Trend analysis of quality indicators in palliative home care among terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients in Taiwan: a 6-year observational study.

PURPOSE: Palliative home care services (PHCS) have been emerging for years. However, limited data exist regarding quality indicators for pain control, unplanned hospital readmissions, and household deaths among terminal cancer and non-cancer patients receiving PHCS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective collection and recording of data from 1242 terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients receiving PHCS. The data were obtained from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH) for the period from 2016 to 2021. T test and chi-square test were applied for characteristics and the quality indicators among cancer and non-cancer groups. Chi-square test was used for trend analysis of the number of patients receiving PHCS and the quality indicators among cancer and non-cancer groups throughout the study period. RESULTS: A total of 1242 terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients who had received PHCS were documented by TCVGH from the years 2016 to 2021, including 221 non-cancer patients and 1021 cancer patients having an average age of 70. The number of terminally ill cancer and non-cancer patients receiving PHCS has increased annually since 2016. Another finding was that age was a statistically significant factor impacting quality indicators. On the other hand, compared to non-cancer patients, cancer patients had a higher likelihood of receiving treatment with analgesics when needed. Their odds of needing analgesics more than three times within 4 days after PHCS enrollment were significantly elevated [OR 4.188, 95% CI (1.002, 17.51)]. CONCLUSION: The results of this 6-year observational study indicate a substantial increase in the number of terminal cancer and non-cancer patients receiving PHCS over the past decade. Furthermore, aging plays an important role in life quality of terminal cancer and non-cancer patients.

Death place and palliative outcome indicators in patients under palliative home care service: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Dying at home accompanied by loved-ones is regarded favorably and brings good luck in Taiwan. This study aimed to examine the relevant factors affecting whether an individual dies at home or not in a group of terminal patients receiving palliative home care service. METHODS: The patients who were admitted to a palliative home care service at a hospital-affiliated home health care agency were consecutively enrolled between March 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022. During the period of care, the instruments of the palliative care outcomes collaboration was used to assess patients in each home visit twice a week, including symptom assessment scale, palliative care problem severity score, Australia-modified Karnofsky performance status, resource utilization groups-activities of daily living, and palliative care phase. RESULTS: There were 56 participants (53.6% female) with a median age of 73.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 61.3-80.3 y/o), of whom 51 (91.1%) patients were diagnosed with cancer and 49 (96.1%) had metastasis. The number of home visits was 3.5 (IQR 2.0-5.0) and the average number of days under palliative home care service was 31 (IQR 16.3-51.5) before their death. After the end of the study, there was a significant deterioration of sleeping, appetite, and breathing problems in the home-death group, and appetite problems in the non-home death patients. However, physician-reported psychological/spiritual problems improved in the home-death group, and pain improved in the non-home death patients. Physical performance deteriorated in both groups, and more resource utilization of palliative care was needed. The 44 patients who died at home had greater cancer disease severity, fewer admissions, and the proportion of families desiring a home death for the patient was higher. CONCLUSIONS: Although the differences in palliative outcome indicators were minor between patients who died at home and those who died in the hospital, understanding the determinants and change of indicators after palliative care service at different death places may be helpful for improving the quality of end-of-life care.