Feasibility and efficacy of the Vojta therapy in subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Subacromial impingement syndrome (IS) is a common disorder associated with functional impairment and disability of the shoulder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Vojta therapy (VT) techniques compared with standard therapy (ST) in patients with subacromial IS. A randomized controlled trial was performed, with 60 patients with IS (mean age, 61±12 years) randomized into two groups: ST (n=30) and ST plus Vojta therapy (SVT, n=30). Both received 15 treatment sessions over 4 weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity, functionality, joint range of motion (RoM), strength, and quality of life measurements. The efficacy of both treatments was analysed, both comparatively and separately, immediately after completion of treatment and after 3 months. After the intervention, both groups showed statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale (P=0.001), RoM (P<0.01), and strength (P<0.001), which were also seen 3 months after the intervention. SVT is more efficient in both the short and medium term in reducing pain, improving functionality, increasing articular RoM and strength, and offering a better quality of life in IS patients.

Vojta Therapy versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for lumbosciatica syndrome: A quasi-experimental pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Lumbosciatica is a common condition that affects patients' quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of Vojta Therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of lumbosciatica. METHODS: A "pre-post" quasi-experimental pilot study was carried out on 12 patients between 31 and 74 years of age who had been diagnosed with lumbosciatica and referred to the Physiotherapy Unit of the Quintanar de la Orden Health Center. Subjects were prescribed either TENS or Vojta, assigned alternately (6:6). All patients received one session of 30 min per day for 15 days. Tests to evaluate pain, disability, functionality, and radiculopathy were performed. RESULTS: The differences between pre-post measures and improvement after both treatments were analyzed with nonparametric tests. Significant improvements were noted after both treatments in indices for pain, disability, and flexibility, with the exception of disability after TENS, according to the Roland-Morris test (p = 0.066). Improvements in radiculopathy (Làsegue sign) were only observed with Vojta (p = 0.031). An overall decrease in scores obtained after Vojta was observed with respect to those obtained after TENS (difference V-T): pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (V-T = 2.84; p = 0.033) or Oswestry back pain (V-T = 2.67; p = 0.030) and leg pain tests (V-T = 3.25; p = 0.063); disability according to Oswestry (V-T = 28.33; p = 0.005) and Roland-Morris (V-T = 5.67; p = 0.044); flexibility according to Schöber (average gain V-T = 0.43; p = 0.292) and the fingertips to floor distance test (V-T = 7.5; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Vojta Therapy led to significantly greater improvements in pain, disability, flexibility, and radiculopathy than TENS. Future studies will require larger samples to confirm these findings.