the workshops to be of excellent quality (Kirkpatrick's Level I). Moreover, Kirkpatrick's level II results yielded a 76% mean percentage of correct answers to post-workshops MCQs and a significant improvement in the mean results of the self-assessment questionnaires, administered before and after each workshop. Results also show that the more a trainee is psychologically affected, the less he/she performs as evidenced by a decrease in the satisfaction rate as well as in the score of the cognitive MCQs and of the self-assessment questionnaires. Conclusions: This study was able to highlight that significant learning can occur amidst exceptional circumstances like the Beirut triple blow and administration should invest in professional growth to retain its faculty.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this national survey was to identify the levels of colorectal cancer screening knowledge and uptake in Lebanon. METHODS: A total of 1200 participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional household survey targeting the Lebanese population aged 50 years and above. The sample was recruited using a two-stage stratified cluster sampling approach. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 38.3% knew about any screening test for colorectal cancer but only 7.5% had ever used any. Thirty-nine percent of the participants rated their risk of getting colorectal cancer as very low or low, and only 53.5% were confident in their ability to undertake a screening test. Almost all participants agreed that medical advice and test reimbursement would encourage them to do a screening test. At the multivariate analysis level, hearing of an awareness campaign in the last two years showed the strongest association with the knowledge of a colorectal cancer screening test with an estimated ORadj = 5.12 (95%CI: 3.67 - 7.15). Other factors that were significantly associated with this knowledge variable included: a family history of colorectal cancer, a personal history of colorectal illness, having a health coverage, and knowledge of colorectal cancer signs and symptoms. DISCUSSION: This national study highlights an alarming lack of uptake and low levels of knowledge of colorectal cancer screening tests even though it is among the most prevalent cancers in Lebanon and its prevalence has been continuously increasing in the past years. The evidence suggests that people who had an experience with colorectal cancer diagnostic tests, either personally or through a family member, and those who have heard of an awareness campaign about colorectal cancer in the last two years are more likely to know its screening tests. CONCLUSION: Colorectal cancer screening knowledge and uptake in Lebanon are limited and justify the need for public health interventions. This study gives evidence that awareness campaigns, coupled with the involvement of medical providers and the reimbursement of screening test fees, would alleviate the burden of colorectal cancer in Lebanon.
